3News » Home
Full Story

Privacy Commissioner passes on complaint against Bennett

1 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
Solo mum Natasha Fuller laid the complaint after Paula Bennett released her benefit details to news media (NZPA)

Solo mum Natasha Fuller laid the complaint after Paula Bennett released her benefit details to news media (NZPA)

Tue, 22 Jun 2010 6:43p.m.

Privacy Commissioner Marie Shroff has closed her investigation into a privacy complaint against Social Development Minister Paula Bennett and referred the matter to the Director of Human Rights Proceedings.

Solo mum Natasha Fuller laid the complaint after Ms Bennett released her benefit details to news media when she complained about cuts to her training incentive allowance.

Ms Shroff said the parties were unable to reach a settlement over the complaint.

However, there was "sufficient substance" for her to refer the matter to the director Robert Hesketh, which she had done.

Ms Shroff said she would not make further comment while the matter was with the director.

If a settlement cannot be made following a complaint to the commissioner she can give an opinion on the matter.

Her opinion is not legally binding, but is taken seriously.

It was normal for the commissioner to pass complaints to the director, where settlement was not reached.

The director can in turn decide whether or not it should be taken to the Human Rights Review Tribunal.

His process is separate from the commissioner's and proceedings start afresh.

Ms Fuller has said she would not be making public statements on the issue.

Ms Bennett's office said she was disappointed they could not reach a settlement through the commissioner process.

She could not comment further as it was a legal matter.

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [1]

Kim
23 Jun 2010 4:10p.m.

U&sually this type of complaint only goes to the director if the accused party refuses to pay compo. So now we will end up paying for her legal fee's as well as director charges (which will be huge) and no matter what the outcome the taxpayer will pay for it one way or another. (ether the MP's slush fund for legal defence or through the benefit of the women involved) All coz this cow will not acept she did wrong ...Remember if she didn't have a case to answer the commisioner would not have forwarded it to the director. just give her 10 grand it will be cheaper by far..but oh no this cow would have to admit wrongdoing...

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio