3News » Home
Full Story

Copenhagen deal thrashed out

11 comments | Post Comment Email Print Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
Sat, 19 Dec 2009 6:05p.m.

By Samantha Hayes

They had a grand ambition to save the planet – in the end politicians at the Climate Change conference struggled to save face.

Instead of the legally-binding treaty climate scientists said was vital, world leaders agreed on a collection of pledges for the future.

They include a target of keeping global temperature rises below two degrees and for a group of developed countries to give $30 billion over three years to help poorer nations.

The deal was thrashed out by five countries, the US, China, India, South Africa and Brazil.

In the end, it came down to a tense meeting between the US and China, and the body language said everything.

Efforts to salvage a global agreement were hampered by deep divisions between rich and poor nations.

But US President Barack Obama made sure of an agreement of sorts – though even he admits it is an imperfect framework.

The main points you should know are:

1. The deal was thrashed out by five countries: the US, China, India, South Africa and Brazil

2. They have agreed to give developed countries $30 billion over three years

3. There has been no decision on reaching a target for cutting carbon emissions

4. It does include a method for verifying each nation's emissions reductions

So they have made it, but it is an agreement that is filled with flaws; $30 billion over the next three years – but it is not the universally accepted agreement everyone was hoping for and developing countries will be disappointed.

Massive expectation was hanging on the arrival of the US president.

Barack Obama’s frustration at the lack of progress was evident.

“We will be back having the same stale arguments month after month, year after year perhaps decade after decade; all while the danger of climate change grows until it's irreversible,” he said in his speech.

After all the hype building up to his appearance, the reception for his words was lukewarm.

Kumi Naidoo from Greenpeace says he thought the president’s speech was “excellent on rhetoric”.

“It gets how serious the problem is; very, very low on detail. He has not put anything fresh on the table.”

Obama’s tactics – holding private meetings with a select few – were condemned by those who were left out.

“Behind everyone's back in an anti-democratic way cooks up a document. Cooks up a document that we don't accept, we will never accept it,” said Hugo Chavez, president of Venezuela.

As the talks ploughed on relentlessly into the night, protesters staged a torch-lit vigil, calling on the leaders to salvage an accord.

Inside the conference centre, the strain of the past two weeks was taking its toll.

At last though, some nations did accept Obama's document; an agreement of sorts, in name, if not substance.

The major emitters have agreed to give developing countries $30 billion over the next three years.

Prime Minister John Key says it is progress.

“But I think it falls well short of the expectations and aspirations people had for Copenhagen.”

Officials will now pour over the detail, such as it is.

It is a big disappointment for developing countries, a far cry from the $200 billion they were hoping for and nowhere near enough to fight climate change effectively.

3 News

Comments [11]

michael
22 Dec 2009 8:11p.m.

sigh. i shouldn't have expected better from world leaders. i see why it is so hard for them to just make definitive action to stop climate change. and even if this is a ntural occurance it doesn't matter because even if it is natural we still die in the end anyway.therefore why not attempt to stop it wether it is man-made or it is natural?

V
20 Dec 2009 11:37a.m.

Cryil, Yes the $200Billion or so was promised to get the support of the third world, At the last minute the "Danish text" whistle was blown written by none other than Rudd the "Socialist Eugenicist" showing the real deal was for the World Bank and the Elites were to administer this money!. I believe that some heads will roll in Australia these are serious crimes of insider trading and bear faced fraud!.

Hardie
20 Dec 2009 7:21a.m.

Unbelievable, commonsense prevailed. They finally realised what a huge scam it was and have engineered a political escape from future derision.

Steve
20 Dec 2009 6:11a.m.

Well, what has also been the cost of the 'carbon footprint' of this shame?

Once again, the rich get richer and all us Joe 90's get to pay for it!

cyril
19 Dec 2009 10:50p.m.

This result is expected. The poor countrys were expecting a 200 billion handout with no accountability and the so called rich countrys dont want to be poor countrys so this was never going to happen. How is giving money to these countrys going to help global warming as most of the poor countrys have corrupt goverments who steal any aid given which is why they are poor so why would this be any differant? We would be better off to develop cleaner technologys then export them to the rest of the world.

chickenfarmer
19 Dec 2009 9:14p.m.

Ok, get ready for the choir boys to sing. The one thing that stands out to me is that money will not have a thing to do with climate change. Like ALICE said "what does money have to do with carbon emissions"? If any of this has any valitity wonder what man was doing about the carbon emissions when the sea that covered the Sahara Desert dryed up HUH? Tell me,explain that one. Climate change is not an act of man but, that of nature. When the Lord created the heavens an the earth an man eat of the forbidden fruit, elvolution began. Nothing more, many times over has the Earth changed itself, destroyed everything in its path. In returning to what could be so called normal, parts of the Earth picked up an went forward worldwide. The Evil of Man for the greed of Money has driven Religion out the window. All the so-called leaders of every country are not repersenting their country nor the citizens. The office they hold is for self greed of the mighty currency it has, the countries that countrol the world is the ones that control the gold. No different than with the Holy Roman Impire. Today, the world will collapse, not just one country. Gold has spread worldwide.
The universe of the world is and has been forever changing since the beginning of time. There is no changing that, our Bibles tells us all, it delivers the same message to everyone. Until Man puts their faith back into our Lord and the Bibles teaching and disregards the false words of man we will follow history, as it repeats itself over and over again as it has in the past. Man does not have the capitibilities of even altering the evolutions of time.

V
19 Dec 2009 7:55p.m.

Climate deal TRASHED victory for common science!.

Bill
19 Dec 2009 7:40p.m.

Well they achieved one thing, set up a 100 billion dollar fraud fund. Obama is just like all the other Gutless Leaders, believes in fairy tales.

Alice
19 Dec 2009 7:26p.m.

What my parents want to know is, how does giving $30 billion to poorer countries reduce carbon emissions?

V
19 Dec 2009 6:54p.m.

Grand plan to Enslave the planet. Don't worry Barrack you will need all the oil you can get to hold of the record Snow storms and record level low temperature back home... We don't see that on TV do we. . The real question is still left unanswered WHO wanted all this money!.

Post a comment

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:


3News Video 3News Audio