SAS death could change NZ’s role in Kabul

Print

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:29p.m.

PM John Key and Defence chief Lieutenant General Rhys Jones

PM John Key and Defence chief Lieutenant General Rhys Jones

By Elizabeth Puranam

The Government says the SAS soldier killed today in Afghanistan was shot while assisting Afghan police trying to prevent an attack on Kabul.

While the Prime Minister says the tragedy won’t change his decision to recommit troops to Afghanistan, an expert believes it could lead to a shift in their role.

It is the second time in as many months the Government has announced the death of an SAS soldier. Defence won’t name him until tomorrow, to give his family enough time to inform extended family.

But they say he died while assisting elite Afghan police carrying out an arrest in Wardak province, not far from Kabul, in an area mostly under Taliban control.

“The people in that compound opened fire with rifle fire and there were also some explosions,” Defence Force Chief Lieutenant Rhys Jones said.

The SAS soldier was shot in the head with a rifle.

His death brings the total number of soldiers killed while serving with the New Zealand forces in Afghanistan to four.

But the Prime Minister is standing by his decision to redeploy the SAS till next March.

“I think it’s been the toughest decision I’ve made, but I continue to believe it was the right decision,” John Key says.

Insurgency attacks typically increase in the summer months and one foreign affairs specialist says pulling out of Afghanistan now won’t be an option for the Government.

“Let’s put this into perspective,” says Auckland Uni Foreign Affairs Analyst Stephen Hoadley. “The Australians have lost 28 soldiers, the United States well over 1000 – so if New Zealand decided to leave now because of the increased danger, it wouldn’t look good that New Zealand really wasn’t bearing its fair share of the burden.”

But Mr Hoadley says he wouldn’t be surprised if the SAS changed its role.

“It’s quite possible that new instructions will be given from Wellington to Kabul to indicate that the SAS should be training and mentoring and not getting in harms way.”

The Defence Force will reveal more information about today’s attack, as well as the soldier’s name, at 2pm tomorrow.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

03 Oct 2011 12:32a.m.

Thomas wrote:

I wonder is there is too much publicity about the death of our soldiers while on duty. The facts are that this latest death if of someone who willingly joined the armey knowing full well what the consequences could be, & that they could end up serving in any of the world's most volatile combat zones, which in this case is most definitely was, I guess I'm also partly inspired to write this after having lost my wife to cancer, someone that had no intention of wanting to die.

30 Sep 2011 12:45p.m.

Hamish wrote:

If they win they have to go home, it was a conflict designed to dominate but drag on so a military presence is necessary. 150,000 guns against 20 million Afghans? not designed to win fast. Afghanistan is strategicly located in the most oil-rich region in the world. Invasion plans for the middle east were drawn up as early as the 1970's.

29 Sep 2011 03:08p.m.

ridley wrote:

Its a war that will never be won or resolved by the west.Its intertwined with religion going back to the wars of the crusades. This country and America would do well to pull out completely and let them sort it out amongst themselves no matter what the outcome is.Also the billions of dollars spent by the western country's on this war is sending them broke and into world recession.

29 Sep 2011 02:22p.m.

Mark wrote:

Anybody who sends mercenaries to Afghanistan is guilty of terrorism and should be tried in international criminal courts for crimes against humanity.. including New Zealand's terrorist Prime Minister.

29 Sep 2011 02:09a.m.

sas wrote:

Yes lets put this into prospective Steven Hoadley. What burrdin???We we asked to go there under the the assumtion It was for us to help the world defend against terror!Now 10 years since it started we all know the full truth about 911 and we also know that the UN force lead by America went to Afganastan to continue the flow of Opium,So yes lets keep it in prospective!The war plans were drawn up before 911 and the biggest contract to come from Afganistan is for the worlds forces to protect the pharmacudical industies,For its biggest demand is.....WAIT for it,,,yip you guessed it opium! My heart gose out to the familys of the soilders and my heart also gose out to the Afgahni people.