VIDEO: Students protest Voluntary Student Membership Bill

Print

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 3:19p.m.

More than 300 students have blockaded the doors

More than 300 students have blockaded the doors

By Lloyd Burr

Student protests are not usually civil or quiet affairs but today, student protests against ACT’s voluntary student membership bill at Auckland, Waikato and Otago universities were silent.

Students taped their mouths shut and marched with signs in silence to show the Government that the student voice will be lost if the bill becomes law.

The Education (Freedom of Association) Amendment Bill, which has enough parliamentary support to pass on Wednesday, makes membership of students’ associations voluntary and creates an opt-in membership system rather than the current opt-out system.

In all New Zealand universities, apart from Auckland, membership of students’ associations is automatic and students have membership fees added to their student loans.

ACT’s bill will mean that membership is not automatic and students will have to join the associations on their own accord.

Students’ associations are vehemently against the idea because it means their membership numbers, and their income, will drop.

The national body for students, the New Zealand Union of Students’ Association (NZUSA), organised ‘silent sit-in’ protests at Auckland, Waikato and Otago universities today.

The protests are part of the last-minute bid to convince the National Party not to support the bill, which NZUSA says will “undermine independent representation on campus”.

NZUSA co-president Max Hardy says voluntary student membership is “one of the biggest threats to a strong independent student voice for many years”.

“It will splinter and undermine the collective voice and contribution of students to the tertiary community.

“National still has an opportunity to drop its support for this extreme and inflexible Bill and instead work with students on fairer alternatives for improving student services and representation, rather than gutting them,” Mr Hardy says.

The bill, drafted by ACT MP Roger Douglas but now in Heather Roy’s name, was drawn from the ballot in 2009.

If it passes this week, it will come into force next year.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

30 Sep 2011 05:43p.m.

Steven Law wrote:

Being a student who doesnt use any of these services but have to pay the fees and watch the idiot student unions waste my money... If all the protesting students want to protest to stay members then whats the problem? Market yourselves and because you think you "represent all students" then you wont have any problem getting members? Yeah Right. Students dont agree with compulsory membership.

27 Sep 2011 07:14a.m.

trinity wrote:

When I was In Rotorua most of the people who ran the student association were paid over $30,000 a year one was even on a wage of over $40,000 . Student have to be aware of where the money they paye to be a member goes. It should not be on the wages to run the assoc

26 Sep 2011 11:41p.m.

consciousness wrote:

if i were a police officer,i would be very careful about my actions because when this mass awakening happens and the de facto court becomes a court of law,the police will be held accountable for every injustice they cause.

26 Sep 2011 09:49p.m.

Concerned student wrote:

"Unconcerned Student" and "Sam" have no idea what they're talking about or why people are protesting and that is exactly why we need to stop support for this piece of legislation. Because students don't realise how important their unions are. If this goes ahead, then students will not have their say in many different aspects of their education which, in my opinion, takes away the democracy and a dictatorship is empowered. Students take one look at the dollar signs and forget that without that payment, they could end up paying a much higher price for their education (quite literally).

26 Sep 2011 09:49p.m.

Dan wrote:

I just went along because IT WAS EXITING... A CHANGE!

26 Sep 2011 09:20p.m.

Very Concerned Student wrote:

The fact is not that most students want the student unions benefits OR that they don't want them. The reality is the vast vast vast majority of students don't care at all or are totally ignorant of the issue. They have no idea how much they will lose if this goes through, not just the benefits, but their democratic rights. A democracy in which the voter doesn't care, and policy is dictated by minor interests (ACT on Campus) is a dictatorship.

26 Sep 2011 09:10p.m.

Larry Haist wrote:

Having worked under Mc Cutcheon at a different university, I say, "Send him on his way." Students have more guts, and I hope more effect, than university staff have had. Good on Auckland students.

26 Sep 2011 08:49p.m.

Jason Powers wrote:

just because you dont know what goes on in the AUSA dosnt mean that it doesnt effect you, many decisions that they make effect your life as a student, it is not all about parties and drinking games

26 Sep 2011 07:28p.m.

dianne wrote:

act sucks and so does McCuthen power to the students'terrible national radio reorrting on this as the interviewer asked only if there was any violence at 5 pm news- what is she expecting, an American style protest with vicious cops or what- only indepth report was this channel 3 video on Google

26 Sep 2011 06:33p.m.

Unconcerned Student wrote:

The student unions that are protesting are not doing this in my name. I can't wait to stop paying fees (things are really tight as a student) to prop up services that the majority of students don't want or use. The funny thing is that if support for the unions is as high as the protesters claim, they wouldn't be worrying about voluntary membership.