Victim's sons will 'never forgive' teen killer

Print

Fri, 23 Jul 2010 1:20p.m.

Tonia Bennett will serve 11 years and 6 months for murder and arson (NZPA)

Tonia Bennett will serve 11 years and 6 months for murder and arson (NZPA)

The sons of a woman killed in an arson attack have told a court they will never forgive her teenage killer.

Tonia Bennet, 18, snuck into Lynette Chapman’s Pukekohe home in January 2009 and lit a fire under a stairwell.

Ms Chapman, a 49-year-old mother of three, was trapped upstairs as flames engulfed the house.

Bennett was angry after her relationship with one of Ms Chapman’s sons ended. Today she was sentenced to the mandatory life imprisonment but Justice Geoffrey Venning imposed a non-parole period of at least 11 years and six months for Ms Chapman’s murder.

"Your offending on the night was stupid and had a tragic result but was committed in the context of your very troubled personal circumstances," he told Bennett.

Spekaing outside court, Detective Senior Sergeant Dave Glossop said the sons of Ms Chapman have been left devastated by her death.

“They see today as an end to the saga and want to move on with their lives,” he said.

“That’s all they want to say and would like to be left alone now to deal with their grief.”

Brad Chapman, the 19-year-old who had dated Bennett, said in his victim impact statement his mum was attacked without warning or explanation.

Another teenager, a 19-year-old male, was jailed for two years after admitting one charge of manslaughter and two of arson. He was told he could apply for home detention if a suitable house could be found. His name suppression continued today.

Bennett also admitted two counts of arson and was jailed for six years on each charge, to be served concurrently.

3 News / Radio LIVE

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

24 Jul 2010 12:53p.m.

Matlock wrote:

This teen’s conviction should be reduced to manslaughter because the state needs to also accept fault for failing to provide the following:

1.Failing to protect the said teen from abuse at an early age.
2.Failing to provide the said teen adequate psychological support as soon as she was taken into care by the state.

Prolong psychological abuse unchecked develops into a full blown illness where normal societal challenges become blurred and emotions lose all sense of moral etiquette. Case in point this teen is a very disturb individual.

It can be argued that the convicted teen (Perpetrator 1) was pushed (In the form of negligence by the state, Perpetrator 2) to commit the crime. The innocence therefore falls on the convicted teen as she did not receive proper psychological treatment by the state when in the states care.

The states duty is to protect its citizen, civil servants from harm yet an innocent teen while in the states care, a ‘ticking time bomb’ failed to be deactivated psychologically nor detected; onus therefore is dual in nature.

My heart goes out to the son's who lost their mum and should consider filing a case against the state for negligence. Retributive punishment in the form of compensation for loses is a necessary condition for the case.

The convicted teen’s sentence therefore should be downgraded from murder to manslaughter and ordered to receive psychological therapy including restorative justice practices as a prerequisite to returning to normal society.

24 Jul 2010 04:47a.m.

MrMan wrote:

This is way your never trust any women from New Zealand all NZ women are crazy... its a known fact. sorry if you disagree but your crazy to.

23 Jul 2010 04:24p.m.

ivan wrote:

give for her a minimum of 20 years her children will now have to suffer because of her