Vatican: Savile's papal honor cannot be removed

Print

Savile's papal honor cannot be removed

3News NZ

File photograph shows disgraced British entertainer Jimmy Savile arriving at the unveiling of a new monument, commemorating the fighter pilots who fought in the Battle of Britain, in London (Reuters)

File photograph shows disgraced British entertainer Jimmy Savile arriving at the unveiling of a new monument, commemorating the fighter pilots who fought in the Battle of Britain, in London (Reuters)

By Sylvia Hui

The Vatican said Saturday it never would have given Jimmy Savile his papal knighthood had it known of allegations the British TV star was a child sex predator, but that it can't rescind the honour now that he has died.

The Catholic Church of England wrote to the Holy See last week, asking it to consider whether it could posthumously remove the honour awarded to Savile because of the many recent child sex abuse allegations against him. Savile, a much-loved BBC children's television host, died last year at age 84.

The church said its leader, Archbishop of Westminster Vincent Nichols, made the request because the "deep distress" of his alleged victims and in light of public concerns about his name remaining on the papal honours lists.

But the Rev. Federico Lombardi, the Vatican's spokesman, told The Associated Press it couldn't rescind the knighthood awarded to Savile because there simply is no permanent register from which to strike it. The names of people who receive the knighthood don't appear in the Holy See's yearbook and that the honour dies with the individual, Lombardi said.

He also said Savile never would have received the honour had allegations about his behaviour been known, and Lombardi stressed the Vatican's firm condemnation of any type of sexual abuse against children.

Savile was made a Knight Commander of St. Gregory the Great by Pope John Paul II in 1990 for his charity work. He was also knighted by Queen Elizabeth II for his services to charity and entertainment.

But police now believe Savile to be one of the most prolific sex offenders in Britain in recent history, with a "staggering number" of people reporting abuses by him after his death.

Some 300 potential victims have come forward with abuse allegations, police said. Most of them say they were abused by Savile, but some say they were abused by other people, Metropolitan Police said Friday.

The popular TV presenter's family spoke out Saturday about its shock over the recent revelations.

"These things we knew absolutely nothing at all about until these revelations have come out now," Savile's nephew, Roger Foster, told the BBC. "It's just so unexpected, so totally, at first, unbelievable."

British police said they also have received many reports of past, unrelated child sex abuse cases since the scandal surrounding Savile came to light.

One such case was resolved in British courts on Friday.

Reginald Davies, a 78-year-old retiree, was convicted of 13 offenses against four girls, including the rape of one under the age of 12, and sentenced to 11 years in prison.

The crimes took place between 1949 and 1973, and police said the case appeared to involve the oldest criminal charges ever heard in a British court. Davies had moved to Australia, but two of his victims confronted him and reported him to police while vacationing there in 2008.

AP

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

29/10/2012 10:21:42 a.m.

Kevin wrote:

Because it's a popular topic, that's why it is on the news. People loves to see scandal exposed, even if the person accused is already R.I.P.. "It is in the nature of the law enforcements to desecrate the reputation of the deceased"

28/10/2012 5:26:48 p.m.

bukster wrote:

K is quite right, he was never convicted or even charged. Certain crimes seen to have such a large 'yuck' factor that people react on instinct and presume guilt the moment and accusation is made. I've never even heard of Savile. He's some sort of British TV host. Why is the New Zealand media even running this story?

28/10/2012 3:21:48 p.m.

k wrote:

I will never understand our system which on one hand says you are innocent until proven guilty but in actual fact pretty much finds you guilty as soon as allegation are levelled at you.