3News » Home
Full Story

Red Cliff review

4 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA

video
Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:22p.m.

Reviewed by Kate Rodger

Red Cliff is already a record-breaking box office hit in China, and after making the cut at several big film festivals, including the New Zealand International Film Festival, is now getting a wider release here.

This is the most expensive Chinese film ever made and you can see those dollars on screen from the opening credits. This film is epic in both story and delivery, with no shortage of big battles and power struggles.  Chinese director John Woo and his investors will be hoping to see some of that money coming back their way from the international box office, and kiwi audiences may well find plenty to entice them here.

Hollywood welcomed Woo into their big-budget fold in the nineties and he returned the favour with hits Face/Off (I have to confess this as one of my many guilty pleasures) and Mission Impossible 2. Following up with box office flops Windtalkers and Paycheck saw Woo disappear off quietly into the night, and he now returns to the big screen with a story from his homeland.

Set in ancient China in the early third century, Red Cliff is based on the historic battle for Red Cliffs, as powerful warlords fight for land and ultimate domination. This is a massive military campaign fought on land and water, changing the course of Chinese history forever, and a story which certainly makes for a cinematic spectacle. Fans of big battle scenes, while a little drawn-out for my tastes, will be well-served here. Allegiances are formed and broken as strategists pit their brains and their military might against their sworn enemies, culminating in a final epic face-off.

The result for me was a mixed one.

Red Cliff left me a little cold and uncaring despite the large body count and the epic nature of this sweeping story, and clocking in at just under two and a half hours was too long. Not enough attention paid to the individual stories within, and with too much going on, I found it a struggle to form my own allegiances to the characters involved.

Last year's Mongol from Russian director Sergei Bodrov had more heart and substance, and was, in my view, a superior film.  

Hardcore battle-hardened die-hard fans of big war movies may well feel differently about Red Cliff, but for me, it was an unremarkable 3 star watch.

    Red Cliff
:: Director: John Woo
:: Starring: Tony Leung, Takeshi Kaneshiro, Fenghi Zhang
:: Running Time: 149 mins
:: Rating:  M - Battle Violence
:: Release Date: October 15, 2009

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [4]

Sunny
02 Nov 2009 5:58p.m.

I like Joo woo's brilliant action movies very much, especial this new released hot movie, a lot of Chinese traditional culture, history and heroes, this is an anti-war movie, and the best movie production in China and best selling film record in China, over US$200million boxing tickets in asian. Of course, I think western still like to see this fantastic hot film.

Get on to it
19 Oct 2009 3:15a.m.

The actual "Red Cliff" movie is 5 hours long, so to critic this 149min version is like judging a 3hour summery of the Lord of the Rings TRILOGY. Come on Kate.. it does have a story you know and it WILL rock your socks off

Soma
19 Oct 2009 12:58a.m.

Originally there were two movies released in Asia, but for western release they cut it down to one. The originals are a mess anyway. It has an ensemble cast (and at least two Asian superstars in Tony Leung and Takeshi Kaneshiro). Unless you've read the novel they were based on or know the history of that era, you will have a VERY hard time distinguishing one character from another. It is watching Lord of the Rings when you can't tell Aragorn from Eomer. Compared to Zhang Yimou's movies (e.g. Hero, Curse of the Golden Flower), there is not enough visual cue to separate the different characters. The only saving grace for the movie are the battle scenes. They are chaotic, intense and messy, like a Black Hawk Down in 3rd Century China. You actually see where the huge budget was sink into, it is like John Woo waving wads of hundies on screen during those scenes. So IMO 3 stars is a fair assessment.

Sup
17 Oct 2009 8:55p.m.

I can understand where you're coming from, I think it's harder for people who haven't grown up with these characters as pop culture icons will have difficulty relating to them- not to mention a lot of the individual character development was brutally chopped off in the editing room as Woo felt that the original two movie version might not be palatable for western tastes. Honestly, I just think Woo should give westerners more credit and let them see the whole movie, but maybe that's just me.

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio