3News » Home
Full Story

Sydney pilot praised for crashing plane

1 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
Dominic James lost his plane, but saved his co-pilot and four passengers

Dominic James lost his plane, but saved his co-pilot and four passengers

video
Fri, 20 Nov 2009 5:28p.m.
A Sydney pilot and former Bachelor of the Year nominee has been hailed a hero after crashing his jet into the sea off Norfolk Island.
 
Dominic James lost his plane, but saved his co-pilot and four passengers when they were forced to ditch two kilometres offshore.
 
However, questions are being raised about why the plane ran out of fuel and whether Mr James failed his Qantas pilot exams.
 
Mr James was flying the Westwind jet on a medivac mission for Careflight from Western Samoa to Melbourne, with a re-fuelling stop at Norfolk Island.
 
On board were two crew members, two medics, the patient and her husband.
 
“Their skill in those difficult circumstances – in the dark, on water…managing put that plane down safely was the only reason we all managed to get out in one piece.,” says Dr David Helm, a passenger on the flight.
 
But low clouds and bad weather forced them to circle, until the plane ran out of fuel and was forced to ditch.
 
All six passengers survived, uninjured.
 
“He flew that aircraft as well as any pilot in this world could have flown that aircraft,” says John Sharp from Pel-Air aviation.
 
Comparisons are being made with New York's Hudson River landing.
 
“If you'd spent 90 minutes in the water, in the dark, with the aircraft sunk beside you, you’d know how lucky you'd have been,” says Ian Badham of Careflight.
 
But critics want to know why the plane ran out of fuel, why Mr James did not fly to New Zealand, and whether or not he passed his pilot exams with Qantas.
 
One aviation blogger describes likening this landing to that on the Hudson River as a “load of weak-minded idiotic drivel”.
 
The blogger says Mr James simply ran out of fuel, he did not have an alternate plan, and a full inquiry should be held.
 
3 News
Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [1]

Mark
22 Nov 2009 9:49p.m.

Comparisons to the Hudson River ditching are somewhat irrelevant. Capt. Sullenburger was faced with the uncommanded shutdown/failure of both power-plants over a built up and inhospitable (for a glider) area. He correctly chose the area most likely to lead to the best chance of survival, had very little time in which to execute the plan, and saw it through with a high level of skill. Captain James deliberately ran out of fuel, at night, in a remote location, attempting to land at an aerodrome with known changeable and marginal weather, and was forced to use the skill he had to survive the ditching. Well done. Why did he run out of fuel in the first place? Why does it appear that Mr Sharp is defending the pilots actions in running out of fuel, rather than diverting to an aerodrome with suitable weather? Why were there insufficient life jackets available for all occupants? The real heroes in this story are the Norfolk Islanders who put to sea to rescue them.

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio

Post your opinion