• Full Story

Schools being "bullied" into national standards - Labour

Print

Thu, 08 Sep 2011 2:00p.m.

Labour's education spokesperson Sue Moroney says schools are being bullied into accepting national standards

Labour's education spokesperson Sue Moroney says schools are being bullied into accepting national standards

By Frances Cook

Bullying tactics that force schools to accept the national standards scheme need to stop, the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) and the Labour Party say.

National standards aim to enforce benchmarks on reading, writing and arithmetic, but there has been staunch opposition from schools who believe the scheme will negatively impact classroom learning.

NZEI President Ian Leckie says schools have been bullied into compliance, but remain defiant.

“Forcing schools to be minimally compliant does not mean opposition to national standards has been stymied,” Mr Leckie says.

“Just because a school has been ordered to put a statement in its charter does not mean it will be implementing national standards or measuring children against them.

“Schools are complying because they don’t want statutory managers put in place, but that can in no way be seen as an endorsement of what is untried and a fundamentally flawed educational policy. 

“The crisis of confidence in national standards remains," he says.

Labour education spokesperson Sue Moroney says Labour opposes the national standards system because it is a “one size fits all” approach to education “that is bad for both students and teachers”.

“Schools that believe there is no educational merit in the standards have been threatened and bullied by a Minister who has failed to convince teachers of the merits of the system,” Ms Moroney says.

She says the best education happens when teachers are passionate about their work, which won’t happen with forced compliance.

“I think she should have listened to the sector early on and listened to the advice of the expert panel to at least trial [the standards] first.”

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

12 Sep 2011 09:23a.m.

cherie wrote:

NCEA was brought in by Labour. It is a joke. You get credits for running around a field, packing a bag and baking muffins. Teachers have always been able to dodge being made accountable for thier skills or lack thereof. That is why you get the people in the profession that you do. Nice and comfortable earnings for bugger all effort on the part of many not all but many. You even hear some say how they dont enjoy teaching anymore. Time to get another profession then eh!!

08 Sep 2011 06:46p.m.

cyril wrote:

Teachers and schools dont like it because it means thay will be accountable for the level of education that there pupils get.
NCEA is rubbish. It is hard to see how your kids are doing and there is no consistancy in credits and is difficult for parents and employers to see what level and type of skills children have. I know from puzzling over my boys results for the last three years.

08 Sep 2011 05:42p.m.

Brent wrote:

And there Goes the Boys at the standard again, Come On Clarke, you need to turn over that piece of cardboard and write something else down, Your repeat rave is crap and makes good Labour supporters look Bad. Now I'm of to the Pub to drink with my Maori and Benefit mates, And yes Clarke I do have Mates, That why you don't see me Posting Repeat comments on TV3 websites all the time.

08 Sep 2011 05:11p.m.

katrina wrote:

Something had to be done, the education system was failing some kids. Now at least parents can be given an accurate guide as to how their kids are doing. As a parent I find the charts easy to understand. Much easier than the previous reporting system which was so non specific it was not helpful.
Clarke I object to you constantly calling everyone else a Maori hating, beneficiary bashing red neck. I don't know how you draw that conclusion from Wilbur and Erms comments, neither mention Maoris or beneficiaries or the fact their necks are red. You are the overly judgemental one here.

08 Sep 2011 04:39p.m.

Melanie wrote:

Wilbur... NCEA was initiated by the National Government of the nineties. Labour was merely the government in place at the time of implementation. And yes, that implementation was flawed - shouldn't that have been a learning tool by the current government in their implementation of the very flawed National Standards? Hmmm... well, I think Anne Tolley failed that standard, didn't she?

08 Sep 2011 04:15p.m.

Wiseacre wrote:

If National Standards are such a good idea, why don't private schools have to implement them? Private schools are now heavily subsidised by the taxpayer so why should they be exempt? Is it because the financial & political elite overwhelmingly send their children and grand-children to private schools and as such don't want their own kids subjected to it? Is it because the wealthy elite sending their children to private schools want their kids to receive an actual well-rounded education rather than merely training in reading and arithmetic? National Standards are another step towards the neo-liberal wet dream of a ruling elite lording it over the subjugated masses.

08 Sep 2011 04:04p.m.

kelvyn wrote:

Schools were not being bullied into compliance. Some of them blatantly refused to follow the requirements set out by the Minister to implement these standards. It is perfectly normal for any employer to set out the employment requirements. For years teachers have been accustomed to having their way, they would have the routine little tantrum and then expect the Ministry to fall in with their demands. It didn't work this time. Suck it in and get over it and get on with it. In the private sector anyone refusing to carry out an employers requirements would have been fired long ago.

08 Sep 2011 03:29p.m.

Clarke wrote:

National standards are one of Nationals stupidest policies... supported only by the utterly moronic. Hence Erm's and wilburs support.. Judging children and then sitting them down to tell them they are failures over and over again is nothing more than a self fufilling prophecy. Its utter stupidity. National standards doesnt say how to fix anything... how to make anythinng better.. its merely a judgement process with no back up or follow through from National. Teachers dont want it because it judges, they dont want it because it means teachers have less time to spend with your kids because of extra paperwork that achieves nothing. Look at the morons for this policy... Erm, Wilbur... our teachers are some of the brightest academics in the country... who is smarter than they are? if they are rebelling against it then you have to ask yourself serious questions about just how good the policy is and what its going to achieve. Its ok for the morons in society like Erm to have a say... but it doesnt make him qualified to have a say. If the teachers our brightest academics dont like it... then its probably simply because its a policy that will do more harm than good. Erms a Maori hating, beneficiary bashing red neck.. anything that he says if good for the country we should do the exact opposite of. He would knock off the sick given half a chance.

08 Sep 2011 02:58p.m.

Wilbur wrote:

Rubbish! At least National Standards will make it possible to clearly guage the skills obtained by students. NCEA (introduced by Labour) is failing our Teenagers. It encourages Labour's political correctness by ensuring the wee dears cant fail....they only suffer from delayed success. In some cases students can gain a whole years worth of credits a full year in advance....a far better example of a flawed mechanism don't you think? And as for putting students in one box or pigeon hole...how about Labour's stupid idea to mainstream all students regardless of how damaged they are? This means putting dangerously disturbed children back in the classroom with other students.

08 Sep 2011 02:31p.m.

Erm... wrote:

It's a democracy, people. If you don't like it, vote against it at the next election. But put up with it until then - that's what separates us from tinpot countries.