SCF could end up under foreign ownership - govt

Print

Wed, 01 Sep 2010 6:20p.m.

John Key said the Government wanted to sell South Canterbury, and buyers were making themselves known

John Key said the Government wanted to sell South Canterbury, and buyers were making themselves known

By Jeff Hampton

South Canterbury Finance could end up under foreign ownership with the Government indicating it is keen to sell the company it had to bail out for a record $1.7 billion.

The company went into receivership yesterday but still has assets worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

John Key said the Government wanted to sell South Canterbury, and buyers were making themselves known.

“There's no question there's interest it's just a question of what price and whether it satisfies the Government's tests,” he says.

Mr Key also put the blame for the failure fair and square on Allan Hubbard.

“Allan Hubbard was the person who ran a company that lent money to people who couldn't repay it and on that basis it went bankrupt.”

South Canterbury lost a lot in the Auckland property market; in retrospect a 2008 road trip involving Mr Hubbard and former chief executive Lachie McLeod highlights the company going off track.

Questions are also being asked about whether investors should have been told more about the company's growing problems in the last nine months.

“There could have been a loss of several hundred million dollars in value in the company without any disclosure to the investors,” says stockbroker Chris Lee.

Mr Hubbard supporters are also unhappy that Finance Minister Bill English isn't giving more detail about the rejected private bids for South Canterbury, including one Mr Hubbard put together.

“I think he's got an obligation to the taxpayer to come clean about what was on the table, why was it scuttled and who scuttled it,” says a supporter of Mr Hubbard, Paul Carruthers.

Today, Allan Hubbard requested privacy saying he still felt under siege and had done so ever since he and his wife were put in statutory management, but he says he's planning to say more in the future.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

04 Sep 2010 05:04p.m.

Piere wrote:

Exactly, Williamson has hit it right on the head. The proof is they (reactionists red necks) oppose selling to Asians but turned a blind eye on ASB buying up grandparents' properties??? Isn't ASB and BNZ owned by foreign nationals?

04 Sep 2010 09:59a.m.

Petra wrote:

The government will throw a billion or so at a failed "finance" company so why don't they buy the Crafar farms as well. Look at the deal all the capitalists say is there and tell me why not. The farms were put in receivership last year owing over $200 million. Bill Ralston, who is acting as a spokesman for Natural Dairy, says benefits of the sale are too good to be ignored. He said the sale of the farms would add upwards of $200 million a year in increased export earnings, create 120 jobs, and pump $5 million into getting young sharemilkers onto farms. There we are, the farms cost around $200 million, but as Bill says you could make back $200 million in a year plus creating 120 jobs and having $5 million to get young farmers into business sharemilking. So isn't spending around $200 million and getting it back in a year or two plus creating 120 jobs and getting young New Zealand farmers a leg up better than throwing a billion dollars into a hole?