• Full Story

Proposal to make more credit information available

Print

Tue, 17 May 2011 9:42a.m.

Proposed changes to credit reporting rules would allow ongoing reporting of a person's repayment history, such as whether monthly credit card, mortgage or utility payments were made on time.

Access to the information would largely be limited to credit providers subject to an independent dispute resolution scheme that could act on complaints about credit practices.

Notifying the proposed changes to the Credit Reporting Privacy Code today, Privacy Commissioner Marie Shroff said amendments would introduce a more comprehensive style of credit reporting, closer to the practice in the United States.

The changes would also enable victims of identity fraud to "freeze" their credit records.

"Identity fraud is a serious issue and this is a practical response for individuals. I have proposed a way of limiting the risk of someone taking out credit in another person's name," Ms Shroff said.

The change would enable consumers to have their credit report suppressed if they were a victim of fraud. The listing of defaults under $100 would also be prohibited.

Overall, the amendment marked the establishment of a more comprehensive credit reporting system.

Now, information was added to credit reports at the time people sought credit and when they defaulted on obligations. The amendment would mean there would be continual reporting on a person's repayments whenever they held credit.

"There is no doubt that this would be a more intrusive regime, but I have tried to ensure that there will be benefits to individuals and the community, as well as to business interests," Ms Shroff said.

The package of changes would help banks and finance companies make robust credit decisions in an environment that demanded quick decisions on credit applications.

"Credit reporters have argued that these changes will assist lenders to behave responsibly and allow them to offer competitive and accessible credit to consumers."

The changes were no yet fixed, and Ms Shroff said she would like to hear views on whether they were worthwhile, whether the balance struck was the right one and if protections and safeguards would be sufficient.

John Roberts, managing director of credit checking agency Veda Advantage said his company supported all the directions taken in the amendment, including consumer safeguards and the limitation on listing defaults under $100.

The reform would "quietly underpin the economy as it climbs out of recession", Mr Roberts said.

"Lenders will be more confident in lending money when they have been able to make more thorough assessments of a borrowers' ability to pay."

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

07 Jun 2011 12:33p.m.

Concerned citizen wrote:

In this current financial market, we seem to be ever so keen to protect the rights of the creditors, but not the debtors. If this is being put in place we need to consider the rights of the debtor to keeping their affairs out of the public eye. We seem to live in a country where we don't care of the rights of the general public, but rather seem to want to protect the organizations that seem to charge whatever they want, and treat consumers as bad as they care to. If we are to add legislation to allow more intrusive tactics from creditors, perhaps we had better put legislation in place to protect the general public from harsh or oppressive collection practices. Remember NZ was dragged into the recession by the countries and companies that have these policies in place, did it really help them? It is about time we promoted business ethics and start punishing businesses that lend to people that are already overcommitted. Before we spend more time, and money to support the collectors and lenders, perhaps we should spend some time and money to protect people from the 'we don't care about the debtor' tactics of some of the collectors. NZ is overdue for an introduction of legislation such as the FDCPA that protects US citizens from repeated abuse from collection companies. The Government seems to have become confused with the idea of who they represent, you who sit in parliament this is a message to you You need to wake up and realize who you are and what your job is. You are caretakers of this country, put in place to look after the rights, welfare, and general wellbeing of the people you serve.

21 May 2011 11:50p.m.

Fellowes wrote:

In the light of the latest downgrade of leading NZ banks, I take it the public will also be given the right to scrutinise their balance sheets, as well? Or is it just ordinary folk who are being monitored?