• Full Story

Speeding cops accumulate 64 percent more tickets

Print

Mon, 05 Dec 2011 8:21a.m.

The surge echoes the almost 100 per cent increase in total speeding tickets issued in 2010

The surge echoes the almost 100 per cent increase in total speeding tickets issued in 2010

The number of speeding tickets issued to police jumped 64 percent last year compared with the previous five years, new information reveals.

Figures released this week under the Official Information Act show speeding police officers were handed 941 speed camera notices in 2010, with about half paid and half waived.

Wellington cops were the biggest speedsters, forking out to pay 60 tickets, followed by Auckland's Counties Manukau and Waitemata on 58 and 50 paid tickets respectively, according to a report in the Otago Daily Times.

In the South Island, the fastest officers came from the Southern District, where 38 offences were acknowledged.

In the previous five years police recorded 2874 speed camera offences, with 1251 fines paid and 1623 waived which is considerably less than 2010 figures.

The surge echoes the almost 100 percent increase in total speeding tickets issued in 2010, a figure road policing national manager Superintendent Paula Rose said reflects a tougher stance on holiday speeding and better use of digital speed cameras.

She told the newspaper that police could be excused from ticket payment if they can prove they were "engaged on urgent duty and compliance with the speed limit would be likely to prevent the execution of the officer's duty".

However, Ms Rose says they could not drive in a dangerous or reckless manner.

"Police officers are required to provide an explanation for speed offences and are held accountable for any breaches of speed-related legislation for which there is no justification or legal defence."

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

05 Dec 2011 08:27p.m.

Dan wrote:

@ Homer: Of course they should be abiding by the law at all times and they are as long as they're only speeding in order to fulfil their lawful duties. Those who failed to produce a sufficient justification still had to pay their fine but I agree that they should not have been breaking the law in the first place.

05 Dec 2011 03:59p.m.

Homer wrote:

@Dan, to be fair, should all police not be setting an example to the public? How can they expect everyone to follow the law if they cannot follow it themselves.

05 Dec 2011 01:13p.m.

Dan wrote:

@ Nigel: To be fair they are held accountable. As the article states only about half the fines were waived and they needed to provide a justification for that. Police don't have a licence to speed any more than we do and members of the public also have a necessity defence if we're speeding in an emergency e.g. getting someone to the hospital before they bleed out.

05 Dec 2011 10:04a.m.

nigel wrote:

So what is it one rule for us and one rule for them? They are allowed to use cell phones and speed with practical impunity and I thought these things were dangerous, apparently not!