Sea Shepherd crew must be punished - protestors

23 Feb 2012 09:53a.m.

Ian Marriott wrote:

it's time Japan backed down and act with honour if they know what that means, how can killing the next most important animals on this planet be right if not the we as the consumers of the world must stop buying Japanese goods

20 Mar 2010 11:20a.m.

john wrote:

questions ;did the japonese drive thier ships 3000 miles to do circles around and crash into the andy gil?/was the andygil insured? and if so what does his claims adjuster say about this collision? unless he was foolish enough to drive around in a 3.5 million dollar boat without insurance. the collission was on purpose, another stunt for the media, by a bunch of eco terrorist , there's not much else can be concluded by thier actions, buy the hype live the lies tell the aussie not to shoot crocs and rabbits and kangeroos , dont see much protest there

16 Mar 2010 03:47p.m.

timmy wrote:

eredwen, "Like humans, they feed their young with milk." Cows do that too. Whales aren't special. "their numbers are in serious decline." Their numbers WERE in serious decline. That's because there was about 200 years of almost unfettered access by whaling fleets to whale stocks. These days whale numbers for some species are increasing, and with respect to those Japan wants to catch some. The IWC confirms that it can allocate sustainable catch quotas. So the reason for opposing this is? You can't tell another people what they may or may not eat. You have no such right. Japan is doing research, but the research is designed to assist the calculation of sustainable catch quotas. You may not like it, but sorry, that's IWC rules.