Thermography 'no substitute' for mammography

Print

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 6:21p.m.

By Jenny Suo

Health groups are warning women to stay away from a diagnostic tool called thermography, which is sometimes used to screen for breast cancer.

The health groups say there's insufficient evidence to show that it works.

Thermography records heat distribution to form an image and has been sold as a tool for early detection of breast cancer.

Josie Taylor thought her life had changed forever when she had her breasts checked at a thermography clinic.

She had three sleepless nights before she had a mammogram – surprisingly, it came back clear.

Ms Taylor was lucky - she feared she was developing cancer when she wasn't.

But its patients the other way around that have doctors concerned.

"The harm of thermography is reassuring women they're fine when they're not," says breast surgeon Belinda Scott.

"For me, it's not a happening thing. It just doesn't work."

The main appeal of thermograms is they're non-invasive. Patients just have a picture taken.

But key health groups including the Ministry of Health don't support their use, saying there's insufficient evidence that thermography is trustworthy.

A thermography specialist disagrees.

"I've been doing thermal imaging in this country for eight years," says Mike Godfrey. "I established the network, I've done almost 3000 thermograms. I've missed one."

Mr Godfrey says he's not promoting thermography as an alternative to mammography, instead they should be used alongside each other - something that Ms Taylor doesn't feel was made clear to her.

"I think there needs to be more information out there about this, I've found out since then it's not necessarily a breast screening device at all."

She is relying on mammography in future - a technique that gets the full support of those health groups concerned about thermography.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments

07 Oct 2010 04:28a.m.

Ron wrote:

something to ponder,,, it is proven that mammograms cause cancer. Could mammograms be feeding a part of the cancer industry? Just one more thing,,,the "search for the cure" is a multi-billion dollar industry. As long as the "search" brings in billions,,,will true cures for cancer ever really be allowed. One more thing,,,thermography does NOT cause cancer but can find it before mammography.

29 Sep 2010 11:24a.m.

A. Mostovoy wrote:

Breast thermography is not a stand-alone diagnostic test, it is however an imaging procedure used to determine risk of developing breast cancer. Breast thermography is a great option for women of all ages and shapes including younger women who may have dense breast tissue, women with fibrocystic breasts, and even women with implants. Breast Thermography provides you valuable baseline information which can help evaluate future breast health and potential risk factors. Thermography is one of the best early warning systems available today.

24 Sep 2010 11:36a.m.

Cynthia Simmons wrote:

People need o understand the difference between the 2 - Mammogram is an XRAY which looks for a MASS a LUMP; a 1 cm lump may take as long as 8 years to develop. Thermography is an early RISK assesment looking for heat patterns that could early on be associated with the beginnings of cancerous cells developing into a tumor. One does not replace the other.

23 Sep 2010 10:54p.m.

Linda wrote:

I completely disagree with Ms Taylor. Before beginning with thermography we were given all the information regarding it including that it should be used alongside mammography. However I doubt that I will ever have a mammogram again because the evidence is out there that it causes cancer. Don't expect to here that from your doctor though. Do the research yourself and think for your yourself.

23 Sep 2010 07:14p.m.

Gary wrote:

After a GP visit, a mamogram, and an ultrasound all which proved clear, My wife had a thermography which Mike Godfrey raised concern about, saying it may be cancer. She eventually had a biopsy which proved she had breast cancer.
After 3 months of waiting and CLEAR "mainstream" tests she finally had a breast removed becuase of breast cancer.
I think that mainstream diagonstics are not perfect and that alternative treatments should be condisered along side these and not dismissed out of hand.
The doctors get it wrong too!
I wonder how much smaller the cancer would have been if it was detected 3 months earlier.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)