• Full Story

Proposed 'sickie' laws encourage culture of mistrust – Unite

Print

Mon, 19 Jul 2010 1:16p.m.

Unite spokesperson Matt McCarten says “good management” is all that is needed to stop employees repeatedly skiving off

Unite spokesperson Matt McCarten says “good management” is all that is needed to stop employees repeatedly skiving off

By Chris Whitworth

The head of the Unite union has slammed National’s crackdown on sick days, saying they are "unworkable" and encourage a culture of "mistrust" in the workplace.

“What it reinforces is control,” says Unite spokesman Matt McCarten.

“That people can’t be trusted and need to be controlled.”

Speaking at the National Party Conference on Sunday, Prime Minister John Key proposed sweeping employment reforms.

In particular employers would gain the right to request a medical certificate for a single day off. The cost of this would be borne by the employer.

What's your opinion on the proposed laws?

Mr McCarten says “good management” is all that is needed to stop employees repeatedly skiving off work.

“If there is a pattern [in sick days] any employer worth their salt will take them in and talk about it,” he says.

Under the proposed law, employers can request a medical certificate up to three days after the sick day. Mr McCarten says this presents a fundamental flaw.

“It is unworkable unless they see the doctor on the same day,” he says.

Health officials have echoed his concerns, saying constant requests for medical certificates would congest medical centres.

Read the health sector's full response to the proposed employment laws.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

23 Jul 2010 01:52p.m.

steve wrote:

The only people who will be impacted by any changes are those that always try to screw the system. Fake sickies are common and most employers know who the good and the bad staff are in this regard. As usual the unions support the trouble makers.

19 Jul 2010 02:27p.m.

Graham wrote:

If anything needs to be changed with the sick leave days it needs to be access to a reasonable number of days off for sick leave, and if you have to produce a certificate from the doctor then so be it. 5 days sick leave is a joke - your standard cold last 10 days and if you can't afford 10 days off then you come back to work when you should still be in bed spreading your germs and causing other people to get sick and take sick leave. I do not believe that annual leave should be used to make up for sick days off. It’s wrong and if you are sick you are sick, no one plans to be sick, we are biological organisms and from time to time we get sick, employers should allow you to get better properly and giving you only 5 days of sick leave is nothing but a token gesture. A reasonable amount would be 10 or 15 days, Non accrual .

19 Jul 2010 02:27p.m.

peter wrote:

Wake up and smell the fish!!!! There are a huge number of fake sickies taken especially among younger people. As with many other issues there seems to be a total reluctance to face reality - there is a significant portion of people who are not able to attend work but on the same day are able to socialise, watch a movie, go out, etc etc. Even so, I wouldn't bother with both a sick day and 90 day reform - 90 days is enough to sort out who is who. My only other comment is about the medical profession - they will just do what they do now, sign medical certificates without any evidence based on what they are told - I have had countless employees who have been "sick" go to the doctor days later and say they had a sore back last tuesday, and the doctor just writes the certificate out without any evidence. So they shouldn't protest too much, they dont do this particular job well anyway and just stick their hand out for money so they are to be considered too highly in this debate