• Full Story

Researchers identify useless diet foods

Print

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 6:33a.m.

Toasted muesli in whole milk? No good

Toasted muesli in whole milk? No good

Otago University obesity researchers have identified a list of 49 foods they say contain lots of energy but are essentially bereft of nutritional benefits.

While the list contains the usual suspects of fatty foods and soft drinks, it also throws up some surprises, such as fruit juice, honey, and even muesli bars which can be more fattening than toffee pops.

The NEEDNT, or non-essential, energy dense, nutritionally deficient, list was published in the New Zealand Medical Journal on Friday, and has been developed primarily to help obese people better identify those foods best avoided.

Lead author Jane Elmslie stressed it was not just another list of high calorie foods, but also showed those low in essential nutrients such as vitamins and minerals.

The list names the generic food, and suggests a healthier replacement, or none at all for foods such as ice cream, cakes, chocolate, doughnuts, jam, pies and pastries.

"Muesli bars are a classic example of how overweight people can be misled into thinking they're eating healthy food," Dr Elmslie said.

"Most muesli bars are high in calories, and fat and sugar, with minimal nutritional value. Essentially they are just another form of biscuit."

She said people were bombarded with food advertising, and many foods that people believed were healthy were described in glowing terms on the label, but it was hoped the list would help them make better choices about what they ate while trying to lose weight.

The NEEDNT, or non-essential, energy dense, nutritionally deficient, list:

1.Alcoholic drinks
2.Biscuits
3.Butter, lard, dripping or similar fat (used as a spread or in baking/cooking etc.)
4.Cakes
5.Chocolate
6.Coconut cream
7.Condensed milk
8.Cordial
9.Corn chips
10.Cream (including creme fraiche)
11.Crisps (including vegetable crisps)
12.Desserts/puddings
13.Doughnuts
14.Drinking Chocolate, Milo etc.
15.Energy drinks
16.Flavoured milk/milkshakes
17.Fruit tinned in syrup
18.Fried food
19.Frozen yoghurt
20.Fruit juice (except tomato juice and unsweetened blackcurrant juice)
21.Glucose
22.High fat crackers
23.Honey
24.Hot chips
25.Ice cream
26.Jam
27.Marmalade
28.Mayonnaise
29.Muesli bars
30 Muffins
31.Nuts roasted in fat or oil
32.Pastries
33.Pies
34.Popcorn with butter or oil
35.Quiches
36.Reduced cream
37.Regular luncheon sausage
38.Regular powdered drinks
39.Regular salami
40.Regular sausages
41.Regular soft drinks
42.Fruit rollups
43.Sour cream
44.Sugar (added to anything including drinks, baking, cooking etc.)
45.Sweets/lollies
46.Syrups such as golden syrup, treacle, maple syrup
47.Toasted muesli and any other breakfast cereal with more than 15g sugar per 100g cereal
48.Whole milk
49.Yoghurt type products with more than 10g sugar per 100g yoghurt

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

03 Mar 2012 09:59a.m.

john c. wrote:

Frankly, you have again gone overboard! Most of these foods in moderation are healthy and beneficial. Why must you always try to alarm people?

29 Feb 2012 05:39a.m.

AVanEss wrote:

is there a reason they have to be listed alphabetically instead of in a useful way?

28 Feb 2012 01:44p.m.

Dee wrote:

I'm not surprised alcohol is non-essential and nutritionally deficient, but who would possibly think otherwise? The same could be said for about half that list. Who eats chocolate cake for it's nutritional value??? The list seems to be trying to do two things at once: list food people may think is beneficial, but actually isn't, as well listing foods that are obviously not beneficial... But perhaps it's partly the article's fault, with "Researchers identify useless diet foods" as the headline. If it was just "useless foods", maybe it would all make more sense...

28 Feb 2012 08:21a.m.

Puck615 wrote:

Quit the complaining! I think that the more we read/watch/listen to evidence-based health-promotion materials in all media, the easier it becomes to adopt better dietary and physical-activity habits into daily life. Slowly, over the years, I have been changing. IN ADDITION, COURT: You point out that "not the whole world is British" and that "Most Americans call (biscuits) cookies." Guess what? Not the whole world is American either! I am e-mailing from Washington, DC. When a New Zealander refers to a "biscuit," I know that of which he or she speaks/writes. Thank you very much.

28 Feb 2012 06:30a.m.

Grant wrote:

This research highlights useless researchers and the power advertising and pseudoscience has over so called academics.
For years I have stood in line at supermarkets watching morbidly obese people with trolley loads of groceries including diet soft drinks, while I had normal coke and a small armful of food. These researchers promote diet drinks where other researchers have found that diet drinks cause people to eat more. As for honey, that is supposedly on the bad list when people say its good. Ever wondered why honey does not have a preservative added? Besides low water activity, perhaps honey has high levels of naturally occuring benzoic acid from pollen that then has a detrimental effect on blood sugar levels as well as contibuting to cancer risk if it converts to benzene in the presence of some organic acids(http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/handle/10289/2665). Yum, pass me the bee puke!

28 Feb 2012 04:20a.m.

greg wrote:

Useless article...

28 Feb 2012 03:47a.m.

Kiwi1 wrote:

With respect, this article seems very incomplete. I would not regard most of these as primary components of a balanced diet, although sausages, milk and fruit juice might meet that criterion for some. If one supplements an average healthy balance of vegetables, protein and fresh fruits with moderate amounts of some items on this list, you'll be OK.

I would very much like to see the "experts'" list of wholesome, worthwhile foods they feel we should exist on. If quiche (eggs, vegetables/cheese, low-fat milk) is worthless as a food substance, a couple of my diabetes-suffering friends should have starved to death some years ago!

26 Feb 2012 06:46a.m.

Court wrote:

I was not at all surprised to see alcohol as #1, but I, too, was surprised to see some other things on the list. And not the whole world is British, so we don't all know what you mean by some of the terms used, like "biscuits": scones? Most Americans call them cookies.

25 Feb 2012 12:12p.m.

Wastrel wrote:

I'll take one of each.

25 Feb 2012 10:06a.m.

wombat wrote:

This is a useless article. This is merely a list of foods that are high in calories. How can "yogurt" be good nutritionally, but yogurt with more than 10g of sugar per 100g is not? Fruit is nutitionally sound, but if you add sugar and put it in a tin can, then it is not? Does the nutrition disappear?

Was this written by a fat person blaming the food? I could have written this list on my lunch break. No need for "university researchers" at all. I wonder how much grant money was wasted on this?

Add this piece to the long list of pseudo-scientific articles with no educational value. Empty calories for the mind.