• Full Story

TPK boss to pay back taxpayer money

Print

Wed, 15 Feb 2012 9:11a.m.

Leith Comer (file)

Leith Comer (file)

The head of the Ministry of Maori Development will pay back the taxpayer money he spent on flying his wife to fashion and sports events in Auckland.

Te Puni Kokiri chief executive Leith Comer spent more than $1000 on the taxpayer for flights and accommodation for his wife to attend a Style Pasifika event during the Rugby World Cup, and the Maori Sports Awards, in Auckland last year, Fairfax NZ reports.

It comes at a time when Te Puni Kokiri is looking to slash about 50 jobs.

A Te Puni Kokiri spokeswoman told NZ Newswire on Tuesday evening that Mr Comer would pay back the money as soon as possible.

However, State Services Minister Jonathan Coleman has already asked State Services Commissioner Iain Rennie to take the issue up with Mr Comer.

"I think it is for Mr Comer to explain how he would justify this spending at a time when TPK are looking at redundancies," Mr Coleman says.

"I think it's an issue of judgement and the question is whether good judgement has been exercised and on the face of that, I'd have to say, I have some concerns about that."

Mr Comer told Fairfax NZ he felt it was expected that his wife would join him at events.

"It's an expectation that I think is reasonable - that I invite senior stake holders along with their wife and I think it's appropriate for me to take my wife."

Maori Affairs Minister Pita Sharples defended Mr Comer's stance.

"In the Maori world, you're often expected to turn up with your wife when you're hosting other guest with their wives - it's a natural thing."

However, he says it could be a bad look at a time when jobs at Te Puni Kokiri were being cut.

Whether Mr Comer should have paid for his wife's travel himself was "the big question", Dr Sharples says.

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

18 Feb 2012 11:41a.m.

jan.. wrote:

Comments before me, all firms should allowed extention on spending for such like and pay back, and the 'honesty' is a must as penalty of dishonesty will be serve..

15 Feb 2012 02:58p.m.

Gary wrote:

I think the question should be asked, were the trips necessary at all? If so why and to acheive what? If necessary to add value then it may be expected to attend with his wife

15 Feb 2012 02:04p.m.

cherie wrote:

How much does this turkey get paid and he could find a few hundred for his wife to attended events for the seriously wealthy?

15 Feb 2012 09:47a.m.

Erm... wrote:

If it was anyone else they would be sacked.