Resolution hope dwindling at IWC meeting

Print

Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:47p.m.

The pro-whaling nations say unless other countries meet them in the middle, there’ll be no deal (Reuters)

The pro-whaling nations say unless other countries meet them in the middle, there’ll be no deal (Reuters)

By Kim Choe

Talks that could result in an end to the moratorium on commercial whaling are at an impasse, with both sides of the debate waiting for the other to compromise.

It is looking increasingly likely the latest meeting of the International Whaling Commission will fail to reach a deal – which may spell the group’s end.

The IWC meeting is only in its second day, but after tough talks with Japan, New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Murray McCully has already as good as ruled out any chance of success.

“I think there is a very high possibility, always has been a high possibility, that there will be no agreement brokered here,” says Mr McCully.

“Parties are a long way apart. We have seen some positive moves, but on the scale of the differences that exist, just nowhere near enough.”

But the pro-whaling nations say unless other countries meet them in the middle, there’ll be no deal.

“The main stumbling block is that those who are against whaling seem to be willing to accept nothing but nil, and we cannot accept that. A compromise is a compromise. It cannot be nil,” says Norwegian IWC Commissioner Karsten Klepsvik.

Japan says it has already made significant confessions, including a reduction in the quota for the Southern Ocean, suspending its rights to issue new scientific projects.

These aren’t enough for Australia either, with their Environment Protection Minister accusing Japan, Norway and Iceland of holding proceedings to ransom.

“Effectively three pro-whaling nations are putting a proposal which they support in effect, which numbers of other nations don’t,” says Australian Environment Minister Peter Garrett.

For a while it looked like an agreement by default might be reached, with 17 mostly pro-whaling nations losing their voting rights for reasons including failing to pay their annual fees.

But Mr McCully says it won’t affect the outcome.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

23 Jun 2010 11:12p.m.

Leonard Green wrote:

@s Nice sentiment, and just what the whaling nations are saying. Compromise means both sides give up something. It does not mean, as the anti-whalers seem to think, that one side dictates to the other.

And good for you on that boycott. You do know that everybodies favorite anti-whalers, the Sea Shepherds, DON'T boycott Japan? In fact they are whining because a Japanese electronics company won't sell them the parts they want. So all you anti-whaling sheep, keep up those oh so effective boycotts while your leaders who encourage you to boycott, go behind your back and ignore the boycott.

Typical cult like behavior. The leader says do as I say not as I do.

23 Jun 2010 06:27p.m.

s wrote:

japan and th eother 2 countries are stupid cant they see that noone in the world wants to kill these majestic creatures!!! comon japs compromise by stopping all together or the world will just have to treat u that little bit worse i say ban all japs and norwegians and icelanders from whale watching tours and while ure at it entering our country im already boycotting all jap owned products i will continue unitl somthing changes. comon dickheads give up!!!

23 Jun 2010 01:11p.m.

V wrote:

Japan withdraws from IWC and continues to Whale everyone else wails, boo hoo whatya gonna do. NOTHING.