TPP could bring tighter trade rules

Print

TPP could bring tighter trade rules

3News NZ

John Key and Barack Obama

John Key and Barack Obama

By Patrick Gower

The legal threat from tobacco companies over the Government's proposal for plain packaging has raised fears about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) - a free trade deal involving the United States - and opponents say it could make legal clashes even more common.

Because of the fears it will get sued under existing international trade laws the Government could back down over its plain-packaging plan for tobacco and the trade deal could mean even tighter trade rules could be on the way too.

Opponents to the deal are calling tighter rules a threat to New Zealand sovereignty.

“It’s designed to take power from Governments and give it to large multinational corporations,” says Green Party co-leader Russel Norman.

The TPP will bring New Zealand and the United States together in an 11-country free trade deal but leaked documents have raised concern it will make it even easier for companies like Big Tobacco to sue countries for unfavourable laws.

“Obviously when you go into a free trade agreement it’s a bit like a marriage,” says Prime Minister John Key.

“There's give and take and you do it because the overall net benefits are greater than what you give away.”

The fear of commitment to the TPP is gripping many, like librarians, who are worried the costs of books could rise if a ban on parallel importing is re-introduced, while others fear it could see copyright codes enforced so DVD players here can't read discs from the United States.

But John Key says free access to the United States market would mean boom-times for the agricultural sector and he used Kim Dotcom as an example of how America will protect its interests in Intellectual Property - no matter what.

“As you can see with or without the TPP the Americans and others will look to protect their rights as they see them,” says Mr Key.

The TPP has just been through its 13th round of negotiations.

There's plenty to gain in the deal- but as to what New Zealand may or may not be giving away, it's hard to tell. One of its opponents' main criticisms is how the deal and its consequences are shrouded in secrecy. 

3 News

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

30/07/2012 9:55:07 a.m.

Ruru wrote:

“Obviously when you go into a free trade agreement it’s a bit like a marriage,” says Prime Minister John Key. A bit like an abusive marriage to a psychopathic control freak. Where they do whatever they like and beat you with great big legal stick if you step out of line. Hey but John reassures us we should "not jump to conclusions" Yea, we should wait until they have done it, so he can ignore our complaints. As usual. Don't want GMO crops? too bad we'll get them or get sued by monsanto. Cigarettes and DVDs are the tip of an iceberg. If its so great why is it so secret, people do good things in the open.

27/07/2012 9:26:42 a.m.

Thomas wrote:

There should not be a need for any secrecy if there is nothing the government fears. Let all NZers know what OUR representatives are trying to do for US!

25/07/2012 10:11:27 a.m.

Al wrote:

I think we should send the United States packing. Having an FTA with them is likely to cost us a lot more than we're ever likely to gain from it.
We don't need them dictating to us what we can and can't do.

But we have a pro-United States PM, so I guess we're screwed.

24/07/2012 10:59:22 p.m.

Shaun wrote:

The full quote is: "We're supporting Australia 100% by the way in terms of these challenges to legislation in Geneva, and we're supporting them morally because we're not involved in their dispute through the Hong Kong investment treaty." (Tim Groser, July 8th, 2012). Read more: http://www.3news.co.nz/Regulating-tobacco-may-hurt-others--Groser/tabid/1607/articleID/260537/Default.aspx#ixzz21XGmQsh3

24/07/2012 10:56:11 p.m.

David wrote:

JOhn Key was elected to serve the interests of large corporations... who do you think financed the majority of both campaigns? He has had meetings with the mining industry and given concessions accordingly for their support... and the same can be said about many other multi National corporations. John Key was bent as a businessman and is even more bent now.

24/07/2012 7:44:57 p.m.

Shaun wrote:

Question for Tim Groser to be asked in Parliament: Does he stand by his statement about plain packaging of cigarettes on TV3's 'The Nation' on July 8th, that: "We are 100% behind Australia", and if not, why not?