Power’s legal aid cuts unpopular in law community

Print

Wed, 13 Apr 2011 6:08p.m.

Justice Minister Simon Power (NZPA file)

Justice Minister Simon Power (NZPA file)

By Patrick Gower

The cost of justice is about to change, with the Government taking an axe to the legal aid system - which provides help for many of those who come before the courts.

The Government intends to cut $18 million from the legal aid budget each year, and it is signalling other cuts as well.

There will also be means testing and a new entrance fee for anyone involved in a family or civil case.

Martin Oraha has just been up on a drink-driving charge.

He says cutbacks to legal aid means if he faces charges again he might have to plead guilty - even if he is innocent.

“I'd just have to plead guilty, even though it was a false accusation. I’ll just have to plead guilty because I can't afford to get a lawyer,” he says.

The cuts are the work of Justice Minister Simon Power.

He is trying to contain a legal aid bill that has ballooned from $111 million a year to $172 million, in just three years – that is a 55 percent increase.

“Where previously we have operated an open cheque book policy across a range of jurist dictions, that has to stop,” says Mr Power.

So Mr Power’s main change is means testing and the bar is low.

If you are a single adult earning $22,000 a year or supporting a family while on the average wage of $50,000, then you will have to pick up the bill.

“If people have to plead for financial reasons for charges, for charges they don't think have committed, that kind of groundswell can have long term consequences for our community,” says Jonathan Temm, of the Law Society.

Mr Power says the state will still fund a duty solicitor or a truly expensive case.

Opponents say justice is about choice.

“Now you will have a lawyer foisted on you that you don't know or trust,” says lawyer Catriona McClennan.

Independent MP Hone Harawira has condemned the cuts.

“Anything that is gonna make poor people not get a lawyer is going to mean poor people don't get justice,” he says.

The other changes will include

- Expanding the public defence service to take over from "car boot" lawyers

- A $100 "user charge" for anyone who wants to take family and civil cases

- Tightening the use of "lawyer for child" and legal aid in family cases

“We've seen couples arguing in court over the length of a child's overseas holiday or who should pay for the petrol in a certain circumstance. That is not what this scheme is designed to do,” says Mr Power.

And now Mr Power continues a fight of his own - getting the legal profession to accept his reforms.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

13 Apr 2011 10:59p.m.

Kim wrote:

Surely the fundamental role of a democratic govt and its founding princile is to provide justice to all regardless of position in life. $22000? that basicly says if you are on a benefit you will be covered but if you work and contribute to the tax that pays for those lawyers you pay. Seems a little unfair to me. I think it should be in stages like our tax system. you pay 20% from $22000-35000 30% from $35000-50000 etc would make more sense. a little bit more work could even have different funding levels for different uses of legal aid. but this is just too much. Does this mean the police now have to say ...you no longer have the right to remain silent but you do have the right to consult a laywer should you be able to afford one..when reading you your rights?

13 Apr 2011 09:03p.m.

Grant wrote:

Hay ! heres an idea - don't commit any crimes - problem solved.

13 Apr 2011 07:55p.m.

heading to aussie wrote:

if the police did their job properly first and waited till they had the evidence first before arresting someone and then only looking for evidence to prosecute that person there would be less people claiming legal aid. if you are found not guilty does the crown pay for the lawyer that legal aid said no to.how many cases drag on because the police are under funded and dont have the personal to proceed and are only dismissed at the last moment when they could have been dismissed at the start.what about the lawyers that drag it out.head to aussie at least the wage you get payed would cover a lawyer or quite your job and earn under the threshold and get legal aid.and they say we arnt a 3rd world nation yea right

13 Apr 2011 07:18p.m.

CLIVE wrote:

WITH ITS INCREASE IN GST AND USER PAYS THIS NATIONAL GOVENMENT TAX YOU MORE AND GIVE BACK LESS IN SERVICES , YOUR GETTING RIPPED OF BIGTIME . SMILES AND LITS THATS KEY .WITH A BANK BALANCE OF OVER 50 MILLION KEYS NOT REPRESENTING AT LEAST 70% OF THE COUNTRY . NOW HES GOT BUSINESS ON WELFARE AND YOU ARE PAYING .