Politicians look to sway swing voters

Print

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:51p.m.

PM John Key and Labour Party leader Phil Goff

PM John Key and Labour Party leader Phil Goff

By Laura Frykberg

With just over 40 days till the general election, many voters will already know who they want to see govern New Zealand.

But what about those who aren’t sure?

They’re the type of people politicians count on and make up 25 percent of the total electorate. Most of them are young voters.

But what is the deciding factor for swing voters?

“I voted for National [last election] because I asked my dad and he said to vote for National because he does,” says 21-year-old student Trudy Hewitt.

“Labour and National were just slagging each other pretty much and Pita Sharples just got up there and said, ‘this is what we are going to do, this is how we are going to do it’ and yeah, that was it,” says 21-year-old student Tim Bruce.

“My friends and family were voting for national and in my mind, I was convinced they were going to win anyway, so I wanted to put my vote somewhere else,” says design student Jeremy Bridson.

“He just knew how to speak to his audience really well, I don’t think it was specific policies or anything like that which won it over, it was just the way he communicated,” says James Hunter.

Massey University Professor Claire Robinson says these design students are typical of swing voters.

“They’re generally voters who don’t necessarily have a lot of interest or in common, or feel engaged with the political system. So they don’t necessarily think it’s important to have a consistent political view.”

But how are swing voters swayed?

Professor Robinson says political parties often ignore swingers, instead focussing on those who always choose major parties like Labour and National – but there are ways to secure swing votes.

“They attract people who are not predisposed but are more likely to be attracted by their advertising message, whether they like the political leader or not, what sort of newspaper headlines and a whole range of things that you wouldn’t necessarily class as serious political issues,” she says.

This is something Professor Robinson says – for better or worse – National has grasped.

“[Swing voters] think that national handles the economy better than Labour, they like John Key as a leader and he stands for the Kiwi dream; growing up from a state house and making a lot of money.”

But despite National’s popularity, Professor Robinson says this election’s dark horse is the Greens, whose younger MPs’ grasp on social media might sway the swingers.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

14 Oct 2011 10:27a.m.

jan.. wrote:

Stop dreaming you dreamers Enough of the Human Bloodshed and Badluck in this country, time for Mr. Key to move on and out off office and make ways for the Labour Government Mr. Goff and his Parties.. I agreed with heather bishop and for Colin Cok is a silly goose himself and for Tofix preferred the bloodshed national and its corruptions act will retire the same way as Key including those that follow that bloodshed badluck pathway..

14 Oct 2011 10:15a.m.

eddie wrote:

@ Hether Bishop -
"the disaster after disaster over 3 years including many deaths"....Hmmm are you saying the Chch Earthquake and the Pike River disaster, and the Rena grounding (no lifes lost) would not have happened if Labour were in Govt?...you REALLY do show up how labour voters think and look at life, thank you for an insight in to how the left voters minds work!

13 Oct 2011 06:56p.m.

heather bishop wrote:

after key lieing about standard and poor ,he is not fit to lead anything, a disgrace that key could lie to parliment and nz. like many are saying ,it shows how we need labour
to win the election. key is a jinx , the disaster after disaster over 3 years including many deaths shows just what a jinx this national gov't are. labour is what nz needs.

13 Oct 2011 01:28p.m.

Ricardo wrote:

Kiwis have outgrown the handout 'woe-is-me' attitude that prevails within Labour. Most people want to move forward and not be shackled by negativity that Helen left behind.

13 Oct 2011 09:42a.m.

Chris wrote:

Interestingly Labours Shane Jones on todays Marcus Lush's Radio Live AM programme with Judith Collins stated that 'Labour would have done exactly the same in the first few days on the Rena disaster'. There was a basic contingency plan that Labour would have followed also.
At least he is being honest as opposed to Goff and Winston Peters who are both attempting to cash in on this tragedy.
The left have tended to promote that 'nothing was done' which really was not the case at all. Experienced overseas salvage experts state it was the quickest response they have seen. There still maybe some damage to Key and the Nats. poularity esp. in the BOP. but they can afford to take a hit as they remain way ahead of Labour. Goff remain's unpopular - if Labour had a more charismatic leader they may have taken more votes form the Nats. The sight of Goff on the beaches attempting to help out will be seen cynically by most. The Greeen's will be the main gainers from this senario but they will steal votes from Labour who are their natural partner.
National and Key remain popular and will still form a minority Gov.T. The main issue is how happy will the Green's be to form a coalition with the Nats. I guess they may think its best to be inside the tent instead of outside. Interesting times.

13 Oct 2011 08:35a.m.

Tofik wrote:

I am was with Labour. No longer.
I listened listened and listened. No plans what so ever how to move this country forward. All I heard Nats are doing this and Nats are doing that.
Cut the story short, I want NZ to be number 1 country.
I resigned from Labour now I will support National all the way!

13 Oct 2011 05:12a.m.

Colin Cook wrote:

Mr Goff really is a silly goose. He will not admit to what is staring him in the face. He is a spent force that would better serve the interests of New Zealand by getting a real job that produces serious outcomes instead of repeating out of date Helen Clark niggles.