Prices up, limits down - alcohol laws come under the microscope - Story - National - 3 News
3News » Home
Full Story

Prices up, limits down - alcohol laws come under the microscope

8 comments | Post Comment Email Print Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:48p.m.

The Law Commission is proposing some sobering recommendations to change the way we drink. The price would go up, for a start, and the legal drinking age would also rise by a year or two.

As for drivers, the breath alcohol level would be lowered.

According to the Law Commission it is what we are drinking, how we are drinking it, when, where and at what age.

Raising the drinking age to 19 or 20 is one of the commission's preferred policy options, and it was getting some support on the streets of Wellington tonight.

"Eighteen is quite young, and that means that also 16-year-olds can get alcohol," said one person 3 News spoke to.

"The presence of so many 18 to 19-year-olds in the bars is making it quite violent, quite messy," said another.

Those young people start arriving in emergency rooms late every Friday and Saturday night.

"We see a lot of intoxicated patients," says Prof Mike Ardagh of the Christchurch Emergency Department. "On our worst days nearly a third of our patients are intoxicated."

Treating alcohol related injuries and policing the problem all costs money. Right now tax revenue from alcohol equals $795 million per year. The total cost of alcohol abuse is said to be $5.296 billion. 

Sir Geoffrey Palmer of the Law Commission says increasing taxes on alcohol is one way to redress the imbalance.

"The strange thing is that 10 percent of the drinkers are drinking 50 percent of the alcohol. They would be paying the most."

Lowering the breath alcohol limit for young drivers is another of the commission's positions. Under the current law an adult on a full licence is allowed 80mcg of alcohol per 100ml of blood - that could be cut to just 50.

And for anyone under 20, that figure would be zero.

"The Law Commission's recommendations have noo been formalised yet. That will happen when their completed review is passed to Government sometime in July.

But if today's announcement is anything to go by, that report is likely to counsel strongly in favour of sweeping changes to the way alcohol is bought and consumed in this country.

3 News

Comments [8]

Brian
25 Apr 2009 10:27p.m.

Totally agree with the idea of raising the age limit.
Realistically speaking looking at all the alcohol fulled people causing disoerderly behaviour on Friday nights is just unacceptable. And as a member of the police, it's about time this legislation is put into place.

nigel
25 Apr 2009 11:29a.m.

I think alcohol is a problem we can do nothing about! Tinkering with laws will only make peoples lives more difficult. Bit like speed cameras achieve nothing and just annoy drivers, spurring them on to drive ever faster. Alcohol has been a problem for millennia, but we like it. A brave Politician should simply point this rather obvious fact out, rather than waste public money on an unsolvable problem .

Andrew
25 Apr 2009 9:04a.m.

The simple “all or none” approaches traditionally favoured by our legislators will not only continue to be unpopular but are doomed to fail. Instead of focusing on drinking age and price we should be looking at where and how alcohol is sold, where it may be consumed and only lastly by whom.

Alex
25 Apr 2009 6:58a.m.

The best way to tackle the alcohol problem is to do nothing and let the problem subside over time.

1. Alcohol price rises will hit the pockets of responsible drinkers while those who spend most of their pay packet on alcohol will be unphased to spend a few extra pennies more per drink.
2. Rising the age of purchase doesn't solve anything as youths will get their parents or older friends/siblings to buy it for them. It also disadvantages responsible youth drinkers who are already deemed responsible enough to vote, pay tax, drive, join the armed forces or have sex, but can't buy a beer at their local pub.
3. Lowering blood alcohol limits disadvantages those who know their limits well already while those who just don't give a damn will continue to drive drunk even 3-4 times over the limit.

All three ideas suggested by the law commission only penalise the majority of responsible alcohol drinkers in New Zealand. The ones in the other category will continue to drink themselves into stupour and misbehave.

I do support one thing, make it an offense to be intoxicated in a public place. As far as I know, if you are intoxicated all that happenes is that the police put you in the drunk tank at the station to monitor you until you are conscious enough to look after yourself and see you on your way. How about issuing fines to those people who drink way more than their body can handle and who also put themselves at risk as a result. This suggestion actually deals with the drinkers who are the reason why this country has such a bad binge drinking reputation.

Sefo
25 Apr 2009 2:07a.m.

About time they overlooked the drinking age policy. Especially in this generation, too many young teenagers getting involved in all sorts of trouble from alcohol, as a result, face tragic consequences. Just the other day, I was parked outside my favourite takeaway shop when I witnessed two young teens (12-14) walking along the footpath, both drinking 12% Cody's, highly intoxicated and were verbally abusive.

Ridiculous!. And that goes for the parents!

John, Lower Hutt
25 Apr 2009 1:36a.m.

I don't see why the alcohol limit for driving should be lowered. The current limit is about 2.5 glasses of beer. This limit has been greatly surpassed in accidents where alcohol has been a factor. Don't revise legislation for the sake of keeping yourselves employed.

Stephen
25 Apr 2009 12:25a.m.

Warren, if your english is anything to go by, i would be putting the drinking age up and raising the school leaving age. have a nice day

warren
24 Apr 2009 11:06p.m.

y on the eve of anzac day would one d talking about rasing the drinking age when alot of nzer's were 18 & under when thay lost ther lives in those wars lam 2 the slurter @ 18 so y is it wronge 4 u to hav a beer @ 18

Post a comment

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:


3News Video 3News Audio

Post your opinion

3News -
Comments (40)

Are John Key’s tax changes fair?

So GST is going up a property loop hole will be closed and the top tax rate will be cut. Has John Key made good decisions here?...

Special Offers: