• Full Story

Sallies call for 25 percent alcohol tax increase

Print

Sun, 15 Nov 2009 1:48p.m.

Two teenagers drink in the street (file pic)

Two teenagers drink in the street (file pic)

The Government should increase tax on alcohol by 25 percent and use the money to help counter damage caused by alcohol abuse, the Salvation Army says.

The tax increase could reduce drinking by teenagers and heavy drinkers by 10 percent, but would have little effect on moderate drinkers, its social policy and parliamentary unit director Major Campbell Roberts said in a report released today.

"Changes in this order would markedly reduce the misery and the social and fiscal costs associated with dangerous drinking without penalising responsible drinkers."

The increase would raise the cost of a handle of beer at a bar by 20 percent and a bottle of wine from an off-licence by 50 cents.

A six pack of bourbon and cola and a cask of wine would go up by $2.

The Salvation Army also recommended drinks be taxed solely on their alcohol content, with drinks containing less than 2.5 percent alcohol exempt of local taxes, Mr Roberts said.

Under the current system low alcohol drinks often cost more than mid or high strength drinks.

The additional revenue, which could be as much as $180 million, could be used to reduce harmful drinking by investing in programmes such as social marketing campaigns to educate people on alcohol-related risks, he said.

The Salvation Army was seeing an increase in families who said alcohol abuse and addiction was a leading cause of poverty and family violence in their lives, Mr Roberts said.

In the year to September admissions to its rehabilitation programmes for substance addiction had grown by 21 percent.

NZPA

 

 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

17 Nov 2009 11:35a.m.

tallica1 wrote:

25% increase will be a pain but a whole $2 extra is not going to stop the binge drinking.

16 Nov 2009 12:26p.m.

ACCSUX wrote:

Here it is in simple plain English. there not going to stop drinking. untill we hav a change in the social policy . in NZ . Jobs , not slavery .for all, wages not poverty. and we need proper accountability and baning from drinking for those whom cant behave.. not punish us all. We hav parents that no longer hav a back bone ,, and want the government to ban everything. So they dont hav to do the job anymore. Put up the price of alcohol.. and instead of one or two burglary's we get now .per bottle... ya going to get a whole lot more , burgs., more crime more voilence,, more drunks takeing more $$$$from the family budgit to pay for the piss. We will see bootleg alcohol.. turning up on the street .. poisend people. like in Russia etc , and another money making drug the gangs can use to make money out of. we hav been there b 4 .. prohibition caused ,, much crime.. the rest of us are going to pay far worse if we keep following this already failed crap from ovr seas.. time for drinking licenses ,, and accountability. for the guilty Something that is sadly lacking in NZ but as i have said and posted b 4 .. as long as we have . Politicians paid like gods. that behave like emperors, they wont be held accountable for there crimes. , hell they just change the law to make theres go away. drunks.. and businessman. paid like gods. running this country.. instead of the average citizen..oh and only paid the average wage.. this nasty crap will carry on.

16 Nov 2009 10:29a.m.

Ando wrote:

So you two can't afford to pay a couple of extra bucks for a six-pack and in so doing be part of the solution to a pervasive and increasing social and economic problem? A problem which affects a large segment of the population in a debilitating and devastating way? For shame...

15 Nov 2009 06:15p.m.

Jo wrote:

Why should the rest of us pay for the ones that go overboard! Just another tax on our already taxed income, what next!

15 Nov 2009 01:59p.m.

Alex wrote:

"Changes in this order would markedly reduce the misery and the social and fiscal costs associated with dangerous drinking without penalising responsible drinkers." - are you kidding me? Of course it penalises responsible drinkers if they have to pay 25% more. It is a massive increase.