Shipwrecked students drifted in rafts for 24 hours

Print

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 6:03p.m.

The students included Auckland teenager Mei Barry

The students included Auckland teenager Mei Barry

By Jane Luscombe

An international investigation is planned into why dozens of shipwrecked students were left clinging to life rafts, in high seas, for two days.

The S V Concordia’s captain, William Curry, was amazed none of the 48 students on board when down with the ship.

“I suppose you could use the word miracle for this,” he says. “It was fortunate that the students were in class and on deck – otherwise it might have turned out differently.”

The captain blamed the sinking on a microburst. The ship heeled to one side, and as it did the storm sails were filled by a sudden, violent downdraft of wind that forced it over. Within 15 seconds windows started to pop in, and the boat began sinking.

Twenty minutes later, The Concordia was gone completely.

Having survived the sinking, the crew and students found themselves clinging to life rafts 550kms from land, fearing starvation and a lonely death. The crew set off a satellite emergency transmitter – but it was more than a day before the signal was picked up.

The students included Auckland teenager Mei Barry, who had never sailed before, and before leaving had confessed to her father, Desmond, she was scared about the trip.

“Thirty hours in the ocean, the boat has gone under – they’re just in life rafts not knowing if anyone knew they were there or not,” says Mr Barry of his daughter’s ordeal.

They were adrift for two days before being rescued. Today, Mr Barry and his wife Yoshiko were finally able to reach Mei in Brazil.

The 17-year-old was still shaken when 3 News spoke to her today.

“It’s just overwhelming,” she said. “It’s so confusing.”

A New Zealand diplomat is helping until Mr Barry can get to Brazil, and says Mei is doing “really well”.

“She’s lost everything. We asked what she wanted, she said some New Zealand lollies,” says Mr Barry.

A British maritime agency will be investigating why it took so long for the emergency beacon to be detected.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

28 Feb 2010 03:33p.m.

someone who actually knows... wrote:

I can tell you both that this vessel was very well equipped, prepared, staffed and maintained! 20,000nm in a 29 footer and you think you're some kind of expert??? These kids (not to mention the professional crew) sailed nearly this far in a single semester and some of these kids were onboard for nearly two years!!! This ship had sailed close to 750,000nm in its 18 year career all around the world and in all kinds of conditions! Tall ships are nothing like tiny trailer-sailers! Closing all hatches and vents means shutting down air conditioning, generators and every other system a ship relies on to function normally!

As for the Brazilian Navy/MRCC and pointing the finger? Well what kind of Marine Rescue Control Centre receives an EPIRB Distress signal and then sits on it for over a day before even sending a plane on a flight of a little over an hour to find out what's wrong??? Not to mention the politicking and cowboy stunts they pulled later on once everyone was onboard the merchant ships who rescued them!

The Brazilian Navy didn't rescue anyone - it was two MOL ships (http://www.mol.co.jp/pr-e/2010/e-pr-1012.html) who conducted the rescue! The photo op on the navy ship at the end was a setup to cover their backsides!

Mr L - you should actually learn about the search and rescue system before you make ridiculous assertions. And the vessel was flying a Barbados not a Bermudan flag! The cost of flagging any ship in Canada is prohibitively high - how many ocean going ships of any kind have you seen flying a maple leaf? This ship complied with Lloyds requirements and voluntarily complied with SOLAS regs designed for much larger ships in addition to Flag State laws!

If only you two knew knew better you'd be ashamed at your comments! Yes the investigation needs to find out exactly why it sank and how to prevent this happening again, but here's a suggestion: How about you save your opinions for a topic you actually have some relevant knowledge about!

22 Feb 2010 10:55a.m.

ERNST L. wrote:

A KNOCKDOWN ON A WELL PREPARED VESSEL SHOULD NOT SINK IT! THE WINDOWS WERE BREAKING? WHY WERE THERE NOT SEAWORTHY PORTS AND LIGHTS ON THIS VESSEL. IT WAS STORMY AND FROM THE STATEMENT THERE WAS VERY ROUGH SEAS. I ALWAYS, ESPECIALLY WITH OTHERS WITH ME, REEF SAILS FURTHER THAN SEEMS NECCESSARY IN ORDER TO BE READY FOR UNTOWARD EVENTS. THIS IS JUST GOOD SEAMANSHIP. IN MY OVER 20,000 NAUTICAL MILES,IN A 29.5 FOOT SLOOP, I'VE GONE THROUGH STORMS, SQUALL CHAINS AND HURRICANE WITH NO DAMAGE.I WOULD THINK THAT A BOAT OF THIS SIZE, INTENDED FOR YOUNG FOLKS TO SAIL WOULD BE BETTER PREPARED AND STAFFED THAN I WAS. PORTS OR LIGHTS SHOULD BE OF A STRENGTH TO WITHSTAND TIPOVERS AND THE VERY HARD SHOCK OF SEAS HITTING THEM. I WOULD REALLY LIKE TO KNOW IF THE HATCHS AND PASSAGEWAYS WERE SECURED, AS THEY SHOULD BE WHEN ROUGH SEA ARE EXPECTED. THAT HAS BEEN THE DOWNFALL OF MORE THAN ONE CRAFT.

I HOPE THE INVESTIGATION WILL SHOW WHY THIS HAPPENED AND HELP TO PREVENT FUTURE, MORE DEADLY DISTRUCTION.

22 Feb 2010 09:09a.m.

James L. wrote:

Before criticizing the Brazilian Navy it must be clearly understood why the vessel sank. It seems to me that the head of Class Afloat, Mr. Nigel McCarthy, president of Lunenburg, N.S.,-based West Island College International, which offered the floating classroom program, is desperately trying to point fingers and attention into another direction. Mr. McCarthy should understand why the boat under his ultimate responsibility sank, instead of questioning timeliness of rescue response. Was the vessel well equipped? Was the crew well prepared and trained? Was there a failure in navigation or bad weather avoidance? Brazil has a HUGE coast, just look at a world map. I imagine distress signals are received by the Brazilian Navy on a daily basis. A better understanding of procedures and response times is necessary, but the main question here is why were these kids in an unseaworthy sailing ship? Why was the vessel flying a Canadian flag if it was registered in Bermuda? Mr. McCarthy, were you trying to avoid more stringent safety standards and taxes? Also, who will be paying the Brazilian Navy and the Brazilian people for the successful rescue efforts? Hopefully the families of these rich kids won’t stick it up the poor Brazilian people, on top of blaming their navy for a slow response.