Thanks Unions - add $34m to Hobbit bill - blog

Print

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:25a.m.

President of the CTU Helen Kelly (NZPA)

President of the CTU Helen Kelly (NZPA)

By Patrick Gower

The union movement has cost the taxpayer $34 million. It's that simple. That's what the Government had to pay out to keep the Hobbit.

The unions have also given the Government room to ram through a law change that will seriously weaken their position - whoops!

The unions were so far off the mark they even caused what were essentially anti-union marches, on Labour Day of all days.

And the unions have written a script that says: "John Key saves the day for New Zealand from the nasty unions". That seriously undermines their credibility - what a shocker. It also strengthens the hand of Key - who the unions have been targeting.

This all adds up to give a new meaning to the word "perverse outcome".

There's been a lot of talk about this Hobbit business.

It’s best to stick to the facts.

There was no problem with The Hobbit until the unions kicked off.

The facts are, that on August 17 the international actor's union threatened to boycott the Hobbit on behalf of the New Zealand actors

That's huge.

And this makes the claims of the New Zealand actors that "we just wanted to get in the room" with Peter Jackson look totally disingenuous and misleading.

The letter shows they wanted far more than that - collective bargaining that would change the industry permanently - and that's not Jackson's role.

Once industrial relations get to the point of a threatened boycott, you can't just sit down and have a chat. Every word, every action matters.

In Jackson's words, the unions had a gun to his head.

And in a scene more reminiscent of Quentin Tarantino than Peter Jackson, Warner Bros turned up with an even bigger gun and put it to New Zealand's head.

Warners said, take your gun away - and give us all your money.

So Warners got the employment change, and some - but not all - the money.

They came down-under for two days work and walked away with up to $34 million.

The Government will offset the marketing costs with $13.4 million. It will also give extra tax breaks of $10 million to each of the movies - another $20 million.

This comes on top of the $60 million the Government was already pumping in - so almost $100 million.

Small beer to keep the $670 million project in New Zealand of course, especially considering the strengthening New Zealand dollar against the Greenback cut profit margins of the film big-time.

But the conspiracy theory advanced by unions that Jackson and Warners set this all up to get some cash out of the government is just ridiculous.

There is just no way to engineer something like this.

And don't forget the Greenback is strengthening all around the world. Warners would have currency hedging systems too.

But because of the union's actions, they were able to get in the door of Premier House and get negotiating and get some of the losses back.

To use the actor's phrase (correctly this time), they let Warner Bros "get in the room". And once in the room, Warners did the business.

John Key, Gerry Brownlee and company have done a good job negotiating against Warners who sources have told me were ruthless in there.

Key and Brownlee would be as unhappy about having to pander to Warner Bros as the next Kiwi.

They just did what was needed to keep the movies here.

They've tacked on some good spin-offs for New Zealand on the tourism front.

And I don't think any of them lost any sleep about getting to change employment law to benefit the boss. It would have been tempting to take that outside the film industry, but they've managed to resist that.

Hardly anyone's backing the unions here. Labour leader Phil Goff backed the conspiracy theory yesterday, saying they'd walked into a trap. He probably had no choice: the unions are Labour's main income stream. Labour hasn't laid a hit on National through this whole saga.

The Actor's union boss Simon Whipp has now headed back to Australia.

He showed his true colours in my story on Tuesday night, when he told my colleague Amanda Gillies he didn't care if the film was made in New Zealand.

Council of Trade Unions boss Helen Kelly got it wrong too. In my opinion, a good modern union leader could have seen where this was headed when she got involved, and thought about the wider work-force and New Zealand industry.

A good modern leader could have settled this down. But she poured petrol on the fire. The unions attacked Sir Peter Jackson - that was never going to work.

The unions have been wanting to rip into John Key. They've openly said that. They opened up at him at the National Party conference over the 90-day fire-at-will law.

But, as I noted at the time there were no workers there - just activists.

The 90-day bill issue hasn't taken off much from there since - unions admit that.

The unions and the left have been looking for something to nail Key with, and make them relevant again. A grassroots union revival like what happened with John Howard's "work choices" policy in Australia.

They got so desperate, that they got star-struck when the actors’ issue came along. They thought it could launch unions back into the spotlight via their popular actor friends.

But all they've done is make their target, Key, even more popular.

It was a flop.

The best scripts are simple.

And this one says: John Key winner, Unions losers.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

3/06/2011 1:31:07 p.m.

mist wrote:

Fighting the 90day fire-at-will will *never* get the vote of an employer or supervisor who has got stuck with a slack worker.

8/03/2011 9:40:24 p.m.

Jeff wrote:

Hey, Patrick. I wonder if, since the news came out a couple of months ago that Jackson knew that the union had withdrawn the blacklist, but hid that in order to keep some union-bashing going, you have changed your opinion?

Your opinion is very black and white, and lacks depth; I was a little surprised to read it, given your position as a member of the Press Gallery. An real investigation into the motives of the CTU would have helped - a CTU effort to get some truth out there, and to manage through and protect a very small NZ union that had bitten off more than it could chew. To be frank, I see some dignity and loyalty in that effort.

Instead, in the so-called Hobbit saga, we saw a replay of the 'Outrageous Fortune" scrap of a couple of years ago - the efforts of some actors to negotiate saw the same gameplan - the producers threatening to withdraw, winding up all the non-union staff, and forcing a withdrawal.
A victory for wealthy film producers, another lesson to a bunch of workers to not rock the boat, and so it goes....

Your tabloid-style gloating and finger-pointing adds little light to the situation.

2/03/2011 1:53:02 p.m.

Andrea wrote:

How is it that Warner are bullies & came down to basically throw their weight around & the union ends up being the bad guy? Let's get some perspective here: NZ actors were being underpaid & John Key gave them the finger & kissed Warner's butt. End of story. Nice PM we have huh?

19/11/2010 6:04:21 p.m.

Jum wrote:

Patrick Gower 'previously a political and investigative reporter for the New Zealand Herald.' oxymoron m'dear. Herald/political investigative - nah. Never happened. Consider the crap that was called an investigative piece on Key. We still haven't got to the bottom of that creature. With the Herald as political investigator? Like I said oxy, with the accent on moron. John 'we would love to see wages drop' Key is loving that the public of New Zealand see him as some sort of financial saviour. They forget a few things. He favoured a foreign film company over NZers and used that situation to divide New Zealanders and attack the unions. He cost New Zealanders unnecessary charges because of his hatred of people in unions. If he was any sort of patriotic New Zealander he would have supported all the actors and brokered a deal which helped New Zealanders. He has no loyalty. He got into government because NZers thought he knew about money. But he didn't warn us about the incoming financial cyclone. It could well have been because he wanted us to go through a bad depression in order to 'lower the wages', make workers cheap, desperate labour - before NAct got in workers had some equal say in their working pay and conditions - Key and Co hated that.

7/11/2010 6:45:51 p.m.

Mark wrote:

@ Nora Write me a list of MP’s that are not manipulators and I will relabelled it for you as those that manipulate the best. @ Andrew Do you think the government would have had to offer extra incentives if the Unions had kept totally out of it? The government offered the extra money, but the Unions also have a lot of the responsibility for this being done. What exactly was in the law change that will result in the “removing job security and conditions from NZ workers”, makes you think it was “idiotic” and makes you think that “frankly I'd be happy for any employment (sorry, "service") contract like that to go to the third world where it belongs”? As far as I could see it was just clarifying that if you sign up as a contractor, or an employee, you are then treated as contractor, or an employee.

2/11/2010 8:44:41 p.m.

Frank wrote:

'Nora' take some medication and lie down for a bit, you don't sound well.

2/11/2010 2:50:23 p.m.

Nora wrote:

Dont the New Zealand public realise what John Key is doing.. its called manipulation.

Get one of your ministers to suggest Mining on taboo or conservation land... hear the public react... become the hero by suggesting an alternative.... little did the public know though that the alternative was where they planned to mine in the first place.

Get one of your ministers to suggest that overseas travel now be hidden from public scrutiny and then you yourself go... oh well we would release those figures anyway.

This is New Zealand being "plyed" by a master manipulator.

I wouldnt believe a single word that came out of this little manipulators mouth.

There is always an agenda with John Key.

But by getting His ministers to suggest repugnant things to the NZ public and then swooping in to save the day all the time.. he looks like a saint.

Thats what they say the Antichrist will be like.. lips and words as sweet as candy.

But a heart full of loathing and hatred.

And I am not even christian, but John Key is most certainly the closest I have ever come to seeing the Anti Christ.

7 days summed up John Key quite nicely.. hes a man that loves to get on his knees for american business interests and Gob it all up for them.. making sure that they are satisfied while we get screwed.

1/11/2010 4:17:00 p.m.

Andrew wrote:

hey Frances,
In case you didn't know it, poorly-worded self-selecting internet polls are basically only good for novelty napkins.

I think keeping the Hobbit in NZ is a Good Thing (tm). I don't believe that blaming the unions because the government is paying for around a fifth of the movie production costs (in tax breaks, grants and co-advertising) is a Good Thing (tm).

The entire concept of the current "stand on your own two feet" government subsidising a business venture is surreal although possibly reasonable (if a clear and accurate cost-benefit analysis were publicised) - government by focus group is generally a Bad Thing (tm).

I certainly don't agree that keeping a multinational conglomeration operating in NZ by removing job security and conditions from NZ workers is a Good Thing.

New Zealand should succeed by being the best, not by being the cheapest and most craven. Rather than the embarrassing spectacle of our Prime Minister prostrating himself before the corporate calf and throwing in idiotic eomployment law changes for good measure, frankly I'd be happy for any employment (sorry, "service") contract like that to go to the third world where it belongs.

1/11/2010 4:10:52 p.m.

Andrew wrote:

hey Frances,
I think keeping the Hobbit in NZ is a Good Thing (tm). I don't believe that blaming the unions because the government is paying for around a fifth of the movie production costs (in tax breaks, grants and co-advertising) is necessarily a Good Thing (tm), although it might be if a clear and accurate cost-benefit analysis were publicised. I don't agree that keeping a multinational operating in NZ by removing job security and conditions from NZ workers is a Good Thing.

New Zealand should succeed by being the best, not by being the cheapest and most craven. Rather than the embarrassing spectacle of our Prime Minister prostrating himself before the corporate calf and throwing in idiotic eomployment law changes for good measure, frankly I'd be happy for any employment (sorry, "service") contract like that to go to the third world where it belongs.

1/11/2010 2:42:03 p.m.

Frances wrote:

'Grant' the only line in your reply that makes sense is the 'I have no idea' one. That sums you, the left and the Unions up. Look at the latest poll on the NZ Herald site - 80% of normal thinking kiwis believe that keeping the Hobbit is a good thing. Thanks to John Key we have just done that. Get a life you moron.

Patrick Gower's Entries

Previous123Next