• Full Story

Safety overhaul will ‘end’ many tourism businesses

Print

Mon, 30 May 2011 3:21p.m.

The NZ Professional Fishing Guides Association says it is unfair that the review penalizes "passive" activities (Reuters)

The NZ Professional Fishing Guides Association says it is unfair that the review penalizes "passive" activities (Reuters)

By 3news.co.nz staff

There are fears the Government’s new tourism safety initiatives will force many smaller operators to close due to a spike in safety costs.

The New Zealand Professional Fishing Guides Association, one of the country’s largest organisations for outdoor adventure tourism, says the initiative will add $2000 or more to each member of the sector.

“The Prime Minister’s Initiative Review of Safety in the Tourism sector will see the end of many small tourism operators, or drive them underground,” says Mr Frank Murphy, national president of the NZPFGA.

Mr Murphy says many smaller operators who run less dangerous activities such as fly-fishing, horse trekking, and 4x4 bike tours are being unfairly hit with cost increases.

“It is ironic that the activity that prompted this safety review has not been caught up in these regulations as it was already regulated.

“Anyone casting a dry fly on a gentle river in the evening could not be compared with someone prepared to jump into a raging river with a nothing but a board and a prayer.”

Mr Murphy says there has also been minimal consultation between members and the Government.

“Most members had not been involved in any consultation and most were only just hearing about this new cost of business being forced upon them in October.”

Mr Murphy says the NZPFGA plans to join with other passive recreational activities to oppose the ban.

The national review follows the death of English tourist Emily Jordan in April 2008. Ms Jordan was river boarding in Queenstown through adventure operator Mad Dog when she became pinned under the water and drowned.

The company pleaded guilty to charges concerning their health and safety practises and was fined $66,000, and ordered to pay the Jordan family $80,000 in reparations.

Ms Jordan’s father Chris Jordan lobbied for the Government to overhaul the adventure tourism safety standards after his daughter’s death.  

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

04 Jun 2011 09:51a.m.

Brian wrote:

hey Ian, the maritime safety officer who inspected and passed my boat and equipment said if I took the engine off none of this would apply - you and I know not having the back-up of an engine isn't safe. I've never been towed but have assisted others. This is clearly revenue gathering with nothing to do with safety.

03 Jun 2011 03:06p.m.

Ian wrote:

I also am a fishing guide and from October the raft I use to fish lake margins will illegal,while fishing to sighted fish I use oar's all the time.For the sake of safety I have recently installed a four horse motor so if the wind comes up and I'm downwind the matter of getting back up the lake to the launching ramp doesn't become an issue when the only legal form of propelling the craft is oar's. In the last few years we have been towed home three times as the north west wind has made it impossible to get home. Come on guys a raft with four horses of power and a max of four knots needs a skippers certificate or similar, I don't think so, how about looking at this legislation again and put some commonsense into it!!

03 Jun 2011 11:59a.m.

Brian wrote:

I am a fishing guide. After October it will be I WAS a fishing guide. Maritime Safety intends to impose a safety plan on fishing guides more suitable for coastal shipping skippers - at a cost of course. I launch my 12ft dinghy with 15hp motor, motor to the fishing spot, row all day while my client fishes,then motor back to the boat ramp - this less than a dozen times a season as we mostly fish rivers. For that I will at present require a minimum qualification of local launch operator,also abide by the maritime transport act, maritime rules and regulations, navigation safety bylaw, maritime pollution regulation, health and safety employment act, and don't forget the DOC concession and guiding licences soon to be imposed. Clients are complaining NZ is too expensive to visit - regulars for over a decade no longer coming. Not only is guiding unaffordable this crap is taking the enjoyment out of it. I love the job but am over battling bureaucrats especially when not one has even taken up my invitation to come out with me to see firsthand what is involved.

30 May 2011 10:44p.m.

whippy wrote:

Finally an organisation prepared to take Mr Key to task. Did National not platform at the last election to decrease bureaucracy for small business. This is his initiative and all it does is increase compliance costs. Funny thing is the River boarding industry which brought all this about is exempt from this review as they are covered by other legislation.

30 May 2011 10:07p.m.

Alan wrote:

I currently live and work in Australia. The paranoia over here about keeping people safe has gone overboard so much that certain businesses have decided it is too hard to work within the rules and called it a day.
For example it can be hard to find businesses offering horse riding here anymore. Certain sports have just died. Don't go down Australia's path. This is a country where no one takes responsibility for anything. Swimming pools, parks even Bondi beach was at one point threatened with closure by the Waverly Council. Just educate people of the risks and then leave it up to them to make a decision on whether to participate or not. Australia is such a nanny state, please NZ don't become another nanny state! The one thing I was always proud of was that NZ had more commonsense than here when it came to these sorts of things.

30 May 2011 04:42p.m.

Fred wrote:

If it is Government, putting together a new law, you can guarantee they will stuff it up. It is always, 'plan for how much money we can make' and never 'let's use commonsense here'.

30 May 2011 04:26p.m.

Chris Rigby wrote:

Imagine that! Businesses being made to behave in a safe manner. What ever will these woolly minded liberal politicians come up with next?

30 May 2011 04:20p.m.

jj wrote:

Smells very fishy with Key on this one.