• Full Story

Waihopai 3 happy to be sued by Crown

Print

Wed, 06 Oct 2010 1:59p.m. UPDATED 2.30PM

Teacher Adrian Leason, Dominican friar Peter Murnane, and farmer Sam Land were found not guilty in April

Teacher Adrian Leason, Dominican friar Peter Murnane, and farmer Sam Land were found not guilty in April

The Crown has filed court papers seeking damages from three men acquitted over damage they caused to equipment at the Waihopai spy base near Blenheim in 2008.

Teacher Adrian Leason, Dominican friar Peter Murnane, and farmer Sam Land were found not guilty in April on charges of burglary and wilful damage of the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) base.

They had cut through alarmed electric fences without setting off any audible alarms or getting electrocuted before reaching one of two inflatable domes covering satellite dishes and slashing and deflating it.

The trio used the "claim of right" defence and said they were saving lives in Iraq by disrupting satellite transmissions and were acting for the greater good.

A jury in Wellington District Court found them not guilty.

A spokesman from Attorney-General Chris Finlayson's office said today court papers had been filed in the name of the Attorney-General for the GCSB to recover damages caused by the men's actions. No further comment would be made as the case was before the courts.

After the court case Solicitor-General David Collins ruled out appealing, but said the Crown may consider suing over the damage, estimated to be $1.1 million.

Graham Cameron, a spokesman for the trio, told NZPA today it was always a possibility a civil case would be taken against the men and the Crown had had a long time to consider it.

"Obviously it's regrettable, but it's not unexpected," he said of the decision.

He said the trio had gone through a lengthy process first time around and the decision from the court had been clear cut.

"I have spoken to two of them this morning and they are both prepared to go into this process in the same way they did with the other -- which is to be open and honest about why and what they did."

Green Party MP Keith Locke said pursuing a civil case against the men would be a waste of taxpayer money.

"The GCSB should respect the jury's decision, which found the Waihopai three not guilty," he said.

He said in the original trial the GCSB didn't even put up witnesses to challenge the political arguments the defendants used, and this time around its case would be handicapped by its reluctance to tell a court anything about the secretive Waihopai base.

"Rather than continue to harass the three peace activists, the GCSB should explain to New Zealanders what is really going on at Waihopai."

Mr Cameron said if there were any positives to take from further court action, it was that it would be another chance for them to question the role of the base.

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

28 Feb 2011 10:26a.m.

hapimanaparaakiri wrote:

more on "claim of right" this has a powerful message if you study into common law

06 Oct 2010 10:04p.m.

John Robb wrote:

Yes Brian I agree, but we have not yet set a precedent by raiding the trust funds and locking up the Petrecoviches, Bryerses, Hotchins and Watsons etc. and a myriad of other directors and pettifoggers who have cost us tens and tens of millions more and a lot more misery besides than the deflation of some condom over a dubious spy base in Blenheim. At least these guys, however misguided, thought they had a righteous cause other than that of deception and/or theft.

06 Oct 2010 07:49p.m.

brian wrote:

John Robb: What other alternatives do we have? Do we allow these "idiots" run roughshod over all our rights of ownership etc and destroy whatever "they" seem fit to destroy? No way. If they can't pay for the damage done, lock em up so they can't cause more damage. These idiots seem to think they have the right to destroy everything "they" see - in their own demented universe - as being OK to wipe out. The message needs to be sent: Destroy others property at your own peril. Even if "they" are right, there are better ways to arouse/ignight public awareness rather than the reckless destruction of "whoevers" property. The alternative - their way - is chaois.

06 Oct 2010 04:49p.m.

John Robb wrote:

Brian tf we can't get any money out of the trusts of the people who owe tens of millions after perpetrating investment scams and committing theft I can't see how we're going to get any money out these essentially broke "Christian" hippies and a priest.

06 Oct 2010 03:50p.m.

brian wrote:

Persue the bastards. They have caused "damage" to someone elses property and irrespective of "whom ever" owns it is still "wilful damage" and done deliberately. This is an illegal act - in law - and must have consequences. Absolutely NOBODY has the right to wantonly damage or destroy ANYBODY ELSES property at any time, no matter what reason "they" may profess as their aim. If "they" are hiding behind trusts or whatever, still go for them and - if necessary - put them in prison where they can then "debate" their own future, if and when they actually get out. To my mind, never as willful and wanton destruction is never an option is solving any problem.

06 Oct 2010 02:20p.m.

John Robb wrote:

Like rubbing your a** with a brick this will be painful and pointless exercise.
These people probably have no money and if they do likely it'll be in family trusts just like many of our "upstanding" citizens and from where for some inexplicable reason it cannot be extracted no matter what they've done or how much they owe.