3News » Home

Racist filmmaker – too clever?

Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:01a.m.

By Philip Patston

I'm sure Perth filmmaker Simon Barker was trying to be terribly clever by trying to "create an awareness of the issues faced by Aboriginals" by showing white Australians dressed as Aborigines, drinking and engaging in criminal activity.

Sadly he was too clever. In reality, he was at best, naive and at worst, stupid to think he could fight racism with racism.

It reminds me of the episode of The Office where the staff member who used a wheelchair was left sitting in the stairwell during a fire evacuation. Everyone just raced passed her. It caused a bit of a stir in the disabled community in the UK and I think I remember Ricky Gervais defending the scene by saying he wanted to create awareness.

Hilarious? No. Clever? Not even. The scene only served to reinforce bad behaviour.

Avatar is another failed attempt to point out human folly, this time on the big screen. The 30 or so minutes of rampant destruction of the Na'vi's Home Tree on Pandora was meant to highlight our blatant disrepect of the environment.

But really, it just glorified it.

Burgeoning reality shows like Noise Control and Police Ten 7 mean that now, if you behave antisocially, you're likely to get on TV. Good reason to do so, because then you can watch yourself and have a laugh with your mates.

And then there are the crime shows – CSI, Criminal Minds and the like – which show people how to think like a killer. Awesome.

I am constantly amazed at the way we use screens, which are becoming more and more prevalent, to depict violence, destruction, prejudice, rudeness and irresponsibility. Then we wonder why we live in a society where these are becoming bigger and bigger problems.

The power of the screen is huge and I'm not sure if we are aware that, where once screen media reflected reality, it's now creating it. I don't want to be a kill joy – I enjoy the occasional over the top display of graphic violence to get the old adrenalin pumping. But have we gone to far? Don't we need a bit of balance? A few more "this is how it could be" stories?

Is that too clever an ask?

 

Until 2008 Philip Patston identified as gay, disabled and vegetarian. These days he prefers to think of himself as having a unique experience. A social entrepreneur and change consultant, with fifteen years’ experience as an award-winning professional comedian, he aims to promote a new, more useful understanding of diversity. He runs Diversity New Zealand in his spare time (www.diversitynz.com).

 

You can keep in touch with Philip Patston via his social media sites:

 

facebook.com/philippatston

 

twitter.com/philippatston

 

Please vote for this blog in the NetGuide Web Awards.

Philip Patston's Entries

Comments [5]

Craig Young
12 Jul 2010 03:01p.m.

Andy Haden's grotesque remarks were the product of particular 'tradition' and spousal rape also used to be a 'tradition' until it was criminalised in 1982. If those are examples of 'traditional' "values" then sorry, to me, they're worthless...

Craig Young
09 Jul 2010 07:10p.m.

We are dealing with Australia, here, don't forget.
Thank goodness we're seperated from it by a very large
moat...

leftwinga
06 Jul 2010 06:00p.m.

Quote: "But have we gone to far? Don't we need a bit of balance? A few more "this is how it could be" stories?"

Maybe what we really need is to go back to higher moral standards. Get a censor in who won't pander to the whinging "you're offending my right to see what I want" brigade. What about the rights of those people who have been murdered, maimed, raped (both sexes), traumatised through home invasions etc.? Oh, of course, they don't matter. Just so long as the local yobbos have their right to watch whatever graphic violence or perversions they want. Time for a radical overhaul of community standards, and don't give me that bollocks that we can't go back. We can, and we should.

Philip
06 Jul 2010 02:05p.m.

Hmmm, maybe Barker was being deliberately racist - I was trying to give him the benefit of doubt.

Bunbajee
06 Jul 2010 11:51a.m.

He wasn't fighting racism, he was promoting it!
Clever is Barkers explaination that it was to highlight racism, a blatant lie, but clever, because there's not many other ways he could have weaseled out of admitting his racism & how he defends it once he realised it was against the law.

Post a comment

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:


3News Video 3News Audio