3News » Home
Full Story

Reporting suicide: Chief Coroner wants rules relaxed

4 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
A total 540 deaths last year were a result of suicide (file)

A total 540 deaths last year were a result of suicide (file)

video
Thu, 12 Aug 2010 6:10p.m.

By Emma Jolliff

The Chief Coroner is calling for an overhaul of the rules surrounding the reporting of suicide.

Journalists are bound by strict guidelines designed to minimise copycat behaviour, but Judge Neil Mclean says more responsible reporting could have the opposite effect and save lives.

Heather Powell describes her son Michael’s suicide as a “bolt out of the blue”.

He was just 15 when he took his own life in 2009, after a late night text conversation about suicide.

“They’re dead, it’s horribly simple, there is no coming back,” Ms Powell says.

“It’s desperately, desperately sad. It’s not heroic. It’s final.”

Is it time for suicide reporting to lose its stigma?

Judge Mclean says New Zealanders need to know the truth about how many people are taking their own lives.

“Generally the responsible media will say, ‘Well hang on, wouldn’t it be better to tell people what is actually happening and might that then not prevent more suicides?’.”

For each of the last three years there have been around 540 deaths described by coroners as “self-inflicted”.

That is 50 percent more than last year’s road toll.

The Coroner’s Act currently restricts the way suicides can be reported.

“The new Act now says the Coroner shall not authorise publication of particular details unless satisfied it will do now harm,” says Judge Mclean.

“It’s really hard to grieve because it’s not really acknowledged,” says Ms Powell.

It is important it isn’t sensationalised, she says. People are warned about the consequences of drink driving but not suicide, because it is not discussed.

Nandor Tanczos tackles the issue of suicide reporting in his latest blog

Media Commentator Jim Tully says the scale of the problem should be reported, but not individual cases – unless they have particular news value.

“It might be the prominence of the individual, it might be that the event took place in a public setting,” he says.

“It might be part of a so-called spate, it might be raising important social issues.”

Judge Mclean says a change to legislation is needed and he will debate the issue further at a freedom and media meeting next month.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [4]

Davyd
13 Aug 2010 5:23p.m.

Ryan not all professionals working in mental health support the suppression of talking about suicide. People in general need to know that feelings of depression and suicidal thoughts are more common than those experiencing them think. This is to help destigmatise these thoughts to make asking for help more acceptable. This leads to the need to improve access to the help. The only thing not needed is media attention that engrandises suicide.

Ryan
13 Aug 2010 1:20a.m.

This is a catch 22 situation. It's the psychologists and mental health professionals and researchers that are the ones mainly requesting this supression - and I assure you it is done with a heavy heart, and not out of any sense of "shame" - as a scientist the suppression of information goes against the grain. In an ideal world we would like suicide to be an openly discussed issue (though in an "ideal world" - it wouldn't be a problem) - and we try to do that under the radar, however it is a simple fact that the more suicide is discussed and reported in the media - the more suicides occur. This includes fictional pop media - if Shortland Street has a story in which someone kills themselves - then we see a spike in suicide rates. While I don't like the supression of information, exactly how does reporting suicide in the media actually help those who are vulnerable? The truth is we can do our best work if suicide is kept out of public media - yet someone let those who are at risk of the various counselling services available (through more indirect advertisments and getting school counsellors and medical professionals to keep an eye out for those vulnerable). Which again is a bit of a catch 22. Another issue is that we require public funding - yet if it's not a public issue the Government often don't care - as there are no votes to be had. However to proponents of law change - I'd ask that you consider carefully why you want suicide reporting to be more prevalent - for those that need the help, those that just want to know, or for those who simply beleive they are entitiled to feel outraged - if little is being done, or less guilty - if plenty is being done. Quite frankly your outrage or guilt, or morbid fascination is (and should be) the least of our concerns.

Sue
12 Aug 2010 7:33p.m.

If what we know from research is that the reporting of suicide leads to and increase in suicide, from copycatting or whatever happens, why would we want to go against the existing rulings? Doesn't make sense!

Jim & Sarah Harper
12 Aug 2010 7:25p.m.

The prevalence of suicide is a very clear performance indicator covering the design and delivery of any nation's mental health services.

In New Zealand these services are the overall specific responsibility of the Ministry of Health. Maybe not surprising then that the Ministry, with media assistance, has fiercely suppressed information and informed public debate about suicides for at least two decades.

We have a cultural compact of silence on this issue.

Suicides, as people "disappear" in New Zealand and their unacknowledged lives feed the derogatory and uninformed comment about :"losers", "cowards"...which they are not.

Suicide was a crime in Colonial New Zealand. Has it been effectively and subtly recriminalised? This keeps family sorrow and shame ever present.

We hope we never see practices such as reported in some US schools where school administrators have Photoshopped or airbushed out images of suicides from school publications and photos. And in particular images of sports heros or apparently otherwise successful young people.

Finally,a quote from Ulysses; James Joyce (p120 Paladin): When Bloom - whose father committed the "great disgrace" - listens to the righteously ignorant discussing the subject and claiming "the man who does it is a coward" he finally says quietly, about anyone who commits suicide...."They used to drive a stake of wood through his heart in the grave. As if it wasn't broken already".

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio

Post your opinion

3News - Was the force used at the Dotcom mansion excessive?
On January 20th, two helicopters and 76 police officers arrived a
Comments (191)