3News » Home

Opinion: Chris Carter's Globetrotting - $131,000!

Chris Carter (L) Chris Carter (L)
Wed, 07 Oct 2009 11:37a.m.

It seems Chris Carter as a Minister had a total disregard for the public purse.

When the international travel figures for the six months to June 2008 were released two months ago, Carter had clocked up $83,087 heading abroad - or so we thought.

But after last night's investigation on 3 News, we now know it was more than $131,000 in just six months. And that's just the international travel!

In Carter's defence - and lets get this out there now - all his international travel was approved by his friend, the Prime Minister at the time, Helen Clark.

So what did Carter achieve on these trips? I don't know. I have asked the Cabinet Office to release his travel reports. They are working on it apparently, but we won't get the reports for at least another week.

So let’s look at where Carter went, who he took and what it cost.

Remember this guy wasn't the Foreign Minister. He wasn't the Prime Minister - although he was standing in for her on some trips we are told. And he wasn't the Trade Minister.

In January 2008 he went to the UK between the 7-9 January and Spain from the 15-17 January. He took his partner Peter Kaiser. Airfares cost $7246.00. Other costs, like accommodation and meals came to $9,969.92. Did he have a European holiday in between appointments? What did he do on behalf of the NZ taxpayer? Who paid?

In April he went to Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia and China for 11 days. Again he took his partner Peter Kaiser. He also took his press secretary Michael Gibbs. Airfares cost $28,696.00 Other costs totalled $28,712.22. All up - that's more than $57,000. I never knew South-East Asia could be so expensive.

To be fair Carter was representing the Prime Minister at the 2008 Asia-Pacific Interfaith Cooperation for Peace and Harmony Conference in Cambodia. He then went to China to join Helen Clark and Phil Goff for the signing of the Free Trade Agreement in Beijing. I was there too. I covered it. Why Carter, Kaiser and Gibbs were there continues to beat me. There were a lot bags to carry though. He and his party then went to Thailand and Vietnam for bi-lateral and portfolio visits. 

He went to Australia in April for two days. No big deal right? But how come flights for him and a staff member cost $4526.00? Try and get a flight across the Tasman for that amount? Is he taking the piss? Did he hire the plane out? Who books this stuff?

Then in June Carter, Kaiser and his press secretary went to Chile and Peru for the week for the APEC Education Ministers' meeting. The three spent more than $38,000 on airfares to get there and just short of $10,000 on expenses. $48,000 all up. But $38,000 on airfares is phenomenal. I do remember covering APEC myself in Peru at the same time - we flew economy class through the US to cut costs. We looked at flying direct, but going through the States was cheaper and we were in the middle of a recession and this was the only cost effective to do it. We actually had to take three flights - a leg through Miami on the way back to cut costs. The return flight cost TV3 just under $3,000.

So Carter's bill tops $131,000. It is embarrassingly large, no one is questioning that.

Labour is doing only a half-arsed job defending him as well. There's a lot of disquiet in the Labour caucus about Carter. He hasn't been labelled the Minister for Overseas Travel for nothing. But I guess this just shows that Carter, and perhaps those who made his bookings, had a total disregard for the public purse. Perhaps it's systematic within Parliament. If it's someone else's money, then who cares - that seems to be the prevailing attitude around here.

John Key has stopped husbands and wives travelling with Ministers, unless they pay for it themselves. It's a loose ban for the first 12 months of his reign. And even that may be lifted soon. 

But Parliament and Ministers and their staff need to get serious.  

Ordinary taxpayers work bloody hard for their wages. An overseas trip for most Kiwis is a privilege. Carter and all his colleagues across the board need to be reminded of that.  

$131,000 in just six months is two and half times the average wage.  

So when staff and Ministers are booking their next flights, remember who is paying.

By Duncan Garner

Duncan Garner is the 3 News Political Editor based in Wellington. Here he offers his views and commentary on the developments of New Zealand's politics from within the Press Gallery.

 
Subscribe to this blog by email
  

Duncan Garner's Entries

Comments [21]

Gay
12 May 2010 10:52p.m.

I'm an open gay men and some of the public are taking this story as homophobia? It's wrong for Chris to go out spending so much money on travel let alone taking his partner everywhere in difficult times. We all know gay men knows how to spend money but using our money to travel plus taking Peter everywhere is bit much. It's Chris's fault that Peter is getting the attention because everywhere Chris goes Peter is there and Duncan hottie is just reporting the story. gay people likes to stick together and back each others backs... I hope my gay community realises Chris and his partner have overused his minister perks.

Craig A. Wills
08 Oct 2009 4:32p.m.

Is this a Carter witch-hunt to boost your ratings? Has very much of a David Benson-Pope sound to me. There seems to be little objectivity in the reporting of this whole issue.

Kenneth
08 Oct 2009 10:55a.m.



Yes, in answer he IS taking the piss.
Disgusting.
And the claims of homophobia...get over yourselves!
Greed & waste is greed & waste. Hard to divert attention from that.
Shameless.
How can a 2 day trip to Australia cost so much?
Answer: When you treat yourself to only the very best!

These expenses are not justified.
Even the trips themselves would be hard to justify.
What is the price tag for the 'interfaith peace conference'?
No BS...this is just an excuse for a luxury trip.
I think ordinary folk are not stupid enough to believe such symposiums mean 'hard work' or 'no rest' for an MP.
He is just warming a seat and eating the catered food after all.

If that is hard work then I would like to swap places with him.

as was said: "If he was doing Helen Clarks work, then who was doing Chris Carters work?"

James
08 Oct 2009 10:27a.m.

I would have to disagree with you Mattie - this isn't a homophobic rant. It just so happens that Carter has spent an inordinate amount of money on travel - especially for someone who wasn't the foreign or trade minister. I remember there being stories and comments about Taito Phillip Field's partner still receiving travel allowances - not as big a deal as the amounts weren't as high but the story was still there. If a heterosexual minister had spent a similar amount I am sure this would have been covered in the same way. I remember criticisms of Helen Clark's husband that were similar.

Andrew and Julia
07 Oct 2009 10:40p.m.

Duncan, this is not journalism but feels more like some sort of campaign to boost your own ego. Carter was travelling on government business. Your focus on his partner is being done in a way that we feel would not be done with a straight partner. We agree with Mattie - it is a "tabloid style beatup" and "cheap".

Lee
07 Oct 2009 9:58p.m.

Good for you Duncan to expose this type of greed that is being exhibited by some MP's. We could do with more journalists like you who are not afriad and will not be bullied. Why is it that everytime Chris Carter is in the news in a negative way he tries to discredit the issue and the journalist by turning it into an anti-gay issue. Keep digging and bring out the truth of these trips.

Invemtory2
07 Oct 2009 9:51p.m.

Carter seems to have picked up a new nickname around the blogosphere today - Chris "Columbus" Carter. In light of what you have chronicled Duncan, it seems a most fitting sobriquet!

Allan
07 Oct 2009 9:42p.m.

I dont care if Carter has funny tastes in partners as so of rush to defend, but I do care where my money is used and scattered about like confety. It is about time that we had a report on all "expenses" paid to those less than Kosher in the misnamed BEEHIVE. Do any of you think it will? would any of you vote to take a substantial pay cut. Even if you know full well that you are being grossly overpaid. as the majority of MP's are. And they make the rules in the Democracy.

Mattie
07 Oct 2009 9:39p.m.

Yes it's a lot of money and yes it might be assumed Chris Carter is ripping off the tax payer but in the absence of substantive context i.e. what the trips were for and, more importantly, what they acheived, Garner's story looks like a tabloid style beatup. Waiting a week to get this info could have made a stronger and more important story - with plenty of followup opportunities, but the temptation to get "two bites at the cherry" was obviously too much for Garner and the News Editor. NZ demonstrates too readily the mean-spirited politics of envy and, in doing so, we often miss the main point. For example whether Paul Reynold deserves his $5m in terms of Telecom's current performance is the salient point, not just the fact that he's earning a whopping salary by NZ stds. The tone of Garner's story on Chris Carter, plus the chosen pix, definitely ring homophobic bells to this viewer. Cheap stuff alas.

Hugh Young
07 Oct 2009 6:59p.m.

If Duncan Garner is NOT targetting Carter because he is gay, perhaps in his next report he might NOT mention Carter's partner by name yet again and NOT include that shot of them drinking pink champagne yet again. This is dog-whistle stuff. Has any news item named Bill English's wife and kids, who share his Ministerial house and its costs to the taxpayer? Maybe Carter did spend up on travel, but Annette King makes a good case that he went where Helen told him, as her representative, with precious little time off. And John, sexual orientation is not a "persuasion" or "beliefs". Your own prejudice is showing.

Post a comment

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:


3News Video 3News Audio