Phil Goff gets ready to bow out today

Print

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 6:30a.m.

Phil Goff (Reuters)

Phil Goff (Reuters)

By Emma Brannam

Phil Goff has promised to let Labour MPs know today whether he wants to continue as party leader.

It's widely expected that he will stand down from the position, but may wait few weeks before handing over the reins while his party choose a successor.

Front runners for his job are seniors MPs David Cunliffe and David Parker.

Politics is often about timing. In 2008, the slightly strained look on Phil Goff's face said it all.

The party had lost that year’s election, the world was in recession and a charismatic, boyish new Prime Minister had the country enthralled. But Mr Goff remained optimistic.

“I've got to tell you I'm not old enough to be John Key's father. Maybe his older brother, slightly wiser and slightly more experienced,” he said.

Mr Goff has been in politics for 27 years. He left home at 16, paid his way through university with a job in a freezing works then became MP of Mount Roskill in 1981. Three years later he was the youngest cabinet minister in a new Labour Government.

“I first met Phil when he was at high school and we joined him up into the Labour party, he's his own guy, he's focused, he's disciplined and he's real smart,” says former Prime Minister Michael Moore.

Under Helen Clark, Mr Goff was widely regarded as a highly competent minister with portfolios including foreign affairs and defence and disarmament. But during his time as leader it's been his own troops that have been hard to rally.

The Darren Hughes affair was a telling example of how Mr Goff was often on his own.

“He was like a 16th century Scottish king. If he could count on the loyalty of one in 10 of his lords he was doing well,” says political commentator Chris Trotter.

In the end some of the greatest support has come from the enemy.

“He's a hardworking parliamentarian and he's always had New Zealand's best interests at heart,” says Prime Minister John Key.

For Mr Goff that'll have to be enough.

“In the end it wasn't our time. We gave it our best shot, we fought that campaign hard and we fought on issues that we believed in,” he says.

Mr Goff is expected to fall on his sword today with an announcement about the Labour leadership after a morning meeting with caucus.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

29 Nov 2011 01:25p.m.

Martin wrote:

It's not just Goff and I see no other leaders in the Labour party more able to lead. The whole Labour party has collectively lost traction and become weak in policy making without sound decision making. What are they doing and how are they going to do it and fund it and the projected outcome? And looks has nothing to do with abilities or decision making?. Potato head. Pointy nose. Big ears. Sheman. Noodle. Fulla. Mouldy. Spectacle. Guess who these are?

29 Nov 2011 12:42p.m.

peter wrote:

People are so stupid thinking john key is the man to run the country. yes sell the assets and live like a king. yes the rich will get richer. I feel sorry for the poor.Phil Goff is a leader but people didn't give him a chance. so when the crap hits the fan. the people who voted national will have their selves the blame. this country will have nothing the water ways will be sold with the power.BIG MISSTAKE

29 Nov 2011 12:10p.m.

Sanchez H Marshall wrote:

Labour need an old-fashioned lefty as its leader if it is to reconnect with its disenfranchised voter base. The problem is, however, there are no true lefties in that party anymore.

29 Nov 2011 11:52a.m.

Maisie wrote:

I can remember Mr Goff recently saying, publicly, that if there was anyone better than him to lead the Labour party he would step down???? What happened to change his mind???

29 Nov 2011 11:04a.m.

Janetta wrote:

I'm not a labour supporter, but I don't think Phil Goff's party have given him much of a chance and I do not think much of the prospects from any of the three Davids. I suppose they have already made up their mind, but think they should stay with Phill Goff I think he is better than the other three put together would be's. It's a sad day if the compliments he gets are outside his party and not from his own(though that was kind of the outsiders). I think those wanting rid of Phill Goff must only be interested in pushing their own profile and a bit selfless. Loyalty seems to be amiss in the labour party. I have my doubts re next election whether they will fare any better with that sort of attitude. Phill Goff is a hard worker, caring and true to his values and hope things go well for him.

29 Nov 2011 10:48a.m.

Sam wrote:

Vote for Co leadership with Andrew little in the mix!!!

29 Nov 2011 10:46a.m.

Jo wrote:

There's no rush. Phil is wise and a safe pair of hands. Why not take it slowly and see who emerges over the next months as good leadership material. Time for a competent woman if one emerges?

29 Nov 2011 09:50a.m.

Ricardo wrote:

Labour needs to come up with a statesman, a strong respected and respectful leader. Don't see any in the current bunch.

29 Nov 2011 09:48a.m.

alice wrote:

I'm not a labour voter, but have to accept Phil Geoff is a fighter. He works hard but it's not his time. He's not as likeable as John Key. Compared to the 3 David's, I would rather see phil there not leaving the party. the other three are not as good as phil.

29 Nov 2011 08:51a.m.

pat wrote:

There should be a younger fresh face for the 'new' labour party perhaps jacinda adhern or another woman,i think shearer would be a good fresh face,even phil twyford and jacinda would be a good pairing,parker and cunlife are yesterdays news.