• Full Story

Study urges smoking ban outside bars

Print

Tue, 21 Feb 2012 1:05p.m.

Those in the study found it very difficult to reconcile their stated identity as non-smokers who smoke

Those in the study found it very difficult to reconcile their stated identity as non-smokers who smoke

Banning smoking in areas outside bars could help stamp out "social smoking", or people who smoke only when they are drinking, say health researchers at Otago University.

They carried out in-depth interviews in 2011 with 13 "social smokers," aged between 19 and 25, and all but one of them supported such a ban, according to the research published in the journal Tobacco Control.

International evidence indicates that, while smoking has decreased overall, social smoking has increased among young adults.

Those in the study found it very difficult to reconcile their stated identity as non-smokers ... who smoke.

They rationalised the non-smoker definition by saying they only smoked when they were drinking.

They described smoking and drinking as going "hand in hand".

More fundamentally, alcohol enabled them to absolve themselves of responsibility for their actions, which they inevitably regretted.

Drinking thus supported and even induced "binge smoking" and yet also distanced them from this behaviour, enabling them to maintain their "non-smoker" persona, the authors said.

"Some nights I can smoke 14/15 ciggies or a pack while I'm drinking but I can never do that without alcohol," one respondent said.

All but one of those in the survey said they supported the idea of smoke-free areas outside bars to help decouple smoking and drinking.

"Introducing smokefree outdoors bars could reduce social smoking by removing cues that stimulate this behaviour and changing the environment that facilitates it," said lead author, Professor Janet Hoek.

Other Otago University researchers have suggested alcohol laws should be strengthened to help people give up smoking, as heavy drinking made it harder for people to quit smoking.

 
NZN
Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

23 Feb 2012 06:54p.m.

Shaun wrote:

The effects of tobacco impose their own duty, and their own prohibition that smokers often fail to account for. To paraphrase Benno, with the emphasis on these effects: "Wake up smokers, before you have no freedom left".

22 Feb 2012 03:01p.m.

bonnie wrote:

we pay a huge amount on tax for smokes! our tax probably paid for the footpaths outside the bars. and if no one smoked where they gnna get all that tax money from aye? i pay $13 in tax for a pak of 20s, and if its about the health system then they better tax everyone that does something bad for there health, people with dangerous recreational activites. And how much does all this anti smokin campaining cost?

22 Feb 2012 12:11p.m.

Esmi wrote:

Oh, yes, lets introduce a law restricting the freedom of all of our adult citizens based on the opinion of THIRTEEN PEOPLE...! How silly. I'm not a smoker but I don't think prohibition is a good thing. I do know from personal experience that the phenomenon of 'binge smoking' is real: my flatmate used to hardly ever smoke during the week but when she went out on the weekend she might smoke a whole pack! I wonder if selling cigarettes in a smaller pack - say, of five - would be a good idea? Statistically, if you smoke five or fewer cigarettes per day, you have the same chance of getting cancer as somebody who doesn't smoke at all. You could just get your little pack for the night and that would be your allowance.

21 Feb 2012 06:41p.m.

Stewmazza wrote:

More like "Human Control" rather than Tobacco Control. Looks like they're into the alcohol control business as well. Like Benno Wake up NZ!

21 Feb 2012 05:55p.m.

Andrew Harris wrote:

I love the illusion that individuals actually believe they live in a free democratic society. Guys read some books. NZ is particularly good in using unobtrusive power to sanction decisions already made by a few. Consider, if I have a net worth equal to the countries GDP who do you believe has more influence in government decisions, you as a tax payer or me as someone who controls the NZ credit rating, investment et al? Voting is a game to ease social conscience, you have no power. As for nannying of citizens it doesn't surprise me at all.

21 Feb 2012 05:49p.m.

Annette wrote:

So the Otago University study on social smokers was taken from a sample of 13 people. This has to be a joke!! Thirteen people and they want to change the law on the basis of it. Do we really pay them for this rubbish? Haven't they got anything better to do for heavens sake?

21 Feb 2012 05:47p.m.

kane wrote:

Mean while a child is murdered... The whole smoking beat up is pretty boring now... Fact is I meet a lot of tourist outside bars enjoying a smoke... Its expensive for a night out anyway and will just make our country less appealing for visitors and would mean a big down turn for small bars and clubs... Its like why dont people travel to Iraq its manly because alcohol is illegal their... Why do people travel to places like Fiji and the islands India south Africa and so on because its cheap relaxing may cost a fortune to get their but once your their its generally pretty cheap... Getting off topic but I would like to know how much fun you can have in NZ with only 100 dollars for a night out... Not much

21 Feb 2012 04:15p.m.

b wrote:

And here I was thinking we had a free,democratic society.
Love the huge numbers and specific age groups they surveyed.

21 Feb 2012 02:34p.m.

Jack wrote:

and what good will that do, ban smoking?! ban the whole lot if you want to stay consistent but banning substances is not the answer the 40+ years has achieved nothing its just made the prison system full petty criminals hardened criminals and ripped families and communities apart with drug gangs.

21 Feb 2012 02:31p.m.

k wrote:

Banning them at music festvals would be a good idea too. But there should be the ability of someone to set up a smoking specific cafe or whatever to cater for these people.