• Full Story

US deficit could spark another crisis

Print

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 8:54a.m.

President Barack Obama is considering all options to create jobs, including another stimulus package

President Barack Obama is considering all options to create jobs, including another stimulus package

The federal budget deficit has surged to an all-time high of $US1.42 trillion as the recession caused tax revenues to plunge while the government was spending massive amounts to stabilise the financial system and jump-start the economy.
 
How much is US$1.42 trillion?

It's more than the total national debt for the first 200 years of the Republic, more than the entire economy of India, almost as much as Canada's, and more than US$4,700 for every man, woman and child in the United States.

The federal budget deficit for 2009 is more than three times the most red ink ever amassed in a single year.

And, some economists warn, unless the government makes hard decisions to cut spending or raise taxes, it could be the seeds of another economic crisis.

Treasury figures released Friday showed that the government spent US$46.6 billion more in September than it took in, a month that normally records a surplus. That boosted the shortfall for the full fiscal year ending Sept. 30 to US$1.42 trillion. The previous year's deficit was US$459 billion.

As a percentage of US economic output, it's the biggest deficit since World War II.
 
President Barack Obama is considering all options to create jobs, including another stimulus package, while trying to pull the economy out of a deep recession and deal with the record deficit, White House advisers said Sunday.
 
With more than half of the $US787 billion recovery package yet to be spent, Obama aides said the administration is not ready to commit to additional measures.
 
"Everything is on the table," senior adviser Valerie Jarrett said.
 
"You've got this huge national deficit and we've got to do what we can to bring that down. At the same time, it's important to stimulate the economy," Jarrett said. "Let's wait and see. Let's let the recovery bill do its job."
 
Unemployment stands at 9.8 percent, with more than 4 million jobs lost this year. The deficit has reached $US1.4 trillion and the national debt $US11.9 trillion.
 
Adviser David Axelrod cited progress on reviving the economy, with expectations for growth in the third quarter this year.
 
But he warned that the government should not make the mistake of ending its recovery initiatives too early at the risk of sending the economy back into recession.
 
"That doesn't mean that we don't look to the mid- and long-term for deficit reduction," Axelrod said. "We have a stimulus program in place, an economic recovery program in place, that is not even 50 percent through. We have to see that through.
 
And we'll see what other measures we need to take."
 
In appearances on the Sunday news programs, the advisers criticised those Wall Street firms that are paying huge amounts in compensation and benefits after accepting taxpayer assistance. Goldman Sachs, for example, has said it has set aside $US16.7 billion for compensation so far this year, more than $US500,000 per employee. Citigroup is paying $US5.3 billion in bonuses to its employees and Bank of America $US3.3 billion.
 
"I think the American people have a right to be frustrated and angry," said Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff.
 
Emanuel and the chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., said the compensation issue comes as banks and other financial institutions oppose efforts by the president and Congress to put in place regulations designed to prevent the kind of financial meltdown that began last year.
 
"They have a responsibility to the whole system," Emanuel said. "And it starts with not fighting the financial regulatory system and the reforms that are necessary to protect consumers, homeowners and others."
 
Dodd criticised banks for failing to make more credit available to small businesses and others.
 
"When you see these bonuses being paid out, it's a source of outrage in the country, and it should be. What are these people thinking about at these companies?" he said.
 
Dodd said he hopes that Kenneth Feinberg, the Treasury Department's point man on compensation, can take action that will lead the firms to reconsider their compensation plans.
 
Jarrett and Dodd appeared on NBC's "Meet the Press," Axelrod on ABC's "This Week" and Emanuel on CNN's "State of the Union."
 
AP
Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

19 Oct 2009 12:27p.m.

Baker wrote:

Well if they stopped spending money on bombs then they wouldn't have this problem. 1 huge bomb can cost up to 5 million dollars to make including labour and materials, if you make a hundred of them, that's 500 million. It always amazes me when people say the US has a trillion dollar deficit and an 11.9 trillion dollar debt. How bout stop spending money on killing people and start spending it on saving people. A bomb never saved anyone, you can feed an entire nation with 5 million dollars, you can't feed anyone with a bomb. And for you smart arses out there, you might say that the nuclear bombs that the US dropped on Japan saved China, well it did, but it killed more then 100,000 Japanese people and completely destroyed to cities. Bombs are expensive and equal nothing but death, so why does the US and other big countries spend so much on them and on weapons that kill, because their dumb arses