Ports of Auckland contracting out work while continuing negotiations

Print

Mon, 09 Jan 2012 6:30p.m.

Ports of Auckland wants to bring in competition and several labour providers

Ports of Auckland wants to bring in competition and several labour providers

By Tony Field

The Ports of Auckland has upped the ante in its industrial dispute with the New Zealand Maritime Union.

It says although it will continue negotiations with the union it is going to go ahead with a proposal to contract out more than 300 jobs.

Relations between the managers of the Auckland port and the Maritime Union were already at a low point this morning but got even worse as the day unfolded.

This morning union boss Garry Parsloe confirmed his members would go ahead with another 48 hour strike, saying that any move to “casualise” the work force would destroy job security.

“If you casualise the whole port, or have too much flexibility then the family suffers for that,” says Mr Parsloe. “You don’t know whether you are working or not working, you are waiting by a phone and it undermines family values.”

This afternoon the port’s chief executive Tony Gibson announced the company would proceed with plans to contact out its entire workforce.

“What we want to do is bring competition and have several providers of labour,” he said.

The Auckland Council-owned port has lost two major customers, Maersk and Fonterra, and Mayor Len Brown has been urging the two sides to sort out their differences.

“My view is that the collective is the way forward in the present scenario,” he says.

Mr Gibson says Southern Star has moved $20 million, saying “we need change, we need to change now”.

The port will brief workers on its plans tomorrow.

The port company says if it does go ahead and contract out the jobs it will try to offer work to the existing staff but it is inevitable there will be redundancies.

Mediation is supposed to resume on Thursday after the two day strike finishes.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

10 Jan 2012 04:51p.m.

David wrote:

'Pondering' seems to have an over active imagination without any awareness of current reality. For 'Ponderings' information, most of our best performing NZ schools are already 'contracted out' at a fraction of the public schools costs. Our agriculture is virtually 100% privately owned with no unionism getting it's grubby little hands on things to spoil its efficiency. The Dairy Industry likewise is also privately owned and contracted mostly with Fonterra the largest and most efficient Dairy Industry in the world that contributes considerably to every level of our economy. Public Hospitals contract out much of their supporting services and private hospitals have always co-existed alongside these. That said, I do concede the police could certainly do with some tidying up and contracting out some of their functions might free them up to do a more professional job. Quite frankly, it is of little concern to most people who may be contracted to provide services as long as results are as contracted to be provided with a consistency and reliability of what needs to be done and within the accepted tenders costs. If at any stage results are not provided as contracted, new tenders should be called for, as would also happen at the end of each contracted period.

10 Jan 2012 03:08p.m.

Paul wrote:

As an Auckland local body rate payer, I am sick and tired of overpaid, under worked waterfront unionists trying to get even greedier at my expense. 26 hours a week for $96,000 a year is already way over the top and enough is enough. Responsible wage and salaried earners have to work for their money and wharfies should be made to do the same. Who cares who supplies what services as long as they are accountable and provide the services they are contracted to deliver at the price they tendered to supply that service for. I for one, say bring back some honest competition to the industry.

10 Jan 2012 08:17a.m.

AT wrote:

POAL has no choice, either you lose the workers or the traders(customers)...

09 Jan 2012 09:04p.m.

pondering wrote:

So the Ports Of Auckland had no intention of negotiating any deal with workers. They intended to contract out all the work and are now charging ahead with that agenda. Was the negotiation process just a formality that ha to be given a token attempt. What will be next? Our schools. Our hospitals. Our police Our agriculture and dairy industry. ?? Who will these jobs be contracted to??