• Full Story

Police threaten to reduce speeding tolerance

Print

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 8:31a.m.

Police are considering permanently reducing the speeding tolerance

Police are considering permanently reducing the speeding tolerance

Police are threatening to permanently reduce the speed limit tolerance in an effort to reduce the road toll.

Since 2010 police have been cutting the 10kmph tolerance allowed in 100kmph speed limit areas to 4kmph over public holidays.

The 4kmph tolerance has now been introduced for the rest of February.

National manager road policing Acting Superintendent Rob Morgan told The Dominion Post yesterday that it may be here to stay.

"In the long term we will be discussing whether we bring it in permanently or not," he said.

He said police have found the lower tolerance is having a positive effect on the road toll and "on that basis... would be considering it very seriously".

"It will really be an evidence-based decision, it's about an assessment of whether it saves lives."

Mr Morgan said for every 1 kmph reduction there were 4 percent fewer deaths internationally.

"At the end of February, we will consider the outcomes and, if the analysis supports it, we will consider further long periods or even permanently lowering the tolerance."

A police spokeswoman says since the 4kmph limit started in 2010 holiday period crashes have fallen 46 percent.

Ministry of Transport figures for 2009 show speeding was a contributing factor in 100 fatal crashes, 361 serious injury crashes and 1274 minor injury crashes.

Transport Minister Gerry Brownlee says any change in the speed tolerance policy is an operational decision for the Police Commissioner. But if a long-term change is considered he expects to be consulted.

But motoring lobbyists say a reduction in speed may not achieve significant results - they doubt it would make a difference in the road toll, and worry it would target innocent motorists.

“The focus should be on drivers who are going excessively fast, or extremely slowly," Automobile Association motoring affairs general manager Mike Noon said.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

11 Feb 2012 09:51a.m.

QuickAnswers wrote:

@Gaz > Donnie, and Keeping Left > Posted Speed: Keeping left on a laned road Most roads in New Zealand have lanes marked on them with a white line or raised studs. When driving on a laned road, it is important to drive your vehicle within your lane. Where there are two or more lanes on your side of the centre line: * keep in the left-hand lane as much as you can * don't use the lane closest to the centre line if you will hold up other vehicles. The lane closest to the centre line should only be used when: * you want to pass another vehicle * you want to turn right * the left-hand lane is full with other traffic or is blocked.

11 Feb 2012 01:11a.m.

nick a wrote:

Belltronics RX75+, and havent had a ticket in years. These high end radar detectors seem pricey but quickly pay for themselves when having to deal with the blatant money gathering techniques of the police! I bought mine a few years ago after being ticketed for 112kph on the straights between twizal and omarama on a blue sky day with very low traffic volumes.

09 Feb 2012 07:37p.m.

Donnie wrote:

Gaz, Dan, and all contributors whose inputs read something along the lines of "I can and will drive at 105km/h all I like, it's the rest of the world who are the problem" - may I remind you of the two most highly-represented groups of people in the annual road toll? 40-59 y/o males and 25-39 y/o males, respectively. I imagine that covers most of you. Sitting around complaining that you aren't the problem won't solve it. Patience on our roads will. European comparisons are ridiculous - New Zealand roads were designed around the land, most european roads are designed despite the land. If keeping the needle at 100 is too hard and 'distracting', why not aim to keep the needle somewhere below it?

09 Feb 2012 01:31p.m.

Bruce wrote:

Acvtually I bought a car with cruise control and it is fine on long straights and on the flat but any sort of rise in the road means the car accelerates to maintain the 100ks speed but when the road levels or goes down the car exceeds this deadly 4 kph tolerance! I have no doubt the car manufacturers will support this little problem with this tiny tolerance. Also I have a Navigation device and the speedo on the car is wrong but they all appear to be, the tolerance is just plain too fine for safety. You need to watch your speedo all the time! This is a stupid idea. Funny that the Police are so tolerant of noise, prostitutes, prompt attendance of burglary but so intolerant of minor traffic infractions.

09 Feb 2012 12:38p.m.

Nathaniel wrote:

This was obvious from the start. As soon as they brought in the holiday weekend lower tolerance I knew they were building towards this.. then they made it a whole month and I knew it would be very soon... And didn't we have one of our worst holiday periods ever over Christmas/New Year in spite of this silly idea from the cops? Most responsible drivers travel from 95 - 105 km/hr... these people will be hit by this stupid rule, and it wont do anything to stop the ones that are causing the crashes.

09 Feb 2012 11:49a.m.

kane wrote:

Police making up our laws again.. When did we give them the option to choose what laws they want to use and what laws not to... They cant just make up things as they go... We are a very hilly country people will go over the limit... Seems to be revenue collecting yet again... We dont all have cruise control if we all did then fine but we dont... This will hurt those who dont greatly... Who is pushing this change ford holden??

09 Feb 2012 11:46a.m.

Al wrote:

Just who the hell are the police to be threatening anybody?
After all they're only public servants!

09 Feb 2012 11:33a.m.

Bruce wrote:

As I understand it the people will support just laws and support just enforcement officers but will lose respect for the contrary. We are heading towards a society which will not respect it's Police. This is stupid and as the headline states considered a "threat" very bad look. Police get yourselves back onside with the public. you need their support to be able to do your job! When did the Police become so intolerant?

09 Feb 2012 11:33a.m.

nigel wrote:

It will never happen; this latest announcement is a way of seeking permission. The Police did not seek Ministerial approval for their latest initiative. The Minister cannot be seen to undermine the police so we have to put up with lower speed till the end of February. However it will not become policy and the reason is our roads are an economic network. If traffic flow is slowed down too much the economy suffers. That is why the speed limit was raised from 80kph to 100kph years ago, to improve the economy and we all know how important economics are to John Key.

09 Feb 2012 11:32a.m.

Jay wrote:

Sure is just another means of gathering revenue. The tax from cigarettes must be down heaps, if we are to believe that another 2,000+ people quit in January with the last price hike. Of course they wont increase the tax on alcohol, as they are all shareholders in these businesses. Lets just hope that this decline in the speed, does not end up with the speed limit being 80kph.