Sue Bradford receives death threat via Twitter

Print

Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:00a.m.

Henk Van Helmond admits GarfieldNZ is his Twitter account

Henk Van Helmond admits GarfieldNZ is his Twitter account

By Rebecca Wright

Green MP Sue Bradford is no stranger to threats – but this is the first time she’s had a threat like this.

An anonymous threat directed as Ms Bradford was posted on social networking site Twitter, under the pseudonym GarfieldNZ.

“Sue Bradford is still a good candidate for New Zealand’s first political assassination,” the post reads.

Today 3 News tracked the man behind GarfieldNZ down in Woodville, Manawatu.

Henk Van Helmond admits GarfieldNZ is his Twitter account, but denies he is the author of the threat.

He claims someone has hacked his profile.

But it soon became clear, Mr Van Helmond is no fan of Ms Bradford.

He also hosts a site called Cyfswatch – which Ms Bradford has come across before, in 2007.

“It was basically encouraging people to take violent action against me – that was the worst part,” she says.

“They were encouraging people to try and find my home address.”

The latest threats against the author of the anti-smacking law appear to have been prompted by the recent referendum, which has reignited the debate.

“It was always upsetting to read really virulent and ugly abuse, but it also makes me more determined to carry on – I have never been one to buckle to threats or to that kind of abuse.”

NetSafe New Zealand says there are actions open to those who are being abused on social networking sites like Twitter.

“You can go to the provider of the service – whether it is Twitter or Bebo or MySpace – and make a complaint to them. They have Terms of Service and if people breach those then they will take action as well,” says Martin Crockere of NetSafe.

That is exactly what Ms Bradford says she is going to do.

She has also referred several emails she has received to police.

While they usually come anonymously, police say they do have the power to track their authors.

In fact, 3 News understands one of those emails has resulted in a prosecution that is underway right now.

3 News
Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

03 Sep 2009 02:03p.m.

TimM wrote:

The police wouldn't define that as a threat, they won't take any action. Regardless of whether Henk sent it or not (as he is saying) Bradford has used it (and TV3) for political grandstanding. In all the interviews I've seen with her she's never been able to string two propositions together to support a conclusion without creating a fallacy, and this one was no exception.

03 Sep 2009 05:35a.m.

SteveO wrote:

At least Sue had the will/brains to go to Parliament to fight for her point of view - successfully - Henk sounds like a snivelling, litigious, coward caught in the headlights. Try unlocking your radio's tuner off talkback 24/7. A chronic case of blaming someone, anyone else, except yourself for all your problems. But even cowards can snap, political assassination threats should be taken seriously as they are in every country. Rod, Huang leaving comments saying you agree or sympathise with (even) threats of political assasination is just dumb.

02 Sep 2009 01:04p.m.

Anon wrote:

Damn GarfieldNZ looks like you will never learn. (sigh)

31 Aug 2009 11:33p.m.

dragonwoman60 wrote:

This is unbelieveable - comments directed at a woman who has fought for years for those people in our society who are vulnerable and disadvantaged - but for luck this could be anyone of us at anytime - shouldn't be surprising that Sue now decides to fight for children's rights to non violence in the one place where they should be safe - their family - she has sacrificed hers and her family's privacy - and her reward this is to be the targetted with this s*** - cease immediately and get a life - preferably one where you build up postive karma -

31 Aug 2009 01:50p.m.

You R. Fullofit wrote:

Henk you are so full of it. I've had dealings with you before and you are a VISCIOUS TROUBLEMAKER. Then when you got trapped in a corner with your own mouthing off, you told me that I caused you to get sicker and threatened legal action. Sound familiar? Basically you are known for this kind of behaviour and it surprises no one who has had the misfortune of knowing you or being stung by your cruelty.

31 Aug 2009 01:09p.m.

Huang wrote:

Why am I not surprised? When you poured scorn on 80+% NO, you should expect some empty threats from irate parents who felt that you are interfering with their parenting, and splitting their families. I would not be surprised too if any of the YES lobby made these threats to make the NO people looks bad. Whichever, you started it!

31 Aug 2009 09:34a.m.

Henk Van Helmond wrote:

You may all want to read this. http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/2816986/Man-denies-sending-Sue-Bradford-death-threat If people did not have the idea to kill Sue before, they do now, thanks to Sue herself because she is a media whore. rather than allow Police to sort the matter out, Sue went to the media. For that reason, I am considering legal action against Sue Bradford. The CYFSwatch site is still hosted by me, but run by new people, it does not condone death threats of any kind from anyone. The twitter account that was hacked was my personal non political means to have fun, but now Sue has taken that from me in her quest for attention. Shame on TV3 for turning one of the few means for me to have fun into a political story. I am disabled and unable to get out and have fun like I used to. Were the photo's really necessary? I have apologised to Sue constantly and she ignored that, she continues to spin her line that she is a victim, Sue, that is so dishonest. You don't care about anyone as long as you get the media attention you so crave. As for your supporters, from what I have seen above, they are the worst of the worst. A number of months ago, all my websites were hacked and deleted, did i go to the media accusing the Bradford supporters of having done it? No, they well have done it, who knows. Sue Bradford should have gone to the Police and let them sort it out, by going to media, she has given people ideas, so she is lying when she says she is afraid, she only wanted the attention. If TV3 persists in taking her spin on this, then I will add them to any legal action as well for harassment.

31 Aug 2009 08:55a.m.

Rod wrote:

Yes the guy is a complete nut case, but so is Sue! There is some truth in the statement, if someone was going to get "offed", good money would be say that it would be Sue (not by me or anyone I know! NOT A THREAT, NOT A THREAT) "Dogs of a feather bark together" Sue is the maddest barking dog of them all, it makes sense that that she attracts others that are barking mad.

31 Aug 2009 06:00a.m.

Hmmm wrote:

Isn't it strange that a person who hates Sue Bradford so much would hack into the Twitter account of a person who hates Sue Bradford just as much to post this threat? Considering the man behind the site is as nutty as a peanut butter sandwich and has a history of making threats... yeah Henk, your protestations of innocence are pretty weak.

31 Aug 2009 05:02a.m.

Sue Bradfard wrote:

I detest this!