3News » Home
Full Story

UN climate conference opens in Copenhagen

10 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
Sculptures from the art installation 'The Pulse of the Earth' are pictured outside the congress centre in Copenhagen (Reuters)

Sculptures from the art installation 'The Pulse of the Earth' are pictured outside the congress centre in Copenhagen (Reuters)

video
Tue, 08 Dec 2009 7:16a.m.

The largest and most important UN climate change conference in history opened Monday, with organisers warning diplomats from 192 nations that this could be the last, best chance for a deal to protect the world from calamitous global warming.

Negotiations have dragged on for two years and only recently have shown signs of breakthroughs with new commitments from major emitters such as the United States, China and India to control greenhouse gas emissions.

In a signal the Obama administration is prepared to act without congressional action if needed, officials said the US Environmental Protection Agency has concluded that greenhouse gases are endangering Americans' health and must be regulated.

The two-week conference convened in an upbeat mood after a series of promises by rich and emerging economies to curb their greenhouse gases. Still, major issues have yet to be resolved.

At stake is a deal that aims to wean the world away from fossil fuels and other pollutants to greener sources of energy, and to transfer hundreds of billions of dollars from rich to poor countries every year over decades to help them adapt to climate change.

Scientists say without such an agreement, the Earth will face the consequences of ever-rising temperatures, leading to the extinction of plant and animal species, the flooding of coastal cities, more extreme weather events, drought and the spread of diseases.

With the commitments remaining short of scientists' demands, the pressure was on those major emitters for bigger cuts. Swedish Environment Minister Anders Carlgren, speaking for the European Union, said it would be "astonishing" if President Barack Obama came for the final negotiation session "to deliver just what was announced in last week's press release."

US EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson was expected to announce the endangerment finding later Monday, officials told The Associated Press, speaking privately because the announcement had not been made.

American business groups have strongly argued against tackling global warming through the Clean Air Act, saying it is less flexible and more costly than the bill being considered before Congress. On Monday, some of those groups questioned the timing of the EPA announcement, calling it political.

Climate activists in Copenhagen said the decision could help the Obama administration move ahead on climate policy without waiting for action from Congress.

"The question is will they use it that way, or are they using it as a bargaining chip to threaten action, and get Congress to act instead," said Damon Moglen, of Greenpeace USA.

Conference president Connie Hedegaard said the key to an agreement is finding a way to raise and channel public and private financing to poor countries for years to come to help them fight the effects of climate change.

Hedegaard - Denmark's former climate minister - said if governments miss their chance at the Copenhagen summit, a better opportunity may never come.

"This is our chance. If we miss it, it could take years before we got a new and better one. If we ever do," she said.

The conference opened with video clips of children from around the globe urging delegates to help them grow up without facing catastrophic warming. On the sidelines, climate activists competed for attention to their campaigns on deforestation, clean energy and low-carbon growth.

Mohamad Shinaz, an activist from the Maldives, plunged feet-first into a tank with nearly 200 gallons (750 litres) of frigid water to illustrate what rising sea levels were doing to his island nation.

"I want people to know that this is happening," Shinaz said as the water reached up to his chest. "We have to stop global warming."

Leah Wickham, a 24-year-old from Fiji, broke down in tears as she handed a petition from 10 million people asking the negotiators at Copenhagen to come up with a deal to save islands like hers.

"I'm on the front lines of climate change," she said.

Denmark's prime minister said 110 heads of state and government will attend the final days of the conference. Obama's decision to attend the end of the conference, not the middle, was taken as a signal that an agreement was getting closer.

"The evidence is now overwhelming" that the world needs early action to combat global warming, said Rajendra Pachauri, the head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, an UN expert panel.

He defended climate research in the face of a controversy over e-mails pilfered from a British university, which global warming sceptics say show scientists have been conspiring to hide evidence that doesn't fit their theories.

"The recent incident of stealing the e-mails of scientists at the University of East Anglia shows that some would go to the extent of carrying out illegal acts perhaps in an attempt to discredit the IPCC," he told the conference.

The first week of the conference will focus on refining the complex text of a draft treaty. But major decisions will await the arrival next week of environment ministers and the heads of state in the final days of the conference, which ends December 18.

"The time for formal statements is over. The time for restating well-known positions is past," said the UN's top climate official, Yvo de Boer. "Copenhagen will only be a success it delivers significant and immediate action."

Among those decisions is a proposed fund of $10 billion each year for the next three years to help poor countries create climate change strategies. After that, hundreds of billions of dollars will be needed every year to set the world on a new energy path and adapt to new climates.

"The deal that we invite leaders to sign up on will be one that affects all aspects of society, just as the changing climate does," said Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen. "Negotiators cannot do this alone, nor can politicians. The ultimate responsibility rests with the citizens of the world, who will ultimately bear the fatal consequences if we fail to act."

A study released by the UN Environment Program on Sunday indicated that pledges by industrial countries and major emerging nations fall just short of the reductions of greenhouse gas emissions that scientists have said are needed to keep average temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees C (3.6 F) by the end of the century.

In Vienna, another senior UN official warned that the fight against climate change must not "cannibalize" development financing.

Kandeh Yumkella, director-general of the UN Industrial Development Organization, said poor countries need "fresh money" to combat global warming, not funds diverted from efforts to improve maternal health or fight world hunger.

AP

 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [10]

Bill
08 Dec 2009 12:13p.m.

This just shows what a pack of alarmists are at this Scam meeting. They also showed a video of a child in a playground which turned into a wasteland. Just goes to show what these scam artists will go to to form their World Govt and tax the hell out of the population.

Rebecca
08 Dec 2009 11:34a.m.

Its supply and demand. STOP buying new. Buy secondhand where ever possible. Don't buy cheap made stuff from Countries who are making huge amounts of junk wrecking our environment in the process. Every time you chose not to makes a small dent and all those small dents make a difference. I reckon the days of refilling glass bottles and using paper bags need a comeback. Its in everyday living and sadly each generation is becoming more and more desensitised and thinks that all the plastic bottled water and the shops crammed full of China made clothing is the only way to live. If you don't buy it they have no market and things will have to then change. We are a very wasteful world who is stripping the Earth bare. Sadly we are all guilty. Even me. Cancer rates in 1900 - 1 in 1000. Cancer rates now - 1 in 3. We are killing ourselves off with our desire to own STUFF.

FFS
08 Dec 2009 11:32a.m.

Why does every article about climate change have to come with a load of idiot comments saying it's all a scam? Freedom of speech sucks.

Sceptical Guy
08 Dec 2009 11:19a.m.

Fascinating articles 'V'. Ta for that. I knew deforestation was bad, and that bio-fuels had created far more problems than they could ever solve, but I didn't realise the full scale of it all.
Thanks for a good (if somewhat disturbing) read!
Mike - I agree this needs to end. Unfortunately there's already too much money at stake for reason to prevail. Global carbon markets currently trade $126 billion per year (and set to rise). But of course it's us sceptics who are on the take (from oil companies).

ferrand stobart
08 Dec 2009 11:14a.m.

It seems well documented that the Carbon Dioxide [CO2} content of the atmosphere has changed, is changing and will continue to change - in an upward direction. I make no comment on the cause of that change, but on its biological and chemical effects, especially on Virus activity, The Sceptics say this CO2 change is not happening see, see www.climatepolice.com/Co2_report.pdf Main line Science says that it is see http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/sci_tech/2009/copenhagen/8386319.stm Carbon Dioxide is reportedly "acidifying" the Oceans as CO2 dissolved in water produces Carbonic Acid see http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/07/the-acid-ocean-the-other-problem-with-cosub2sub-emission/ Acidity and pH is on a log scale, a small change can have a very large chemical and physiological impact If this is so, anything else "damp" is likely to be "acidified", and most Virus flourish in more acid environments.This point has been know to HM Government for some time see www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/climatechange_grunhausproject.pdf which contains this reference:- Effects of CO2 on Mammalian Organisms Report of a Workshop, 5-6 June 1980, Bethesda, Maryland USA, published Dec 1982 by the US Dept of Energy, ref CONF-800249 (with disclaimer) 24 US and one European scientist attended. (Undersea Medical Society Inc, 9650 Rockville Pike,Bethesda, Maryland, 20014, USA). Page 10-3 possible effects on enzyme systems which are pH dependant ? Pages 10-6 to 10-13 Malignancies reference to lymphoma and mammary gland lymphoma effects. (12 references). Page 12-2 possible changes in blood pH. A subject which seems to have had little further investigation. Re possible impacts with Virus proliferation due to CO2 induced increased atmospheric acidity if this is happening then there is a likely connection to what is happening in the Ukraine for instance see http://blogs.healthfreedomalliance.org/blog/category/pandemic/ukraine/

cynical
08 Dec 2009 10:26a.m.

And these awful sculptures did not cause a carbon footprint? How much did they cost? How many children would this have fed? Everybody talks about greenhouse gases, nobody about the real issue, the need to plant trees and reverse the deforestation of the rainforests. It is terribly offputting, the waste, the skirting around the main issues, all to protect their own interests, not what really matters as a first priority. If all that energy and costs had gone into tree planting, the problem would actually start to get addressed. As for technology, it is human nature to make things better, it does not need taxes!

Jim
08 Dec 2009 10:23a.m.

This is definitely UN art. I wonder how much of our Climate Change taxes are going to go on this idiot artist!!!

paul
08 Dec 2009 9:53a.m.

Note: Most of our major cities and centres are on the coast Point: if there is 'global warming' - and supposed sea rises why has NOT one penny of the governments money gone into preparing us for this urgent and impending problem? Why are businesses not being evacuated? Why are homes not been evacuated? Where are flood systems not being invested in? Why are no coastal sea rise barriers not been invested in? Yet - New Zealand's wealth will be stripped.... Think about it people. Think about it. Ask questions

Mike
08 Dec 2009 8:47a.m.

What awful looking sculptures, is this how they envisage the human race if they succeed in imposing their global government!

This needs to end people, we need to stand up and object, we need to get mad!

V
08 Dec 2009 7:38a.m.

Is this a sign of the times, The UN glorifying its effects on man! http://home.att.net/~meditation/bio-fuel-hoax.html http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1725975,00.html Seems like Greenpeace is on both sides of these scandals.

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio

Post your opinion