Unconventional Cathedral design revealed

Print

Unconventional Cathedral design revealed

3News NZ

The design has been presented by Japanese architect Shigeru Ban

The design has been presented by Japanese architect Shigeru Ban

By Kim Choe

Christchurch leaders have revealed the unconventional design they want to use for the city's temporary Cathedral and it is made out of cardboard.

They hope to have it built by the first anniversary of this year’s major earthquake.

The design has been presented by Japanese architect Shigeru Ban, who is known for building temporary structures after natural disasters.

A church he built in Kobe, Japan, after the 1995 earthquake served the Catholic community there for eleven years.

Christchurch's temporary Cathedral would be built from a combination of reinforced, waterproofed cardboard and shipping containers. This would allow it to be easily relocated or recycled once the permanent church is completed.

Mr Ban's design, which he hopes to build with the help of local students, has got church and city leaders excited.

Reverend Peter Beck, the ChristChurch Cathedral dean, says the design has a nice feel about it.

“It's almost tent-like, and I like the idea of pitching our tent,” says Mr Beck. “It's a very Christian concept actually; pitching our tent in the middle of the city. It's almost got a marae essence about it too.”

Christchurch mayor Bob Parker says the design is a physical way of showing hope.

“It could be a multi-purpose space too, so that it might actually help us with orchestras, choirs, and other things.”

Mr Ban says although they are not meant to be permanent, his cardboard designs are built to last.

“Even the building made in paper can be permanent, as long as people love it.”

The church and the council are still searching for a suitable location for the temporary church.

At an estimated cost of $4 million, even cardboard does not come cheap.

3 News

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

1/08/2011 9:18:25 a.m.

Jimmy wrote:

So why would someone put $4 mil in a church that will not have a permanent character when those money can go elsewhere on a priority basis. The Catherdral was damaged 5 months ago, people have been praying since, whay we have tp pay for tis now? Why people won't be asked if they want to do that, or use the money in a wiser manner? A easy way of voting using cell phones on the subject of $4 million temporary cathedral is not hard to do, and is not expensive either. Come on, be reasonable...you want morer people leave Chch because they had enough from the local leaders as well?

31/07/2011 9:00:32 p.m.

jo harvey wrote:

YEAH what???? 4 mill??? god is everey where and our dean shuld know that this money shuld be fixing houses and roads first so we can live. As a town with gods name its important to have our Cathedral and i want to see it rebuild after our lives and homes are safe!!!

31/07/2011 6:40:24 p.m.

Stephen Berry wrote:

What? $4 million for a temporary church? Who is paying for this?