Sack Smith now Mr Key - opinion

Print

Wed, 21 Mar 2012 9:12a.m.

Former ACC Minister Nick Smith (file pic)

Former ACC Minister Nick Smith (file pic)

By Political Editor Duncan Garner

Nick Smith has shown woeful judgement. And John Key - if he truly believes in accountability and high ethical standards - should sack him immediately.

Smith is lucky to still be a Minister but this saga isn't over yet. If he was ACC Minister still - he'd be gone.

He should never have written a reference letter for his friend Bronwyn Pullar - who was battling ACC while he was ACC Minister - on a ministerial letterhead.

It's poor judgement. He had a conflict of interest. He's broken the rules of the Cabinet manual. He should have known better.

Key must act.

If it was a Labour Party Minister who had done the same thing - Smith would be yelling for his or her resignation day in day out until he had his scalp. So would Key. They did so when former Minister David Benson-Pope showed woeful judgement and was forced to resign.

What's different now? Nothing.

Smith knows what he should be doing here - but he's clinging on.

Winston Peters alleged yesterday that there's more to this, hinting that the relationship with Bronwyn Pullar may go deeper than just knowing each other through the National Party.

Smith said "his private life is his private life". What does that mean? Was he in a relationship at some stage with her?

If he was then that surely makes this worse.

So this morning John Key should haul Smith into his office and ask him the following;

What was the nature of his relationship with Pullar?

Was it more than a friendship?

If the answer is yes - Smith must go on the spot.

If the answer is no, he must still go. Ministers should NEVER use their position to go into bat for their friends.

It is the first rule of being a Minister.

Smith knows the rules. He's been here for 20 years. He's not a junior Minister. We rarely use the word corruption in NZ. But in my opinion it's a corrupt practice to use your Ministerial powers and warrant to advance the interests of a friend.

That is what happened here - and Smith has no wriggle room.

Key should follow through on his promises from 2008. He promised higher ethical standards for Ministers. Now his position that "so much has changed in the economy since 2008" is no excuse to get out of this promise, surely.

Smith must go. His judgement does not meet the standard required to be a Minister. This will rumble on and Smith -and Key's Government - will stink more by the day if he's left to rot as a Minister.

Key should sack him. His second term Government has faced enough pressure already in 2012 without this messy scandal rolling on. Draw a line under Smith. Sack him. Promote a new face and get on with it Prime Minister.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

4/04/2012 2:52:38 p.m.

amy wrote:

Corruption comes to mind.

National seem to have a history of major screw ups...far worse than any other party.

2/04/2012 6:24:06 a.m.

Kev wrote:

2 lines of thought here...one is, when there is a problem ("MP's"),don't assist,& the other is,when there is a problem they don't assist,so how useless is that.Bennett's turn next......paying invalids $5.00 per week for power is a wee bit silly

22/03/2012 8:10:18 a.m.

Phil wrote:

Nick has been skating on thin ice for a long time.

21/03/2012 3:06:40 p.m.

Siena wrote:

No sooner had I finished typing my comment and in my gmail is about 4 articles Headlining, "Smith Announces Resignation In Parliament." However, "Smith said he did not intend resigning from Parliament and would serve out his term as an MP." He cannot give up those MP trappings eh!

21/03/2012 2:43:15 p.m.

Siena wrote:

Kiaora Duncan.
I agree with your opinion on Nick Smith. He put himself in that position and in doing so crossed that invisible line. It is quite apparent with the Letter he sent in support of his 'Lady Friend', that he has brought into question his own propriety and public duty but more importantly to the government that he serves and represents and to the New Zealand Public to whom he also serves. A man of his political experience should know better and he must be dealt with accordingly and I believe it is "necessary to consider a permanent change to some or all of this Minister's portfolio responsibilities."

@anne said..."and the other national
party female insider really are to be thanked for the
situation comming to the notice of the public.

I am just guessing anne is referring to Michelle Boag. I read a book called the Paradise Conspiracy (Winebox Inquiry) a few weeks ago and what was said of this woman, and now her involvement in this ACC case I am surprised that she has not done a stint in a correctional facility.


Hei kona ra Duncan me koe anne

21/03/2012 1:39:22 p.m.

Peter wrote:

If they sack Nick then they may as well sack the whole parliament. Great smoke screen though, as ACC have deflected the grave issue of client confidentiality and criminal tampering of expert opinion, off themselves - this Corporation is so fat from Public funds it fails to distribute to covered claimants, that it is able to employ the best spin Dr's in the business. Looking at Dr Smiths predicament they did a good job in a messy and potentially very damaging situation. Put the spot light back on the appropriate body - ACC; Nick Smith is just being used as an ACC scapegoat. The whole area of Sensitive Claims and ACC claimant abuse needs an independent, high level, Public inquiry regarding systemic and covert tampering of legal client Assessments as noted in the original Greens Party Press Release. Please Journo's get back on topic this is a chance to make ACC accountable for it's abusive and illegal disregard of vulnerable and powerless sensitive unit claimants. Don't drop the ball now by concentrating on the easy and obvious story.

21/03/2012 1:18:28 p.m.

Neil wrote:

Opinion piece - what part of this don't you folk get - it's when a reporter can legitimately give his own view on something or some event. So ipso facto he doesn't need to be objective at all. It's like most of the Blogs that proliferate the internet these days - you don't have to agree with them and they don't have to care if you don't - it's their opinion...On the matter viewed - Smith should go from Cabinet.

21/03/2012 12:52:55 p.m.

duncan garner wrote:

To all those who say I have should no opinion - this is an opinion piece.

It's what I'm paid to do as Political Editor.

Report facts, report live with facts, report live with facts and opinion, write op-ed peices, write opinion pieces, go on radio, talk about he facts, form judgements based on facts - based on inside knowledge. Like a plumber fixes toilets, like an electrician fixes lights - this is my job - nothing more - nothing less.

To those who want to take it up further email me dgarner@tv3.co.nz - and I'm happy to debate it privately.

Cheers
Duncan

21/03/2012 12:27:14 p.m.

Alpha wrote:

Did the above commenters miss the part of the headline that reads "opinion"?

21/03/2012 12:22:31 p.m.

Shamon wrote:

he should be sacked, really should be , how embarrasing for the Nats. It shows his contempt for Nzers and reminds me of Bill English parking on a para/handicap parking space so he could fit int his Haircut one day and blatently breaking the law ( no matter how small ) for selfish reasons and laughed about it and Nothing happened about it and he never made good on it , him or his driver. Another example of contempt for ordinary Nzers by people who we elected ( with Our consent ) to represent us and govern our country.