• Full Story

Supercity debate turns nasty

Print

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 9:08a.m.

Auckland City Mayor John Banks and North Shore Mayor Andrew Williams (NZPA file)

Auckland City Mayor John Banks and North Shore Mayor Andrew Williams (NZPA file)

North Shore Mayor Andrew Williams has accused John Banks of lying and "verging on defamation" after a heated public debate turned personal.

The pair was attending a debate at Castor Bay Church Hall on the North Shore on Wednesday evening when the meeting soured. Super city candidate Simon Prast said it looked as though a fight might break out.

“For a moment there I thought there would be mayoral fisticuffs,” he told the New Zealand Herald.

Were you there? 3 News would like to hear from you - email noles@tv3.co.nz.

Witnesses say after Mr Banks addressed a question from the public he was accused by Mr Williams of lying, he then responded to the North Shore Mayor with “stop drinking”.

At this reply, Mr Williams reportedly stood up and approached Mr Banks calling him out for his comment.

Mr Williams says the meeting was derailed by a small group of Banks supporters heckling other candidates.

“They are constantly interjecting and haranguing many of the candidates but in particular Len Brown and myself, using insulting and demeaning personal attacks,” he said in a statement today.

The North Shore Mayor says Mr Banks, egged on by his supporters, embarked on personal attacks during the debate.

“It appears his transmogrification to the new nicer John Banks is over as he begins to feel the pressure of his chances in the mayoral campaign. It is very apparent that the old Banks is back.”

Mr Williams has been dogged by comments about his alleged drinking habits ever since being caught urinating outside North Shore's council offices after an evening out.

3 News / RadioLIVE

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

14 Sep 2010 07:51a.m.

Helen1 wrote:

Get your act together guys or youll miss the point and your time is up to represent your constituents Stop squabbling! and get on with it. We need leaders not loiters!

13 Sep 2010 05:40p.m.

Mike wrote:

To Veteran44 I say butt out, the issue has nothing to do with you and your contribution is of little importance because of where you have unfortunately chosen to live. To Steveo and Liz, I must agree. Williams seems to be a lush and not capable in my opinion of holding office anywhere, or deserving of respect by anyone because of his night time urinating escapades and abusive e-mail attacks on highly respectable targets in the early morning hours after apparent drinking bouts and very little rational thought. To "RA" and 'Jim', I say get a life. The facts show Banks is the only candidate who has proven beyond a doubt, is capable of delivering what he promises and unlike Brown has no history of deceit or ever spending tax payer money for personal purchases. Neither does Banks have an unholy alliance or relationship of any kind with 'renta mob' Sue Bradford who Brown seems unwilling to deny is likely to be part of his core council group if he is unfortunately elected mayor.

10 Sep 2010 10:55p.m.

Jim wrote:

John Banks and his supporters, are bullies, much like Hyde and his supporters. The tactic of the bully is to provoke a reaction and then blame the poor sod they target for his 'bad behaviour'. Using heckling and defamation, and threatening violence, hearkens back to when Banks was head of the 'Red Squad' during the Springbok tour in 81. Wasn't Banks responsible for directing the Police to assault masses of peaceful protestors, including the very young and the elderly? I'd rather have a 'drunk' (and what politician isn't?) than a psychotic violent tyrant whose methods have in the past included directing his Junta to kick their way through a seated crowd of people (the 'Flying V'). Banks does not deserve the mayoralty, and Aucklanders deserve better than Banks.

10 Sep 2010 10:55p.m.

Jim wrote:

John Banks and his supporters, are bullies, much like Hyde and his supporters. The tactic of the bully is to provoke a reaction and then blame the poor sod they target for his 'bad behaviour'. Using heckling and defamation, and threatening violence, hearkens back to when Banks was head of the 'Red Squad' during the Springbok tour in 81. Wasn't Banks responsible for directing the Police to assault masses of peaceful protestors, including the very young and the elderly? I'd rather have a 'drunk' (and what politician isn't?) than a psychotic violent tyrant whose methods have in the past included directing his Junta to kick their way through a seated crowd of people (the 'Flying V'). Banks does not deserve the mayoralty, and Aucklanders deserve better than Banks.

10 Sep 2010 06:18p.m.

R.A wrote:

In all seriousness there are enough signals to suggest John Banks is mentally unballanced and has been for his entire life . How that nutter ever got to be mayor ...........

10 Sep 2010 05:01p.m.

Liz wrote:

It is well known Andrew Williams is a drunk.

10 Sep 2010 03:30p.m.

steveo wrote:

In all seriousness there are enough signals to suggest Andrew Williams is mentally unbalanced....

10 Sep 2010 02:12p.m.

Veteran44 wrote:

I feel sorry for the Jaffas'. What a choice! Either;
1. a narcissistic Pouter Pidgeon,
2. a Boorish Drunk or,
3. a Fruit Loop!
Enjoy!!!!!!!!!!!!

10 Sep 2010 09:28a.m.

Dan wrote:

POlitics at its best.