Voluntary Student Membership bill passes

Print

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 8:48p.m.

Students protest outside Parliament

Students protest outside Parliament

By Lloyd Burr

The bill that makes student association membership voluntary has passed its third reading in Parliament tonight despite a last-ditch bid by protesters to convince National to withdrawal its support.

Students from around the country arrived at Parliament this afternoon for a final protest against ACT’s Education (Freedom of Association) Amendment Bill.

But the protest had no effect and the bill passed with support from National, ACT and United Future.

The woman behind the bill, ACT’s Heather Roy, says students around New Zealand are “free at last”.

“Parliament’s gift to students tonight is freedom of association. Please be sure to use it wisely.

“My intention was never to destroy students’ associations, but to give students free choice of belonging or not.  I hope that associations will put as much effort into planning for the future as they have put into planning their protests,” Ms Roy says.

National Party MP Michael Woodhouse, who was speaking to the bill for the first time, was passionately in favour of the bill despite, he says, reports from Labour and the New Zealand Union of Students’ Associations (NZUSA) that he may be against it.

“There isn’t a hop in Hades of me crossing the floor and voting for this bill. I support this bill completely – no whipping, no shoehorning into voting for it,” he says.

“I support this bill and no amount of clever video editing by Labour apparatchiks or ranty press releases from NZUSA will change that.”

Earlier today, MPs from Labour, the Green Party, Mana and the Maori Party, who voted against the bill, joined students on the steps of Parliament in protest.

Click on the video tab to watch extended footage from the protest

New Zealand Union of Students’ Associations (NZUSA) co-president David Do brought 98 balloons along to the protest to signify the 98 percent of select committee submissions that were against the bill.

He says only two percent of submissions were in favour of ACT’s proposal.

In all New Zealand universities, apart from Auckland, membership of student associations is automatic and students have membership fees added to their student loans.

The bill means membership will not be automatic and students will have to join the associations on their own accord.

Associations around the country have been vehemently against the idea because it means their membership numbers, and their income, will drop.

Fellow NZUSA co-president Max Hardy says voluntary student membership is “one of the biggest threats to a strong independent student voice for many years”.

“It will splinter and undermine the collective voice and contribution of students to the tertiary community.

“National still has an opportunity to drop its support for this extreme and inflexible Bill and instead work with students on fairer alternatives for improving student services and representation, rather than gutting them,” Mr Hardy says.

The bill, drafted by ACT MP Roger Douglas but now in Heather Roy’s name, was drawn from the ballot in 2009 and will come into force next year.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

19 Oct 2011 04:24p.m.

cherie wrote:

Amazing to see something as simple as this be turned around on its ear to show right. I vote for freedom to choose wherever,whenever it pleases me.

13 Oct 2011 10:08a.m.

Alex wrote:

@Cherie: All you've done is attack my example of the principle in action (homeowners associations), rather than whether or not the principle that communities should be able to set rules for themselves is a good one.

11 Oct 2011 03:38p.m.

cherie wrote:

No thats not right Alex. What you are saying is if you dont like it move city and that is not fair. Moving house is a bit different in a city but moving citys is unfair. We here in little old NZ do not have three uni's in each city

11 Oct 2011 12:31p.m.

Alex wrote:

@Cherie - that is exactly what I'm saying. If you don't want to be part of a students' association, don't go to that uni.

11 Oct 2011 09:34a.m.

cherie wrote:

No Alex there are freedoms. If you dont want to pay a neighbourhood assoc charge then you moved out and live somewhere else in your area. The old uni way was different in that if you didnt want to join and there was no other option in your area then you HAD to join. That is not freedom. If the assoc is good for students they will stay with it, surely, lets face it uni students know everything

05 Oct 2011 11:37p.m.

Alex wrote:

(This is the second Alex, not the first one) VSM has nothing to do with freedom and everything to do with dismantling organisations that might have (even the smallest) chance of resisting changes which will negatively affect everyone. The 'freedom' argument isn't a particularly honest one - there are all sorts of other areas in our lives where we can't just do what we want. In fact, sometimes we are compelled to join organisations just for living in a particular area - like neighbourhood associations, to which you are compelled to pay a fee merely for living in that neighbourhood *because the residents have decided that people who come to live in their community must abide by that rule.* Becoming a member of a students' association is no different, except that the interests of students are contrary to those of people in power (unlike neighbourhood associations). It is important to understand this in the context of an economic system which *requires* the accumulation of capital to survive - it simply *has* to dismantle barriers to that accumulation, or it will die, and with it the privilege of its beneficiaries who defend it. Resistance to reduction in state spending is one of these barriers - if you can stop that spending (and shift that wealth/spending from the public to private sector), that is one way to increase the accumulation of capital.

30 Sep 2011 07:55a.m.

Brad wrote:

Alex, so - seriously - what important services are being taken away?

From what little detail I have seen in the media, I am struggling to understand the student hysteria on this issue. Non-compulsory union membership seems to be working fine for Auckland University. The only reason why I would see this being an issue for the unions is they are just losing their key revenue stream. If the unions are able to offer evidence of why you should join and the great services that a member will receive, continuing membership shouldnt be a problem. People will pay when they see they are getting a benefit from membership.

29 Sep 2011 12:11p.m.

ted wrote:

This bill doesn’t take away ‘important services’, the student voice or favour privilege (how is forcing the less privileged to fund services they may not value or want a more fair approach anyway?). Rather it incentivises unions to actually seek the support and consent of their members.

Why do you hate freedom?

Signed - a non privileged uni student fed up with union nonsense

29 Sep 2011 11:53a.m.

Alex wrote:

Freedom from the ability to resist whatever nastiness is coming our way from a second term National government.

29 Sep 2011 11:47a.m.

Scott wrote:

If student support for university associations is strong then there won't be anything to worry about. Students will join if the feel they get value from the services. Students are smart enough to make up their own mind. It's nice to have a choice.