• Full Story

Pig farmer cleared by MAF over cruelty charges

Print

Wed, 20 May 2009 12:00a.m.

Colin Kay's Levin piggery has been cleared by MAF

Colin Kay's Levin piggery has been cleared by MAF

Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry investigators say a piggery belonging to a former pork industry board chairman is not breaking any animal welfare laws.

MAF investigations manager Greg Reid told Newstalk ZB the ministry could only take action if specific animals were suffering unnecessarily or if the pigs had untreated diseases.

He expected the case to trigger a review of regulations for operating pig farms.

The farm had also been investigated three years ago, and cleared of any wrong-doing.

Later today, National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee members would discuss
the future of sow crates, used in pig farms .

Animal welfare activists have criticised the use of farrowing stalls for pregnant pigs, with an animal rights group raiding a farm belonging to former New Zealand Pork Industry Board chairman Colin Kay.

TVNZ's Sunday programme aired footage by animal welfare organisation Open Rescue, who were accompanied by comedian Mike King during a break-in at Mr Kay's Levin pig farm.

Mr Kay said activists had stirred the pigs up, and he was considering legal action against the raiders.

"I don't know what those people were doing in there [to provoke the pigs], they don't normally behave that way," he told Radio New Zealand.

Mr King, who has appeared in numerous pork industry board advertising campaigns, said he felt deeply ashamed of his role in promoting that type of farming.

The pigs were unable to move and obviously in distress, chewing at the cage bars and frothing, he said.

The comedian and former pork industry poster-boy became involved in the plight of farmed pigs after animal welfare advocates sent him material detailing conditions in the farms.

Meanwhile, a major bacon supplier, Hellers Tasty Ltd, has said the example shown in the media in recent days was not representative of the industry.

"But we are checking conditions and pig raising practices on all farms from which we source product," managing director Nick Harris said.

The Green Party said the programme had "lifted the petticoats" on the pork industry.

Green MP and animal welfare spokesperson Sue Kedgley said she planned to take a cross party group of MPs to visit some intensive pig farms.

She said Agriculture Minister David Carter "has a duty, as minister of agriculture, to learn about the reality of pig farming in New Zealand".

At his post cabinet press conference yesterday, Prime Minister John Key said he found the television footage of intensive pig farming "very, very disturbing".

The New Zealand Pork Industry said the pork industry was phasing out long-term use of sow stalls and that the programme did not represent the pork industry as a whole.

The pork industry's board had postponed the annual Bacon of the Year awards in response to the programme.

NZPA

 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

31 May 2010 01:22p.m.

Eleanor wrote:

It's ture my father is the manager for the Greytown piggery and our video camera was cut off around when they took the footage and we also have three eco shelters for the pigglets that have just come off their mothers were they can run around

31 May 2010 01:04p.m.

Eleanor wrote:

I'm Eleanor and my dad is the manager of the Greytown piggery and our video camera was cut of around the time that it had been broken into.

03 Nov 2009 05:25p.m.

Emily wrote:

Did you break into the greytown piggery to get footage? and if you did why?

20 May 2009 02:55p.m.

Donna wrote:

Yah!! It’s all out in the open!!!!!!!
Let’s keep on to this until the law is changed and pigs are kept in a happy humane way. Everyone get your friends to email, don’t just stand back and think things will get sorted out by everyone else. Have a voice and make a difference.
This is unethical, inhumane, disgusting and needless cruelty happening in our own “clean & green” country!! Anyone who moans about free range pigs harming each other when outdoors is just ignorant. They should have watched Country Calendar a couple of weeks ago with the couple farming free range chickens and pigs – no problem for them at all! And, if even if that were the case, I think they would rather have the occasional bite than a life time of lying in their own mess, never able to turn around, having a dead pig lay next to me in the next tiny pen – showing me my fate… It’s all just so unnecessary!
Consumers, please vote in the supermarkets. Free range all the way. I’d rather pay more and/or have a bit less, enjoy it and be able to sleep at night. Keep up the great messages everyone. If we don’t go quiet and stay committed we can make changes.
And, to all you cage pig farmers who want all this to just go away… How can you honestly live with yourselves? Is money and profit (greed) that important to you? At the end of the day, you can’t fool “Mother Nature”. What goes-around-comes-around, and based on that, I would be very concerned if I were you…
To the intelligent pigs, we’re coming… ?
Donna

20 May 2009 02:05p.m.

Bridget wrote:

The Pork Industry Board and others involved in the sanctioning of intensive farming (such as MAF and NAWAC) seem to assume that cost is the only thing that matters to consumers. Why do they give the consumer no credit for wanting their food to come from animals who have had at least some enjoyment of life before slaughter? Spokespeople for the industry keep talking about how much more pork products would cost if pigs were allowed to spend some of their lives outside, expressing natural behaviours - it would be more honest for them to talk about how much smaller would be the profit margins of the intensive farmers.

Pork products are widely available and yet it is rare to ever see pigs in the countryside. Why? - because pigs are largely kept in intensive systems, behind closed door where the public can't see what's going on, except when film footage like that in sunday night's programme (filmed illegally!) are shown to them.

The farm depicted on the Sunday programme is not some rogue enterprise. What was shown in the programme is legal, widespread and sanctioned by the Code of Welfare for pigs, produced in accordance with the provisions of the Animal Welfare Act. It is the code system and its administration by MAF (the same agency that is charged with maximising productivity and profit in NZ's farming industry) that is fundamentally flawed and needs major change.

Let's hope that in the future we can look back on this programme, and the one made by Campbell Live a few years ago, and see that they were a turning point for farm animal welfare in New Zealand.

20 May 2009 01:14p.m.

Rachel wrote:

Oh gee, I sure am surprised to learn that MAF cleared him of any wrong doings (NOT!!!)... This just highlights the type of legislation we all live by. If this kind of practice is considered to be within that legislation, then we need a damn quick re-write of it because this practice is just appalling

20 May 2009 11:57a.m.

cherie wrote:

Yes he has been trying to open up another farm but he is arguing the councils requirements.
If he did not he would of been able to of done this by now.
He still does not need to keep the animals this way. Other farmers don't so why can't he.
Most free range pigs are not put in together by the way they have a run so don't fight with others

20 May 2009 11:35a.m.

Alien wrote:

so why is everyone focusing on the farmer? Why not focus on the fact that he has been tied up in red tape for 4 years trying to get consent to rebuild the place? Perhaps some of you could close down for four five years while the council pisses around on your consent application, but most people have to make a living. If anything is at fault it is the red tape that has stopped him from redeveloping this to give the pigs better space.

Marianne ever had pigs? we had five a few years ago, never again, they would fight with each other, they would attack people. And they were free range.

20 May 2009 10:47a.m.

Marianne wrote:

I am getting tired of hearing the pork industry spokesman saying that their industry is getting rid of sow stalls. This is rubbish. They have been fighting against making changes for years. Only now that the public are waking up to what has been happening to pigs, are they pretending to care.

Chris Trengrove also repeats the fallacy that sow stalls are the best thing for pigs, because otherwise they fight. Free range farmers don't have problems with fighting pigs, so there is no argument that sow stalls are necessary at any point. Only intensive farming systems stress these intelligent creatures to the point where they sometimes fight. To read the facts, rather than the pork industry lies being motivated by profit, have a look at http://www.lovepigs.org.nz/Latest-news/Mike-King-story/Truth-and-lies/

There needs to be urgent labeling of pig products so that consumers can avoid intensively reared meat and if you disagree with this cruelty, stop buying pig products to give a clear message to the producers.

20 May 2009 10:38a.m.

Paul wrote:

In his book, "The Pig Who Sang to the Moon" the author Jeffrey Masson says the following about cruelty to animals (p224):

"We cannot justify everyday cruelty to people who look just like us and seem to be put together in much the same way. But we do justify treating other living beings, farm animals, as if they were nothing but inanimate objects. They are not. It is a tragedy of our making to deprive a pig of his capacity to fully enjoy his life. We too, become tragic, pathetic figures when we live carelessly off the suffering of other creatures".