Sharapova fires shot after pay equality challenge
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 1:24p.m.
Maria Sharapova mocked Frenchman Gilles Simon today for saying women do not deserve the same prize money as men, pointing out dryly that "there are a few more people that watch my matches than his".
Sharapova, the top seed at Wimbledon, said after reaching the third round by beating Tsvetana Pironkova that women had fought long and hard to win equal pay in tennis.
"It was a big challenge and nobody supported us," the world number one said. "It's been a few years since we have gotten that. We're all really proud of it and we continue to build the sport and make it bigger."
Four-times Wimbledon champion Serena Williams also pitched into the row.
"She's way hotter than he is," quipped the American in reference to her great Russian rival.
Simon must have wondered what hit him at his post-match news conference after losing in the second round to Belgian Xavier Malisse, in which 15 of the 16 questions thrown at him were about the prize money issue.
He was quick to point out that even spectators have to fork out 15 pounds more for the men's final than the women's showpiece match.
"Just check the price of the ticket from the men's final and the woman's final for example. That's the way it works in life.
"I have the feeling that men's tennis is actually more interesting than women's tennis," the 13th seed said, insisting it was all about entertainment and not who played the best of five sets as the men do or three like the women.
"When Shakira is singing, she is earning more money than most of the men because everyone wants to see her," Simon said. "That's it."
Simon said he was pretty sure that most male players felt the same way as he did when he talked to them in the locker room.
"Maybe they can't say it, maybe they won't, maybe they will lose, I don't know, $2 million on the contracts if they say that."
After losing in straight sets to Malisse, one reporter suggested that Simon should forfeit 20% of his match fee because he had failed to deliver value for money.
"Maria is more famous than me," Simon said. "I know it. She deserves to win more money than me. That's not the problem."
Williams believes the women's game, frequently criticised in comparison with men's tennis which is enjoying a golden era on the back of the huge rivalries among the three top players, Novak Djokovic, Rafa Nadal and Roger Federer, was worth the money.
"Women's tennis is really awesome," Williams said. "It's a great fight. We fought for years with Billie Jean King and Venus (Serena's sister) as well."
All four grand slam tournaments pay the same prize money to men and women, with Wimbledon bringing in equal pay in 2007.
Stacey Allaster, chief executive of the Women's Tennis Association, issued a statement in response to the latest row.
"Tennis, including the grand slams, is aligned with our modern, progressive society when it comes to the principle of equality," Allaster said.
"I can't believe in this day and age that anyone can still think otherwise. This type of thinking is exactly why the WTA was founded and we will always fight for what's right."
Post a Comment
Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide
(Won't be published)
30/06/2012 9:00:33 a.m.
They should change tennis to match pay equity.Either increase the womens tennis from 3 sets to 5, or decrease the mens from 5 sets to 3.This playing different games for the same pay is bullshit! It would be like a guy works 8 hours a day, but the female gets the same pay for turning up for 4 hours - thats not equity but inequity.They could be like other sports, remove gender and allow men vs women. Many sports have no gender bias, where they use the same equipment against each other under the same rules. Should Danica Patrick get it easier as a driver than men just because she is a woman? She just asks for an equitable chance, not more than equity!
30/06/2012 4:49:07 a.m.
Lindsay G wrote:
I think the bit everyone seems to miss out on the reporting of this discussion is with the Ladies playing 3 sets instead of 5, it means they are able to play doubles and mixed doubles in the same tournament hence doubling or tripling their income. This is the reason the Williams sisters only need to play a handful of tournaments a year.
This is the reason the guys are asking for equality again, especially as the girls are now physically capable of playing 5 sets in the 4 grandslam tournaments.
30/06/2012 12:17:20 a.m.
Dean Shipman wrote:
If the women think their tennis is so good why do they not play the best of 5,which is what the men have to do to get their money.Even in squash which is questionably physically harder the women play the same matches (out of5) that the men do.Come on ladies, the tennis is ok,but step up and play 5 setters tp show us you are equal......
The Chiefs have beaten the Crusaders 28-19 in a tight affair...
Video highlights, live stream commentary, live updates as th...
While sports like rugby often struggle to keep their best pl...
While the Otago Highlanders are bottom of the Super Rugby ta...
An emotional Ali Williams has called full time on his All Bl...
Copyright © 2013 MediaWorks TV. All Rights Reserved.