3News » Home

Tax-onomy: The Tax the Government Doesn’t Talk About

Tue, 15 Jun 2010 1:52p.m.

By Fiona Hodge

Exactly who else inhabits our world? It’s the sort of question you might think had been answered by now… but we’re still struggling to get to know our neighbours. We don’t even know the size of the neighbourhood: estimates of species number range from 5 million to 100 million species. So far science has identified about 2 million. Why? Well quantifying the biodiversity on planet Earth is much like doing a fundraising stock-take at The Warehouse. There are nowhere near enough stock-takers, an overwhelming diversity of stock, and the stock is all over the show.

There are complications in any inventory. Products or species must be classified, which can quickly become a nightmare on the front line. What should be done with the two Black & Decker blue orbital sanders? One is with a dustbag attachment and one is without? And what about the dustbag attachment sold separately? Is this a case of variation in a single product, or are these three different products? Three tally marks under one product heading, or one tally mark under three product headings?

These kinds of questions get even more complicated in a biodiversity stock-take where appearances of individuals in a species can vary far beyond the variation found in Black & Decker orbital sanders. Height, hair colour, shape and skin colour all vary in humans. Dramatic differences in appearances can also occur in species along gender lines, or by age, or by their environment. Consider the peacock and the pea-hen, the tadpole and the frog, and the taupata (Coprosma repens) on windy and sheltered banks. How can our stock-takers know if and when the new-to-science crust on the rock will turn into a fleshy seaweed?

In order to classify species taxonomists need to study biodiversity to get a sense of life cycles, population variability, gender differences, reproductive strategies, and environmental responses. This taxonomy is what really slows the biodiversity stock-take down, but this is also what truly reveals the nature of our neighbours. Having a list of latin words is only useful if the latin translates into useful logical descriptions of discrete species.

We need to know our neighbours in order to know whether they are changing, and in order to understand our world. Speeding up the biodiversity stock-take is crucial. We need more taxonomists, more funding and more of an appreciation for scientists collecting basic species information.

What better time than now, the International Year of Biodiversity, to step up to the challenge.

 

Fiona Hodge gets excited by all things green and growing. She has battled giant waves to collect seaweed hybrids, climbed mountains for alpine flowers, and braved persistent rain in pursuit of botanical data from the depths of New Zealand's temperate rainforests.

 

Her blog will showcase some of the many charms and delights of The Silent Majority: the prolific collection of plants, seaweeds, lichens, slime moulds and other fascinating non-vocals that quietly share our world.

 

The blog is also a tribute to the secret-hunters: the scientists who reveal the stories of those who cannot speak.

 

The Silent Majority Entries

Comments [5]

Phil
14 Oct 2010 06:14p.m.

@V: go and find out about ecosystem services, drug discovery, zoonoses, pollination ecology, honey production, fermentation, cheese manufacture, microbiology, plant breeding, crop landrace diversity, plant parasites, animal parasites, mycorrhizae, wood rot fungi, and 101 other topics where biodiversity directly affects your economic well-being, food supply, or health, and then come back and explain to Fiona why hers isn't a real job.

Fiona Hodge
19 Jun 2010 08:45a.m.

"Native" and "Indigenous" both mean that a species naturally occurs in the region. "Endemic" is more specific, describing native/indigenous species that are only found in the region. Most of our "native" and "indigenous" species are also "endemic", as they are only found in New Zealand (e.g. weta, kiwi, kowhai). By comparison the giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) is native to New Zealand but found in Australia, South America and South Africa so not endemic.

Hugo
19 Jun 2010 04:46a.m.

It seems like old V here should be classified as a sub-species of a dustbag attachment.

v
18 Jun 2010 08:58p.m.

Get a real job, Nature will take care of itself, If a tree falls in the forest does it make a sound because no one is around. The NEW UN biodiversity scare mongering that you are espousing 'http://climatequotes.com/2010/06/13/teeb-pushes-fear-and-new-taxes/' is not an accident YOU are part of the unquestioning sheep.. Where do you think all the money goes, Why has Al-Gore cut his losses on Carbon Credit frauds and now is focused on this new scam A TAX on LIFE. 'let it be'

Joanna
18 Jun 2010 02:18p.m.

This is a really great piece of writing, Fiona. Thoroughly enjoyable, and educational too (for the likes of me!). I've just spend a wonderful morning at the new Zealandia exhibition. Can you sometime explain the difference between 'native', 'indigenous' and 'endemic'. Thanks, Joanna

Post a comment

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:


3News Video 3News Audio

Blogs