Robbing the paper boys to pay the Bills

Print

Fri, 25 May 2012 1:20p.m.

It's an underwhelming budget from a largely underwhelming Finance Minister - and that's just how he wants it

It's an underwhelming budget from a largely underwhelming Finance Minister - and that's just how he wants it

By Political Editor Duncan Garner

It's the penny-pinching, paper boy Budget.

A million here, a million there. No one walks away from this budget without getting hit in some way.

No matter how small - we've all gone backwards. Even the fancy guys with the planes get hit. All two of them. I bet Sir Peter Jackson is struggling to cope.

But it's the removal of the tax rebate for the paper boys and girls that looks particularly nasty.

Bill English saves about $16 million from cutting the rebate from the 68,000 paper boys and girls around the country. It's a pittance. It's mean-spirited. We need to teach our kids the value of work and the value of money.

Already some of these kids have been in touch with us. They are seriously peeved. As one said to me, when the cheque arrived it was the best day of his life. We need to encourage these kids - not smack them.

Apart from letting the air out of the tyres of the paper boys, it's an underwhelming budget from a largely underwhelming Finance Minister - and that's just how he wants it.

There's nothing big and bold from English - unless you count the $160 million for a new science and innovation institute at some stage in the future.

He doesn't want people talking about this Budget next week - I bet Labour will not shut up about it.

He's promised 154,000 jobs over the next four years, most economists wonder if that will really happen. It's bullish to say the least. Economic growth for the next year is expected to be 2.6 percent.

But last year they said it would 4 percent. It's been pegged back. The world is melting down. To get to 2.6 percent we will need Christchurch being rebuilt at a faster pace than last year.

Activity there is not what the Government had hoped. It's why the deficit is smaller at $8.4 billion - money set aside to rebuild Christchurch hasn't been spent.

So that's the best-case scenario really. The downside scenario is uglier and very possible given Europe. Then we'd face a $25 billion hole in the economy, $8 billion less revenue, higher interest rates and high unemployment.

So Budget 2012 is over - a mean little document that takes a bit from all of us - without hurting any of us in a terminal way. No one will need medication and thank god for that because don't forget the trip to the chemist will cost more too.

It's not slash and burn. It's not big. It's not bold. It's not creative. But it is perhaps quite cunning and clever. Because National is trimming and inching its way to a tiny little surplus which is entirely vulnerable and means absolutely zero.

And that's symbolic of this budget. A zero.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

26 May 2012 12:03p.m.

Mike wrote:

They need to learn that excessive social spending has to come from somewhere, and it will be those same go-getters who got jobs as kids expected to pay for the bludgers of NZ who wont get off their backsides to help themselves, let alone NZ.

If its so much better overseas for those on welfare, why dont they move? Greece looks like a good place with higher social policy than NZ - Oh wait, they need bailing out as excesses need to be paid by someone!

The Lefts suggestions would just make us follow Greece faster to bankruptcy as a nation. Have not seen even one policy from the left to address the excessive social spending in NZ.

25 May 2012 07:18p.m.

cindy wrote:

key English and the national party ,robbing the children so they and their rich mates can have a tax cut . disgusting , plus the interest we pay on the loans for those mental tax cuts .we need manufacturing in new zealand not a do nothing government . manufacturing and exports equal real wealth and growth and lower unemployment . manufacturing lead growth . but they closed all the plants and factories down over the last 25 years .

25 May 2012 03:19p.m.

Greg wrote:

Someones gotta pay Johns in the other ex PMs in office 6 years a life time benifit for the position. If that little gem doesnt show how self corrupting our politics are what can, and why they have a lkower standing than used car salepeople, honourable, i think not.

Duncan Garner's Entries

Previous12345Next