Pork Board to introduce welfare label

Print

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:17p.m.

The Pork Board is expected to introduce a new welfare label on supermarket shelves next month

The Pork Board is expected to introduce a new welfare label on supermarket shelves next month

By Jessica Rowe

As consumer concern increases over buying pork the Pork Board is expected to introduce a new welfare label on supermarket shelves next month, but consumer representatives are warning it could be deceptive.

Intensive pig farming has been a contentious issue following comedian Mike King's revelations about the widespread use of sow stalls.

Suddenly, consumers wanted to know more about the origin of their meat, and the welfare of the animals that produced it.

The Pork Board responded by developing a label declaring "100 percent NZ Pork welfare approved" and it's expected to be launched next month.

But Consumer New Zealand believes the label is misleading.

“I think it is particularly deceiving,” says Sue Chetwin of Consumer NZ. “It doesn't give the consumers a choice about how the pigs have been farmed. They could have been in sow crates or farrowing crates and the consumer is none the wiser.”

Ms Chetwin says it makes it impossible for consumers to differentiate between free range and intensively farmed pork.

“The consumers would have to really search them out because of the labelling that the pork industry is putting on all the other pork farmers.”

Free range farmers 3 News has spoken to want nothing to do with it.

“It doesn't help the consumer in anyway, it tells them that the product is to the welfare code that exists at the moment approved by the act is being complied with but that's it,” says Gregor Fyfe of Freedom Farms.

“We know consumers are looking for more than that.”

Mr Fyfe's Freedom Farms brand uses the SPCA Blue Tick which specifically bans the use of sow stalls and farrowing crates.

The Pork Board declined to speak to 3 News but in a statement said it was “developing a labelling system that would ultimately deliver consumers choice”.

Animal welfare groups want sow stalls banned and they say the Pork Board is out of touch with public opinion.

“Our own government is looking at banning sow stalls on the grounds of cruelty and yet the Pork Board is going to put welfare approved labelling on pork products that come out of this system,” says Hans Kriek of SAFE.

Sow stalls have already been banned in Britain and parts of the United States.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

06 Oct 2010 11:49a.m.

gregor wrote:

Consumers have all the power in this issue.The SPCA blue tick label is our independent guarantee of how the pork has been farmed .By ensuring we only buy pork with this label we can be sure we are supporting brands who do not profit from intensive farming and are farming without sow crates ,farrowing crates or barren concrete fattening pens.
Freedom Farms was the first brand to gain SPCA certification and is available nationwide in most supermarkets and specialty stores now.

01 Oct 2010 08:28a.m.

Consuner wrote:

What is al the fuss about, all the people that have replied have got hidden agendas, vegans animal welfare activists, come on wake up NZ, This consumer would much prefer to be NZ produced and not faced with the choice of buying my pork from supermarket shelves from places like China, vietnam or USA who dont even recognise Animal welfare of any sort, sorry 100% NZ made will always win for me.

01 Oct 2010 12:02a.m.

Miss Marples wrote:

I detect a rather large and smelly dose of hypocrisy by the Pork Board. I suggest all concerned should stage a protest outside their offices to show them we are not quite as silly as they think we are.

30 Sep 2010 10:16p.m.

bex wrote:

just cant trust the meat industry, eaiser and cheaper to go vegetarian :)

30 Sep 2010 08:59p.m.

Jordan wrote:

These labels are completely meaningless, and show the error of going for a New Welfarist angle. Animal Welfare groups that create distinctions really are worsening the issue. We kill 56 Billion land animals annually (UN FOA 2007 report PDF http://bit.ly/56billion ) , and for what? Profit, and pleasure. Please, if we truly care for animals, please dont hurt them. I promote Veganism as its the LEAST we can do for animals. To learn more about Veganism, please visit http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/ or for NZ specific details, http://nzveganpodcast.blogspot.com/ http://fftradio.wordpress.com/ http://nzdairy.webs.com/

30 Sep 2010 07:26p.m.

Sue wrote:

Do they seriously think this will fool people into buying their product? Its fairly clear that public opinion is against sow stalls & bad conditions for animals in general - the Pork board must be aware of this,but rather than improve conditions they prefer to try & mislead the public. A bad move on their part; I believe they've misjudged public feeling about this subject & by bringing in these deliberately misleading labels they're showing all too clearly their contempt for consumers. I'll stick with the free range product.

30 Sep 2010 05:01p.m.

Mark wrote:

A tick of welfare by the NZ Pork Board will have as much meaning to me as a Heart Foundation tick on a tin of Milo.

30 Sep 2010 03:56p.m.

Ruz wrote:

I agree that the Pork Board's labelling is vague. I think Consumers simply want to know if pigs have been reared in sow crates or not. it's either yes or no.

30 Sep 2010 03:43p.m.

Ty Williams wrote:

Wonder if they'll be giving away free gps tracking devices with each pack of bacon... lol

30 Sep 2010 01:51p.m.

ALAN wrote:

I suggest we all start looking for the blue tick and I notice the pork board did not inform us about the spca tick