• Full Story

Tax hikes won't close wealth gap: English

Print

Wed, 07 Dec 2011 9:17a.m.

Finance Minister Bill English (file pic)

Finance Minister Bill English (file pic)

Taxing the rich is not the way to narrow the gap between rich and poor in New Zealand, Finance Minister Bill English says.

A new OECD report shows the gap is growing faster than in any other developed country and the top 10 per cent now have incomes 10 times that of the poorest 10 percent.

The report, released on Tuesday, says many countries have cut their top tax rates for high earners.

But Mr English says the government has got the tax balance right and closed loopholes.

"No one in New Zealand is proposing significant changes to that - a focus on opportunity, educational achievement and economic growth is the best thing we can do to reduce inequality," he told Radio New Zealand on Wednesday.

Outgoing Labour leader Phil Goff says the gap has widened since National came to power three years ago but admits it began to increase under Labour in the 1980s.

He says the last Labour government under Helen Clark tried to reverse the trend but when National took over it reversed the changes that had been made.

"We've seen more unemployment, many more people on benefits, tax cuts that have given sometimes thousands of dollars a week to the very wealthy while people on low and middle incomes missed out," he said.

The OECD report, called Divided We Stand, works on an inequality index where zero means everybody has the same income and one means the richest person has all the income.

New Zealand scored 0.33, up six percentage points from 1985 when it scored 0.27.

That's the biggest jump of any OECD country.

It's considerably less than the huge margin in the worst countries, Brazil, Russia, China and India, where the wealthy earn 50 times more than the poorest. But New Zealand won the dubious honour of the gap widening the fastest.

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

08 Dec 2011 04:52p.m.

Bruce wrote:

There definitely is a comedian at every step. Whats so funny about id English is, he actually expects to be heard. This is the same man who single-handedly plummeted the Looney Nats support to barely 20% during the 2005 election, when you see his answering a question from the opposition in parliament, he never actually looks at the person who is asking the question. A person who can't look at the person asking the question can not be trusted, chances are high that he is lying. Its all to do with body language. whats so sad about English, the looney Nat supporters actually believe him.

08 Dec 2011 10:24a.m.

Digby Green wrote:

Bill English is right. The only sustainable way to reduce the gap is to encourage a better educated population and to grow the wealth of the whole country. And to stop wasteful spending. (The only problem is that it is going to take a very long time)

08 Dec 2011 07:15a.m.

Alex wrote:

I like the idea of taxing the wealthiest at higher rates than raising the tax on the bottom threshold, raising GST, selling government assets, or cutting government services. In the end, the highest income earners can still afford to live a reasonably good lifestyle, the low income earners won't

07 Dec 2011 03:45p.m.

Jane wrote:

So when Labour were in for nine years I didn't notice the poor were way better off.

07 Dec 2011 03:42p.m.

Bruce wrote:

Mrs Williams are you in NZ? Just wishful thinking perhaps?

07 Dec 2011 01:57p.m.

mrs williams ,kaiapoi wrote:

late votes are nearly finished and it looks like national will be unable to form gov't. a labour coalition is looking likely.

07 Dec 2011 01:34p.m.

madness wrote:

Earn more - pay more, Earn less - pay less
It sounds pretty simple to us you hobo's

07 Dec 2011 12:29p.m.

Seannachie wrote:

The Government may have got the Tax Balance right for Cabinet Ministers with Tax Cuts of up to $52,000 per annum but not right for the rest of us.Lets face it we cant afford the annual deficit of $16 billion to fund Tax Cuts for the Rich. Neither can we afford the annual increase of 7.7% in our Cost of Living caused by the increase in GST to 15% to offset this governments Tax Cuts for the Rich. Accordingly not only is it necessary to Tax the rich more but also as is indicated by the increase in poverty it is necessary to pay people liveable wages for working 40 hour weeks. This government may be to the extreme Right but it clearly has not got things right for 90% of New Zealanders.

07 Dec 2011 12:25p.m.

Homer wrote:

Why doesn't Bill English be truthful and tell us they won't change anything because for them it's about caring for the rich and not the poor. The gap is only going to get wider under National.

07 Dec 2011 10:21a.m.

Ruz wrote:

I guess the first point to make is that neither National nor Labour are rejecting the OECD finding about the widening gap. Where the parties differ is how to fix it. Labour wants a change to the tax system to target the wealthy while National thinks that increasing employment will solve the problems. As I see it neither will work. It is an inditement on both parties that all of their policies over the past 20 years have failed to significantly advance New Zealand’s economic growth. We are barely keeping up.