School causes uproar by doubling fees

Print

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:00a.m.

School starts next week, and for many parents it will be an expensive week with uniforms, text books and fees.

Marlborough Boys' College however is asking parents for nearly twice as much money as it did last year, and parents are not happy.

Evelyne McLean, mother of 13-year-old student Ryan McLean, blames the increases on the school's financial incompetence.

"It's not fair," she says. "Education is suppose to be free, for one thing. To go and lumber us with extra fees is definitely not our responsibility," she says.

In December last year Ms McLean got a letter saying fees at Marlborough Boys' College would be up from $110 to $200, and that any extra sports and cultural activities would have to be paid for by parents.

She is blaming the price hike on poor financial management by the school's principal and board of trustees. The school has a debt of $1.7 million, and schools with debt have only three options - get more money from the ministry, their community, or their parents. 

Marlborough Boys' College has asked the ministry for a loan, but they are stinging the parents to repay it. And what hurts those parents even more is that some of the money was lost in a venture overseas.

"Part of the reason why the school is in so much debt is because of the failure of a school it started up in China which would allow students to gain New Zealand qualifications. But after only its first year running enrolments dropped off significantly, and now some parents are saying that it is them that are having to pay for some bad financial decision making.

"Not many other parents who have boys at Marlborough Boys' College at the moment had any idea that they were investing in China," says Ms McLean. "I think it was something that the community needed to know."

"It is unusual," says Jim Greening of the Ministry of Education. "The ministry is aware of other schools around the country that do enter into business ventures, but what we would do is to encourage all schools to discuss this with us when it's outside the general boundary of where they are operating."

The school defends its financial management. The board says the blow out was caused by it having too many teachers.

"The biggest thing that we can put our finger on is overstaffing," says Phil Robinson, Board of Trustees member. "The school has been carrying six staff above entitlement."

Six jobs have now been cut.

Then there is the decision the school made to buy a $250,000 computer network, believing the Ministry of Education would pay for it.

The ministry says the school failed to follow correct funding rules.

"When they're making major purchases such as this, or entertaining things such as this that fit outside the general nature of their operational grant...they should talk with the ministry," says Mr Greening.

The ministry has appointed a limited statutory manager to help get the school's finances back in shape.

"We've now got a budget with a small surplus, and that surplus will be going to repay the loan from the ministry," says Mr Robinson.

For Ms McLean and other parents Campbell Live spoke to, that is not good enough. She believes this has been a major financial blunder, and the school principal, John Rogers, should resign.

"I think the principal needs to consider relinquishing his position," she says.

Mr Rogers is not speaking publicly. It is the board that is answering the critics, and it is not about to sack anyone.

"The board are working through the issues, what went wrong," says Mr Robinson, "and then once we know what the facts are and if there's fault lying anywhere then it can be dealt with at that stage. But until we have that, the board won't be asking for a resignation or anything like that, 'cause I don't know if that was all the cause or any of the cause."

Ms McLean says the school and the board have failed to keep parents informed about the situation, and she hopes no more financial surprises lie ahead.

"John Rogers could come forward and let us know what is actually happening and what's he going to do about it," she says. "We haven't heard anything from him. We want to be reassured that the finance has been sorted and it's not going to be costing us the earth to have our children at Marlborough Boys' College."

And critics say schools should not be exposing themselves to business risks if it is the parents who have to pick up the tab.

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

23 Feb 2009 08:22p.m.

andrew mccarthy wrote:

I agree with Elaine Jordan, schools are for education not making money on dubious buisiness ventures. By the way I am a teacher if I wanted to be in buisiness I would go into buisness [and probably go broke]

30 Jan 2009 11:27a.m.

Martin wrote:

Its not just fees that are going up but also cut backs within the education system which is really getting to me. My son has to have a teacher aid full time as he is not able to be left alone because of his disablities. Up until this year the teacher aid hrs were 19hrs a week, but without any warning or any notiafication to the school or his teacher aid the hrs were cut to 14 and a half. Now granted that last year he was sick and only used a certain amount of his hrs so do understand the need for a cut back but how many other children are been told by the education board that they are not allowed to be at school because sorry there is no money. To me this is unacceptable and I am sure it is against the law as well. No child should be denied an education because they have an illness or a disability.

29 Jan 2009 07:54p.m.

Lisa wrote:

I feel for parents out there, Books, uniforms, school fees and school activities (camps etc). I remember high school, the one person that didn't go on school camp because parents couldn't afford the extra cost was a social leper for the rest of the school year. I can't imagine how hard it must be for parents who have more than one child at school.
But what bothers me the most is our schools and our health system are under funded, I can't remember a time when they weren't, yet in tonights news it was reported how much money was spent in the Solomon Islands each year to help people there. It was something like $37 Million and it is set to rise to build new houses for the police. How much good could that do for our education system or health system. And that is only the money sent to one county. What is the total annual aid bill to help nations outside of NZ?? I am all for helping those in need but shouldn't our tax payers and people come first? Especially with financial times getting tougher?? If parents can't afford the cost of schooling their children how can they encourage them to stay in school and complete their education? I hope John Key can see that our people need financial aid first, educating our children will ensure a healthy future for our country.

29 Jan 2009 06:30p.m.

Alien wrote:

you must of forgotten how underfunded schools were under labour Guy. The underfunding of schools, health, police, etc has been going on for a number of governments.

29 Jan 2009 01:43p.m.

Guy Smiley wrote:

Richard: I don't think you know what the term "PC" actually means. How is asking for a donation PC? Answer: it isn't, it's just that schools are underfunded because whatever percentage of the country that voted for National/ACT would rather have tax cuts.

29 Jan 2009 01:30p.m.

Richard wrote:

Maybe we could take the money wasted on Gangs and other miscreants and give it to schools so that those who wish to be useful members of society can benefit.

29 Jan 2009 01:27p.m.

Richard wrote:

It is high time school fees were either compulsory, or removed. This PC BS about them being a 'donation' is a crock.

Why should some people scrimp to pay them while others don't?

29 Jan 2009 12:47p.m.

Letitia Smith wrote:

thanks for that Alien I will do just that
but then there is still all these other class fees or electives etc and I dread the books
on a postive note I do only need to buy 2 pair sox and a pe top.
guess it makes it a bit harder with my son being special needs child. I held him back last yr but unable to do that it again.
hope the school has some kind of payment option for these class fees.

29 Jan 2009 12:41p.m.

dan wrote:

Yes , the fee is a voluntary donation which cannot be enforced onto parents . Usually schools adopt the tactics of psychological appraoch by informing parents that the faculty and facilities would get affected if the funds are not available. To a certain extent yes they do need funding assistance but why must it be at the expense of parents . There are enough tax dollars around which should be utilized for this purpose . If the Ministry of Education is not able to manage the show then they too n eed to be sacked and appoint regional committee's through local governance employing financial experts and let them manage the finances of the schools and their requirements . But then Elaine has rightly pointed out we have provided way too much autonomy . BOT is a failure system and should be done away with. Principals should report to local governance and let them sort out the issues .

29 Jan 2009 10:16a.m.

Alien wrote:

Letitia, a school fee is a donation that you legally do not have to pay. They can threaten to not let your son participate in certain things, but by law they can do this, so if you cannot afford to pay this fee then don't, if they threaten you contact the education ministry.