3News » Home

IT and the future of schools

Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:40a.m.
By Ludwig Wendzich
 
What does the future hold for schools? What do students want, as opposed to the IT companies who create the possible futures for schools, or the management teams who choose them?

My mum is currently at ULearn '09 where teachers from all over NZ meet in Christchurch and learn about the plans that IT companies have for NZ schools in the coming years. A couple of years ago I had the privilege of being able to speak at a similar conference about what students wanted from schools in the "21st Century."

At that opportunity I used an extended metaphor that was conjured up by a friend of mine; "Students want cake, stop giving us dry bread when we are so used to getting cake at home!" By that I simply meant that schools offer us textbooks, often black and white and mainly filled with text - when we are used to HD video, "next-generation" games, highly interactive forms of communication (from the simple SMS to Social Networks like Twitter and Facebook) and much more thrilling and engaging activities at home.

Unfortunately the outcome didn't result in much better or more highly engaged students. There was an increase in the amount of media used in class; we got to see a lot more videos, and Youtube started to make an appearance also, but most of these videos were just as stale as the textbooks and worse, some were trying too hard to be cool and failing miserably (even for the 1990s in which they were created!)

Not surprisingly the IT companies pushed the idea of an LMS and today the school of the future is a school that has an LMS. Apparently because students like Facebook they'll like some sort of website that let's them interact with students at their school or ask their teachers questions online or get their homework online or submit assignments online. The problem is that most of these systems are badly designed, technically and from a user experience standpoint, and yet schools are still obsessed with them.

This blog is meant to address what real life can learn from the world wide web which means it will sound odd that I am advocating schools to stop being obsessed with LMS systems.

They are not the future, they are an example of someone seeing one success, Facebook and Youtube, and trying to use it as a model for another purpose. Facebook and Youtube are not successful because they are online or have fancy designs with sprinkles of AJAX goodness, Facebook and Youtube are successful because they are good at what they do.

Schools, focus on teaching. IT companies who are building these learning management systems, stop copying and trying to be fancy. Find out what schools need to be successful at teaching and build that! Unfortunately I think you'll find yourself out of a job.

The cake that schools need to succeed are good teachers, not videos or web applications emulating other successful websites.


We live in a time where technology is busy invading every part of your life, and every bit of that technology is starting to get the ability to communicate with one another.

The internet has been the most influential piece of technology yet, and will continue to change our lives drastically as we come to understand the power of connectivity.

Logged On will look at what principles or ideas succeeded online and how we can apply them to our society; our government and its systems, as well as your private lives.

You needn't be scared of the digital age; instead embrace technology in a way that will make your life easier and safer.

Ludwig.

Previous Logged on entries

comments: 5
Analogue_4Eva
02 Dec 2009 12:02a.m.

Oh no....

IT has invaded schools too now...!!!

Wow - & I thought "my" IT was bad ... look at how B_I_G yours is...!

IT and the future of schools
(do schools HAVE a future - now that their IT has invaded them...

(Are you scared of your IT too?)

Oh - hang on - you mean I-T ... as in information Technologies...
Hey - BUT.!
That's a totally different - IT - from my "IT" ... (U know - that scarey thing - with no - other name... to call ...)

"IT"

Mark
03 Nov 2009 2:01p.m.

Well said Ludwig. my children attend what is considered a forward planning school as far as I.T. goes and yet as an I.T. person I still see that schools and teachers are looking to the I.T. infrastructure developers to tell them where they can head in this field and often being frustrated in the process as they can see that this wont achieve their outcomes. Teachers need to be feeding the information to the developers and get them to build the systems they want and so desperately need.

What of point of presence systems i.e:One teacher adressing multiple schools, interaction in classroom learning on a true global scale?

Schools have Interactive Whiteboards but due to inadequate training or understanding of thier use these are not an asset to the teacher but more like another burden.

Ludwig
09 Oct 2009 3:31p.m.

@Derek; I'm sorry that it sounds like I meant that ULearn would only be trade-show. I should have made it more clear that it's about teachers sharing their knowledge with each other; I know that unconference type events are becoming more common amongst schools in the same community to share teaching skills and I believe that ULearn is a nation-wide type of unconference. In terms of the technology companies that are there; they mainly want to tell you (the teachers) what THEY think schools should be doing with technology, more specifically the technology they've been building and I don't think that works the right way around. My comments here are from an educational conference I was asked to speak at a couple of years ago..........................................@Robbie; That's my point. Education is about teaching and about GOOD teaching. Teaching can be done with or without technology, but without quality teaching, no amount of technology will make any difference.

Robbie Mackay
09 Oct 2009 2:09p.m.

Good call. Wish more people remembered that. One of my best lecturers at uni often used chalk and a black board and made up write our own notes... But he engaged with the students so the technology was irrelevant.

Derek Wenmoth
09 Oct 2009 1:36p.m.

Great post Ludwig - your point is very valid. I particularly agree with your penultimate paragraph about the 'hi-jacking' of technologies for other purposes. Hope your mum had a great time at ULearn09 (http://www.ulearn.org.nz) as that's where I am at the moment. Just wanted to comment on your description of ULearn as a conference where IT companies share their plans for education - while there are IT companies present in the trades show area, the conference is actually about teachers sharing with teachers the inspiring and aspirational ideas for engaging with learners in 21st century schools and classrooms etc. While technology certainly features in this, the focus in primarily on learning, the future and exploring the role of technology in all of this.

Post a comment

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:


3News Video 3News Audio