• Full Story

Security cameras needed - Taxi Fed

Print

Tue, 02 Feb 2010 5:42a.m.

Taxi Drivers wait at the scene where Co-Op driver Hiren Mohini was stabbed during a robbery (NZPA)

Taxi Drivers wait at the scene where Co-Op driver Hiren Mohini was stabbed during a robbery (NZPA)

As the hunt for the killer of Auckland cabbie Hiren Mohini intensifies, the Taxi Federation has called for a loan system to help drivers install security cameras.

Mr Mohini, 39, died after being repeatedly stabbed by a passenger and crashing his car in View Road, Mt Eden, about 1.20am on Sunday. Police described it as frenzied attack and said yesterday a knife was found at the scene.

The Taxi Federation wants security cameras to be installed in all taxis, but has said the cost could be too prohibitive for some drivers.

So it has suggested the Government help with a loan scheme and hopes to talk with Transport Minister Steven Joyce in a couple of weeks.

"A lot in the industry..are leading a hand-to-mouth existence and they don't have the funds available to do it, so hopefully in these discussions with the minister we may be able to organise some sort of loan guarantee scheme," federation executive director Tim Reddish told Radio New Zealand's Checkpoint programme.

Mr Joyce said yesterday taxi safety did need to be looked at again and one of the challenges was getting those in the industry to agree on what mandatory measures needed to be taken.

"The Taxi Federation feels very strongly that cameras would have a deterrent effect ... and there are taxi drivers who feel very strongly that the only safe option are screens."

Screens could limit the number of passengers a taxi can hold and the cost about $1,000-$2,000 to install, he said.

There was also a responsibility by taxi owners and companies to provide a safe workplace, "and ultimately this will have to be borne by the taxi industry".

Prime Minister John Key, however, did not rule out Government funding yesterday and said all options would be considered.

Mr Joyce is due to meet transport and labour departmental officials within the next fortnight.

Police said was possible more than one person was involved on the attack on Mr Mohini.

"I would urge the offender or offenders to come forward, or anyone who knows them, to tell us about it. Obviously they would have been covered in blood to some extent, and would be acting differently to normal," Detective Senior Sergeant Hywel Jones told reporters.

The man seen fleeing the scene was described as slim, dark-skinned in his mid to late 20s, about 1.74m tall, possibly with a limp. He had long, greasy wavy or curly hair, which was swept back from his forehead.

He was wearing dark jeans, black shoes, a long-sleeved shirt and carrying a black bag with a strap.

Mr Mohini died at the scene as the result of multiple stab wounds inside his car, Mr Jones said.

"It was a particularly vicious, brutal and frenzied attack."

NZPA

 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

21 Feb 2011 10:57a.m.

KJ wrote:

As a female driver and Manager. I drive at night to get people especially females home safe. Most times they don't have money. So don't talk unless you have facts. We look after our drivers and the public. If shopkeepers dion't want their shops smashed early hours, we can shift all cabbies to suburbs, easy. Most of you don't realise costs involved in running taxi's, but after a few beers, you expect us to be your saviours. Get real - It's attitude - They work 12-13 hours, from 6pm-6am. They have to smile and be courteous thruout. You hold a job in an office day in day out with a smiling face for 6days a week. See how you feel after cleaning sick, urine and others things YOU have to pay for. Someone said walk - what about old folk with shopping. You all need to GET REAL. Come out and drive for a month, and lets hear your stories!!!

04 Feb 2010 05:24p.m.

Rajesh wrote:

Hi,

I totally agree with Ajay in this aspect Ricki has got his own opinion but it's about somebody's life at least the Govt can give intrest free loan to the cabbie's that would be much helpful.

some people like Ricki doesn't no what they are talking about.I don't no wether he has ever done public service or not how mean people can be.I am sorry Ricki but people who can think like you can think like you are not any better than the guy who kill the cabbie.

03 Feb 2010 07:18p.m.

Ajay wrote:

i agree with you that tax payers shouldn'y pay for installing shields or cameras because it's drivers' own business? but what about after an incident? when the sole bread earner for the family is gone, then do the tax payers want to keep paying the benifit to their family all life..?
also the tax payers are already paying for all the criminals in the prisons.when the tax payers can cover the full costs of the five star facilities provided to the law breakers, can't they pay a part for the well being of the law abiders??? also once the killer in the present killing is imprisoned, all the tax payers would pay for him , while he would be in prison, would that cost be more or less than the subsidy needed to install safety shields? also that can save someone's life!! my dear a society doen't diminsh by the activity of the bad people, but by the inactivity of good people. in addition, believe in, " do good, feel good " phenomenon

02 Feb 2010 01:27p.m.

Nina O'Fyth wrote:

Give the national contract to deliver customers from A to B to NZ Post. Based on their performance with mail, everyone (including criminals) will soon realise that it's quicker to walk.

02 Feb 2010 12:49p.m.

Alien wrote:

It is up to the cab companies if they want to protect their drivers, so far they haven't cared about the safety of their drivers and just moan each time their is an attack. I guess cab companies don't really value the life of their employee

02 Feb 2010 12:11p.m.

rob wrote:

Us taxpayers should not need to pay for these security cameras or the screening, I agree with Ricki, unless the government themselves own the taxi companies they should be funding them, why should they get special attention and be paid for by the government, it's the responsibilities of these Taxi companies, the government aint paying for my security in my home or car why should these taxis get some?

02 Feb 2010 11:02a.m.

DAN wrote:

I agree with Ian. Screens are much better. I have seen them in NYC cabbies and they seem to work fine excepting ofcourse if some nut job has a firearm.

02 Feb 2010 08:56a.m.

Ian wrote:

We must keep the knife from puncturing the skin; NOT take a
photo of a murder happening!!! SCREENS are the thing!!!

02 Feb 2010 08:45a.m.

Ricki wrote:

Cab drivers are in the thick of it, in the sence of updated news and gossip etc, they know how dangerous it is out there and if they dont know by now then they shouldnt be driving. Safety is their own responsability, it comes with progress in any industry and I undertsand how it can be for them as I have been in it also.

But for some PC waller to come out and say the government should pay for cameras or any security is just pathetic, since when did the government own the taxi business?
And Im dam sure I dont want my tax paying to upgrade someones cab, if theyre going to pay for cab security then how about the government paying for an alarm in my new house? There is just as much a risk of home invasion in Auckland suburbs as there is a cab driver getting stabbed, lets see those statistics!

Where do you draw the line?